Rajasthan Court May 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devi Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-10-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN454
S.S. Byas, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner assails order Ex. 10 dated October 10, 1988 by which the respondent No. 2 viz. The child Development Project Officer, Wair terminated his services.2. Material facts may be noticed in brief. The petitioner was appointed as a Chowkidar vide order Ex. 1 dated 26-8-1986 by respondent No. 2 viz. the child Development Project Officer, Women Child and Nutrition Department on daily wages for a period of three months. He joined the duty or that very day, and continued to work. The term of his service was extended from time to time by orders Ex. 2 to Ex. 9. He continued to work under these orders His services were terminated by the impugned order Ex 10 dated 10 10-1988 w.e.f. 12-10-1988. The petitioner challenges the termination of his service on the grounds that the Department of Women Child and Nutrition is an industry and he was a workman there in. The termination of his services amounts to retrenchment as d...
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Kapur Trunk Factory
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1989
Reported in: [1990]79STC334(Raj)
J.S. Verma, C.J.1. This is a revision against the order dated September 30, 1986, passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal dismissing the department's appeal against the order of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) by which the order of the original assessing authority was set aside. The limited question for decision in this revision is whether there is any ground for interference within the scope of revision. Having heard the learned counsel, I am satisfied that there is no ground to interfere in this revision.2. The assessee's tax was assessed by the assessing authority to the best of his judgment made by him and several reasons were given by the assessing authority for taking this action. However, the assessee's appeal to the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) succeeded and the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) after considering all the reasons which weighed with the assessing authority came to the conclusion that there was no reasonable basis for resorting to this mode of assessment. However, the Dep...
Smt. Ajeet Mehta and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1989
Reported in: 1990CriLJ1596; 1989(2)WLN273
ORDERA.K. Mathur, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 4-9-1982 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Jodhpur City Jodhpur.2. The brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that a complaint was filed by Shri M.M. Mehta a resident of P.W.D. Colony, Jodhpur to the effect that the non-petitioners are doing business of fodder and are stocking this fodder namely, Chipta, Pala, Kutrar Khakla and grass at plot No. 113-C, P.W.D. Colony, Jodhpur. It was also alleged that in the course of their business the non-petitioners bring different kinds of fodder in huge quantity through truck and tractors and stock on this plot. The residents on account of stocking of the fodder suffer physical discomfort and it is a health- hazard for the residents of whole of the colony. Therefore, it was prayed that this nuisance should be removed from the area.3. A return was filed by the non-petitioners and it was alleged therein that the complainant is not the...
Subesh Chand Vs. M.S.J. College
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)90
1. The petitioner has challenged the order Annex. 1 which has also been filed as Annexure R-4 along with the reply. the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that he was visited with the Punishment without affording any opportunity of hearing or any opportunity to show the reasons to the petitioner.2. Under Annexure-1 to the writ petition the petitioner's examination of M.A previous (Economics) had been cancelled and he has been debarred from appearing in any examination in the year 1989. Even in the reply filed by the non-petitioners it is no where stated that the said order Annexure 1 has been made after giving reasonable. opportunity and after showing the reasonable cause. All has been stated that in the reply in para 7 is that the petitioner took away the answer book from the examination hall and also provoked others students for mass-boycott It is also stated that the petitioner and other students have filed representation but no copy of the representation has be...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Shanti Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-05-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)62
Sobhag Mal Jain, J.1. This appeal by the State is directed against the judgment dated 26th October, 1978, of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Doongar Pur, acquitting the accused respondent for the offence under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.2. A sample of Turmeric (Haldi) was taken by the Food Inspector, District Doongarpur from the shop of the respondent on December 17, 1975. On examination by the Public Analyst, the sample was found to be adulterated as it was heavily damaged by insects, although no insects were found present in the sample. The Chief Judicial Magistrate has acquitted the respondents on the ground that the prosecution failed to establish that the article was un-fit for human consumption.3. In my opinion the appeal deserves to be dismissed on the ground of delay. The sample was taken as back as December 27, 1975. The respondent was acquitted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate o...
Ramdayal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-05-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)93
S.S. Byas, J.1. Heard. The petitioners are convicted persons under Section 302, IPC whose convictions have been maintained by the Supreme Court. They have come under Section 482, Cr.P.C. with the prayer that the marriage of their daughters is going to be solemnized on May 8, 1989. As such the sentences awarded to them may be suspended in order to enable them to perform the ceremonies of the marriages of their daughters. 2. The reasons stated by the petitioners appear to be genuine. Since the marriage of their daughters is going to take place on May 8, 1989, the prayer is allowed. The sentences awarded to them shall remain suspended for the period from 6-5-1989 to 17-5-1989; provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,0(0/- together with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar (Judicial) Rajasthan High Court Bench at Jaipur. The petitioners will surrender on 18-5-1989 before the Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur where...
R.N. Products Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-03-1989
Reported in: 1990(1)WLN318
R.S Verma, J.1. The petitioner before us was granted a licence for establishment of a bonded were house on 6-10-1987 by the Excise Commissioner, Rajasthan Udaipur. This licence permitted the petitioner to establish and a run a bonded Ware-house for the receipt and storage of Indian made foreign liquor under bond, whether bottled or in bulk or both of Indian manufacture transported or imported into Rajasthan from any place within the Indian Union as approved by the Excise Commissioner, for refuse, bottling, transport or export in bond or on payment of duty Within or outside the State. The petitioner was required to establish a bonded Ware-house and a bottling plant in the city of Jodhpur as per the terms and conditions mentioned in the said licence. The licence was granted in pursuance of the provisions of s. 17(d) of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (Act No. 11 of 1950) here in after called 'the Act.' The licence, inter alia, stated that the bonded were house was to be established within...
Jagjiwan Chand Bhandari Vs. Rajasthan High Court and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-03-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN74
R.S. Verma, J.1. The brief facts giving rise to this writ petition lie in a narrow compass. Petitioner Jagjiwanchand Bhandari was employed as Senior Bench Reader in this High Court at Jaipur Bench on 25-5-85.Since a disciplinary proceeding was a subsequent order Annex 2 dated 17-7-85, the head-quarters of Shri Bhandhari was shifted from Jaipur to Jodhpur. On 29-1-86 the petitioner memo Annex, 3 where by he was asked to explain why he had not marked his attendance daily in the office in disregard of the direction given to him. Annex. 7 dated 11-4-86, the petitioner submitted that when his head-quarters him, By was shifted from Jaipur to Jodhpur, there was no direction to attend office and as such, there was no non-compliance of the order from his side. explanation was not found to be satisfactory by the Registrar, This charge sheet upon the petitioner along with 'memo Anne 4 where by following charges were framed against him:[1] That Shri Jagjiwanchand Bhandari Senior Bench Reader of Ra...
New Great Insurance Company of India Ltd. Vs. Koshalesh Sharma and ors ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-03-1989
Reported in: II(1991)ACC684
I.S. Israni, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gangapur City, in case No. 31/1972. For the purposes of this appeal, it will suffice to state that an accident took place on November21, 1971. It is stated that while the respondent No. 1 Koshalesh Sharma was standing on the road on his correct side alongwith some other persons, a bus bearing No. RSL 337, which was coming from Karoli, came and struck him and caused injuries to respondent No. 1 on account of which his leg had to be imputed and he also received severe injuries in the right leg. In the claim petition, the claimant respondent No. 1 claimed a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- for the loss of his leg, pain and mental agony, but the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 55,000/- only as compensation. The appellant Insurance Company was made liable only to the extent of Rs. 50,000/- and interest thereon.2. The contention of Shri. G.K. Bhartiya, learned Counsel for ...
Kishan Lal Vs. Shyam Lal Represented by Kedar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-1989
Reported in: AIR1990Raj46
Israni, J.1. This revision petition hasbeen referred by learned single Judge fordecision to larger Bench and has formulatedfollowing two questions:1. Whether a decree for eviction passed prior to the applicability of the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for a particular area can be executed by the executing Court and if so in what circumstances? 2. In case it is found that it is permissible forthe executing Court to proceed with theexecution of such a decree and to hold aninquiry about the satisfaction of the groundscontained in Section 13 of the Act, what is scope ofsuch an inquiry? 2. The brief facts out of which the present revision petition has arisen are that Shyam Lal owner of a shop situated in village Chhipa-Badod let out his shop on rent to the petitioner Kishan Lal. Shyam Lal filed a suit for eviction of the petitioner oh January 4, 1972 under the provisions of the Act which were not applicabl...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »