Rajasthan Court July 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhanwar Singh Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-29-1987
Reported in: 1988CriLJ1054; 1987WLN(UC)713
S.N. Bhargava, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu, convicting the accused-appellant under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentencing him to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months' R.I., and further convicting the appellant under Section 301, I.P.C. and sentencing him to two years' R.I. and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of payment whereof to further undergo one month's R.I.2. Gangu Singh (PW 9), uncle of the deceased Smt. Vimla lodged a report (Ex.P. 13) at P.S. Sujangarh on 22-5-84 stating that Smt. Vimla, daughter of his elder brother Jagmal Singh, was married to Bhanwar Singh accused some 8-9 years before and she used to stay with him. She had given birth to a child but the same had also expired. On 26-3-84 Keshat Singh had come to him and informed him that Vimla had gone somewhere being annoyed from her husband on 23-3-84 and a search was being made but so far she has no...
Smt. Prem Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-29-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)WLN324
Surendra Nath Bhargava, J.1. This is a habeas corpus petition filed by Smt. Prem Kaur challenging the illegal detention of her son Krishna Kumar alias Bebi, son of Lokendra Nath, by caste Jat, resident of Gopalgarh, Bharatpur.2. The order of detention was passed by the District Magistrate, Bharatpur on 9th October, 1986 Annx. 2 under Section 3(2)(3) of the National Security Act, 1980, here in after referred to as the 'Act'. The said order was confirmed by (he State Government vide their order dated 15-10 1986 (Annx. 4). The Advisory Board also recommended the detention and therefore, an order came to be passed on 18-11-86 (Annx. 4) under Section 13 of the Act, confirming the order of detention dated 9-10-1986 for detaining Krishna Kumar for one year upto 8-10-1987, and these orders have been challenged by the petitioner.3. The writ petition was filed on 1-5-987. Notices were issued and the State Government has filed the return on 13-7-1987.4. We have heard learned Counsel for the parti...
Smt. Shashi Rani Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-29-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)584
Kishore Singh Lodha, J.1. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu has taken cognizance of offence under Section 8(1) of the Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952(No. XXX of 1952)(here in after referred to as 'the Act') against the petitioner on the ground that the petitioners continued to run the cinema house despite the expiry of the licence granted to them. The petitioners have challenged this order by this application under Section 482 Cr. PC on the ground that no offence is made out against them at all and, therefore, the cognizance could not have been taken.2. In order to appreciate the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioners, a few facts may be mentioned. Petitioner Smt. Shashi Rani Gupta is the Manager of the Cinema and petitioner No. 2 Alok is her son. The original licence granted to the cinema house called 'Alok Chitra Mandir' was renewed up to March 31, 1984. No application for its renewal was made within the prescribed time and despite the expiry of the...
Magh Dass Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-28-1987
Reported in: 1988(1)WLN154
M.C. Jain, J.1. This application under Section 482, Cr.PC is directed against the order dated 6-11-1986 of the learned Sessions Judge, Churu passed in Criminal Revision No. 167 of 1986, whereby, he maintained the order of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Sardar Shahar dated 31-10-1986.2. The case has long chequered history and has arisen in the circumstances that one Arjundas Pujari filed a suit as far back as the year 1962 That suit was decreed by the Assistant Collector, Churu on 24-9-1968 An appeal was preferred by the present petitioner Maghdass and the same was dismissed on 31-8-1977 and second appeal was also dismissed by the Board of Revenue on 21-2-1985. In execution of the decree, filed by the decree-holder warrant of possession was issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer on 8-5-1985 and in execution of warrant of possession, the judgment-debtor Maghdass Was dispossessed on 23-5-1985 from the land comprised of khasra Nos. 162 168 and 169 as stated in the warrant of pos...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. RamnaraIn Gulraj
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: [1988]173ITR74(Raj)
1. This reference is made under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the Revenue to answer the following question of law, namely :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the firm stood dissolved on the death of Smt. Parvati Devi on June 2, 1978, and, thereafter, two separate assessments should have been made for the two periods preceding and following the date of death of the partner '2. The relevant assessment year is 1979-80, Admittedly, this is a case governed by Sections 187 and 188 of the Act, as they stand after the insertion of the proviso in Sub-section (2) of Section 187 retrospectively with effect from April I, 1975, by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984. On the facts and in the circumstances of this case, it is clearly a case of succession governed by Section 188 of the Act, since the applicability of Section 187 is excluded by virtue of the provi...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Assumal Veerumal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: [1988]170ITR489(Raj)
1. This reference is made under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the Revenue for answering the following question of law, namely:'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no error in the order of the Income-tax Officer as the firm stood dissolved on the death of Shri Assumal, partner, on August 11, 1975, and, therefore, two separate assessments should have been made for the two periods, meaning thereby, up to September 11, 1975, and for the period from September 12, 1975, to April 30, 1976?'2. The assessee-firm consisted initially of four partners, namely, Assumal, Virumal, Tillomal and Lachmandass, having equal shares. On the death of Assumal on September 11, 1975, the remaining three partners constituted a firm with a newly admitted partner, Manohar Lal, vide partnership deed dated September 21, 1975. A minor was also admitted to the benefits of the...
Sagar Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: 1988(1)WLN137
M.C. Jain, J.1. This is an application under Section 482 Cr. PC for setting aside the order of the Sessions Judge, Merta dated 5-2-1981 confirming the order of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Nawa dated 5-12-1975 whereby the application filed under Section 197 Cr.PC was rejected. It may be stated here that against the order of the learned Magistrate a revision was earlier preferred before the Sessions Judge but the learned Sessions Judge rejected the revision petition on 27-2-1976 in limine holding that revision is not maintainable against the impugned interlocutory order.2. The facts of the case may briefly be stated: The applicant Sagar Mai was an Executive Officer of Mun cipal Board. Nawa and according to him on 20th November, 1973 he was posted as Administrator of Municipal Board, Nawa. At the instance of one Hira Lal, Dharam Chand Malick Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption made a trap on the application for having accepted illegal gratification. The allegations ag...
Rajasthan Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Prasad and anr ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)430
1. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner - Rajasthan Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Gulabpura, Bhilwara has challenged the legality and correctness of the Award dated 21st August, 1986 given by learned Labour Judge, Udaipur. The submission of Mr. D.K. Parihar is that the Labour Judge has taken into consideration the seriousness of the charge against the petitioner i.e. his being obstinate to the concerned engineer and the misconduct of the petitioner, still the learned Labour Judge has taken lenient view in reinstating the petitioner. According to Mr. Purohit, if the discretion is allowed to be used in such a way, it would be very difficult for the petitioner to maintain discipline amongst the workers. The matter relates to the dismissal of Rajendra Prasad, a helper working with the petitioner in the year, 1983. On the charge of being obstinate with one engineer on 20th Feburary, 1983, the Labour Authority referred the matter to the Labo...
New Kabristan Committee Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)462
1. The dispute relates to a plot of land set-apart by the Collector under Section 92 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act (for short 'the Act') for Kabristan in Nawalgarh.2. The Muslim population in Nawalgarh is said to be about 30,000 and the Muslims of that area and the adjoining area had been long demanding from the authorities for providing suitable land for Kabristan. An application was submitted on September 1, 1984 to the Tehsildar for allotment of land for Kabristan. That application came into process and Tehsildar, Nawalgarh sent communication on 18th September, 1984 by which he forwarded the request of the Muslim population along with the report of the Patwari, to the Collector for necessary action in the matter of allotment of land for Kabristan. The Collector sought opinion from the Superintendent of Police on the advisibility of allotment of land bearing Khasra Nos 1681/2 and 1681/4 for Kabristan. The Superintendent of Police directed the Circle Officer, Nawalgarh to conduct ...
Subedar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-27-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)618
Vinod Shankar Dave, J.1. The petitioner who was a Nazir in the Court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Hindaun is alleged to have embezzled Rs. 10,075/- and hence a report was lodged against him at police station, Hindaun by the then Munsif, Hindaun. This report was based on the audit of the accounts and the police thereafter investigated the sase and filed two separate charge-sheets against the accused for offences under Sections 409 and 477A, IPC. The offences are alleged to have been committed during the period 1976 to 1978. The case was tried by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapur City who convicted and sentenced the accused as under:(1) Under Section 409, IPC for 3 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 3000/-, in default of which 6 months' further imprisonment.(2) Under Section 477A, IPC for 2 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine Rs. 1000/-, in default of which 6 months' further imprisonment.2. Accused filed unsuccessful appeals before the Addl. Sessions Judge, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »