Rajasthan Court July 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sher Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-12-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN702
S.S. Byas, J.1. Sher Singh and his father Prem Singh, the two appellants before us were convicted Under Section 302/34 and 448 IPC and each was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 200, in default of the payment of fine to further undergo two months' rigorous imprisonment on the first count and six months rigorous imprisonment under the second count. The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. They have come up in appeal and challenge their conviction.2. The incident is alleged to have taken place at about 10 or 11 p.m. on 30-6-1979 in village Jhundpuri P.S. Tizara District Alwar in which one Preet Kaur aged about 10 years was nacked to death by the appellants with the aid and assistance of Fauza Singh who was the other son of the appellant Prem Singh. The deceased victim Preet Kaur was the wife of the appellant Sher Singh. The prosecution case may be stated as under:3. PW 8 Mst. Devti Kuar and PW 6 Hukam Singh are the parents and PW 9 Jeet Kaur is the...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hukam Chand
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1989
Reported in: [1990]182ITR395(Raj)
1. In this reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), the following question has been referred for the consideration of this court :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the share income of Rs. 3,950 earned in the name of Sri Ajay Kumar, minor son of the assessee, cannot be included in the hands of the assessee under Section 64?'2. Shri Singhal, learned counsel for the Revenue, has invited our attention to the order of this court dated May 13, 1988 in D. B. Income-tax Reference No. 47 of 1982 (C/T v. Bal Mukund ). We find that in that case also the question which was referred for the consideration of this court was on the same lines, with regard to the interpretation of Section 64 of the Income-tax Act and this court held (at page 43) that Section 64 of the Act applies where the minor child is of an individual who is the asse...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kanhaiyalal Ghatiwala
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1989
Reported in: [1989]180ITR338(Raj)
1. In this reference, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following question for the consideration of this court:'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the concealment of income occurred on the date when the original return of income was filed and not on the date when the return of income was filed in response to a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and in directing in that view that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) should be imposed according to the law existing on the date when the return of income was filed originally and not according to the law existing on the date on which the return of income was filed under Section 148, i.e., the law as amended with effect from April 1, 1968 ?'2. We find that the Allahabad High Court in Addl. CIT v. Mewa Lal Sankatha Prasad : [1979]116ITR356(All) has taken the view that for t...
Mangat and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)86
I.S. Israni, J.1. Heard, both the parties.2. The petitioners are alleged to have committed an offence under Section 302, Indian Penal Code.3. It is contended by Shri Dhankhar, learned Counsel for the petitioner that deceased Amarchand was beaten to death by Badan Singh and thereafter, Bhikharam & Yadram also came and gave beating to the deceased of which he was injured. It is contended that the petitioners were not present at that time and much after the incident, the petitioner and Ors. are said to have come on roof of the house and these two persons along with others threw stones by which one Ram Lal received three injuries i e. abrasion, confusion and tenderness.4 The contention of learned Counsel for the complainant Shri Bhandari and Shri Srimal, learned Public Prosecutor that they were members of unlawful assembly and are responsible for the death of deceased Amarchand. It is also pointed out that the investigation is still pending and, therefore, they do not deserve to be release...
Roobharoo Singh Alias Bhanwar Singh Vs. State and District Excise Offi ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)179
G.K. Sharma, J.1. This petition Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the Order dated 18-1-1989 and 19 12-75 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, No. 2, Jaipur Distt. Jaipur in criminal case No. 743/79 under Section 16/54 of the Excise Act.2. A report was lodged by Excise Inspector on 28-1-75 against the petitioner alleging that he was having 2 bottles of liquor in his possession. On this report a case was registered. The petitioner on 26-2-75 moved an application (that be is ready to pay Rs. 200/- as composition amount and permission be granted to compound the matter. The then District Excise Officer passed the following Order:fu;ekuqlkj dEikm.M djus dh fn'kk es dk;Zokgh djs jde tek gksus rd3 On perusing the certificate issued by the DEO. it seems that the-petitioner had deposited Rs. 100/- towards the compound money on 19 12-75. The challan was submitted against the petitioner on 19-12-75 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate and the case is still pending The petitioner submitted...
Chhotu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)83
G.K. Sharma, J.1. With the consent of both the learned Counsel the revision petition is disposed of at this stage.2. The petitioner was challaned under Section 54/16, Rajasthan Excise Act. This incident has taken place on 28-8-1983 and the petitioner was found working on a workable still and taking out liquor. The Excise Inspector arrested the accused for extracting the liquor along with the extracted liquor.3. After concluding the trial the learned Magistrate found the petitioner guilty under Section 54/16, Exercise Act and sentenced him to six months' RI and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo one month's imprisonment. Aggrieved by this order an appeal was preferred and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Neem-ka-Thana vide the order dated 29-6-1989 dismissed the appeal and maintained the conviction and sentence awarded by the trial. Court.4. The learned Counsel fro the petitioner did not argue on the merit of the case but it was stated that this inciden...
The Bharatpur Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. Ratan Singh and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-07-1989
Reported in: (1995)IIILLJ813Raj; 1990(1)WLN193
S.S. Bvas, J.1. The petitioner is an employer and the non-petitioner Ratan Singh is the employed person. The revision is directed against the order of the Additional District Judge (2) Bharatpur, dated May 5, 1984 by which he upheld the order of the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, dated September 30, 1982 and dismissed the petitioner's appeal. By his order, dated September 30, 1982, the Authority decided two applications filed by the employed person Ratan Singh under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter to be referred to as the 'Act') and directed the employer to pay a sum of Rs. 25,240/- to the employed person.2. The material facts may be noticed in brief. The non-petitioner Ratan Singh was holding the post of Assistant Executive Officer in the employer-Bank, Bharatpur. He submitted two applications under Section 15(2) of the Act claiming wages for the period from July, 1979 to August, 1979 at the rate of Rs. 916/- per month and for the period from...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Man Kanwar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-07-1989
Reported in: II(1990)ACC482; 1991ACJ446
Milap Chandra, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 30, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Udaipur (hereinafter to be called 'the Commissioner') dated January 31, 1986 awarding Rs. 21,600/- as compensation, Rs. 2,160/- as penalty and interest and Rs. 140/- as costs, total Rs. 23,900/-. The facts of the case giving rise to this appeal may be summarised thus.2. The deceased Lal Singh was posted as Forest Guard in January, 1983 at Lifafa Forest Outpost. During the night intervening 24th and 25th January, 1983, he had a heart attack while he was on duty. Post-mortem examination on his dead body was performed and the cause of his death was found to be shock due to acute myocardial infarction. A claim petition was filed before the Commissioner by the respondents, No. 1 being widow of the deceased and Nos. 2 and 3 being sons of the deceased Lal Singh. The appellant filed its reply ...
Nand Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-07-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)136
I.S. Israni, J.1. Heard the parties. The petitioners are alleged to have committed an offence under Section 307, IPC.2. It is contended by Shri Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner that there has been fight between both the parties in which persons from the accused party have also received grievous injuries. Smt. Kamla, mother of accused Nand Lal has received two injuries, out of which one is grievous. Similarly other persons from the accused side have also received injuries. It is submitted that even though Nand lal and Raju were armed with sword, but the only injury caused by Nand lal to Mohammed Yamin is incised wound, which is simple in nature. The petitioner Raju was also said to have been armed with sword, who is said to have caused two injuries to Mohammad Irfan, one of which is incised wound on little finger, which is said to be grievous. Other wound is on the left hand.3. It is contended by Shri Srimal, learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner were armed with sword a...
Hansraj Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-07-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)152
I.S. Israni, J.1. Heard both the parties. The petitioner is alleged to have committed offence under Section 307/323 IPC. It is given at by learned Counsel for the petitioner Shri Gupta that while the complainant reached infront of the house of Hansraj, who gave him two blows with 'Khutia' on head and in all caused eight injuries to him. From the medical report, read out by the learned Counsel, all the injuries are simple in nature.2. It is contended by learned Public Prosecutor Shri Srimal that since the injuries have been caused on head the intention was to kill him, therefore, a case is made out under Section 307 IPC and the petitioner is not entitled indulgence of the provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C.3. In the circumstances. I am inclined to grant indulgence of the provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner Hansraj.4. The SHO/AO/IO PS Mangrole is direct, that in the event of arrest of the pet. Hansraj, in FIR No. 103/89. he be released on bail, provided he furnishes a perso...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »