Rajasthan Court April 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandan Lal Vs. Nand Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-09-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)WLN205
Navin Chandra Sharma, J.1. This order will dispose of Criminal Revisions No. 106 and 107 of 1979 filed by Chandan Lal Agarwal against two orders of Judicial Magistrate, Nawa both dated January 29, 1979 passed by him accepting final reports Nos 14 and 15 of 1978 submitted by the Officer-in-charge, Police Station, Nawa after rejecting the protest petitions filed by the petitioner2. Facts leading to the filing of these revisions are that on February 10, 1978 petitioner Chandan Lal Agarwal filed a criminal complaint against Nand Lal Mor with the allegations that he was proprietor of M/s Rajasthan Gum and Plastic Factory, Nawa (Kuchaman Road) which manufactured ''Guwar Chun', corma. cattle feed and ''Guwar gum'. Non-petitioner Nand Lal Mor used to work as a temporary Manager to look after the factory. On January 25, 1977 the non-petitioner, misusing his position as temporary Manager represented himself as selling agent of the factory and without the knowledge of the petitioner, received amo...
Smt. Phoola Bai Vs. Firm Shiv Nath Moti Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-09-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)WLN935
Mohini Kapoor, J.1. In execution petition moved by the present non-petitioner, the petitioner preferred objections which were disallowed by the Executing Court, viz. the Civil Judge, Kota, by order dated 19-3-1981. The petitioner's appeal against the rejection of her objections was also dismissed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 2 Kota, on 29-11-1986. It is against this order that she has come in this revision petition.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the property in dispute belonged to Shri Vasu Pujjiyaji, Kota (here in after referred to as the temple), and the petitioner's mother Smt. Ida was a tenant in two shops of this temple at a monthly rent of Rs. 8/-p.m. A suit for rent and eviction was filed on behalf of the temple, which was decreed on 22-4-1963. Smt. Ida preferred an appeal before the District Judge Kota, and that was also dismissed on 27-5-1965. Thereafter no proceedings took place in court till the year 1975, when the present respondent mo...
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sheela Rani and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-08-1987
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN256
Inder Sen Israni, J.1. This Special Appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance has been filed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated September 3, 1986 whereby the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur, dated 18-2-1982 in claim case No. 291/77 was modified.2. Brief facts giving-rise to the present appeal are that a claim petition for compensation on account of death of Moti Lal husband of respondent No. 5 and father of respondent No. 2 due to accident that occurred on 10-5-1977 at Jaipur while the deceased was going on his Suvega auto-cycle, was filed. It is alleged that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent; driving of Fiat Car which was at the relevant time driven by respondent No. 5.3. During the course of proceedings before the Tribunal, Smt. Mooli Devi w/o Kanhaiya Lal respondent No. 3 mother of deceased applied that she may also be impleaded as an applicant. This prayer was granted and she was added as an appli...
Harbhan and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-08-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)WLN350
Gopal Krishna Sharma, J.1. D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 447/83 has been preferred by Harbhan against his conviction under Section 302, I.P.C. He was found guilty under Section 302, I.P.C. vide judgment dated 11-8-1983 by Additional Sessions Judge, Deeg and sentenced for life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 6 months rigorous imprisonment.2. Against the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge dated 11 8-1983 the State has also preferred an appeal. In all 15 persons were challenged. The learned Additional Sessions Judge found the accused Harbhan only guilty of the offence under Section 302, I.P.C. and acquitted rest of the accused-persons. Against the acquittal, the State has preferred this appeal. Leave to appeal was granted to the State with regard to accused Sarvan, Kajali, Lal Chand, Data Ram, Kallu, Kanhaiya and Bhagwan Singh only.3. Against that very judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, by which he acquitted other accused perso...
Centuary Ecka Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-06-1987
Reported in: [1987]67STC103(Raj)
Navin Chandra Sharma, J.1. The appellant, M/s. Centuary Ecka, Jodhpur, is a duly registered partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, having its registered office at 182, Balniketan Road, Jodhpur, and its branch office at Pali. This firm is also registered as a dealer under the provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter, for short, 'the Rajasthan Act') as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter, for short, 'the Central Act'). This firm is doing business in purchasing and selling of packing materials, that is, waterproof paper (bituminised paper), the PVC bags and poly propylene bags, etc., at Jodhpur as well as at Pali. During the financial year 1978-79, the appellant-firm effected sale of waterproof paper only worth Rs. 2,32,074.50 at its head office at Jodhpur and worth Rs. 25,757.10 at its branch office at Pali and it charged sales tax from the customers at 4 per cent treating them as packing material and deposited the tax amount a...
Municipal Council, Bharatpur Vs. Gokul Chand and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-04-1987
Reported in: AIR1988Raj103; 1987WLN(UC)734
ORDERInder Sen Israni, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against the order dt. 29-10-1986 passed by the learned Addl. Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Bharatpur, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 13, Rule 2, C.P.C. was dismissed.2. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and also perused the impugned order as well as the law cited at the bar.3. The contention of Mr. G. K. Garg, appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that an application was filed on 6-12-1983 for bringing 3 documents on record, all of which are certified copies of judgments of various courts and therefore, are above suspicion. The application was rejected by the learned trial court on the ground that it is belated and that the affidavit filed in support of the application was not in terms of the application itself and no reasonable cause has been shown for filing the documents late. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel that the judgments relate to a suit fil...
Ram Singh Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-03-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)275
1. Petitioner was employed as conductor with the respondent Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (R.S.R.T.C). On 17-7-1983, when he was on duty on bus No. VCR 108 and the has was proceeding to Abu Road from Jodhpur, a 'nala' flowing at bus stand, Tehleti, a place falling in between Jodhpur and Abu Road, caused difficulty for 28 passengers to cross the 'nala'. The petitioner allowed those 28 passengers to board the bus. On checking the bus, 28 persons were found without tickets. Enquiry was held against the petitioner and his services were terminated vide Annexure 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that for a human act, he has been punished. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the RSRTC does not dispute the position that it was under these circumstances that 28 persons were permitted to board the bus. He, however, contested the writ petition on the ground that it was the duty of the conductor to ask those persons to purchase tickets first and then to board the bus. It is not disput...
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Kalu Ram and 2 ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-03-1987
Reported in: 1987WLN(UC)657
Vinod Shankar Dave, J.1. Learned Single Judge has referred a question of law which arose in this set of 29 Civil Second Appeals before him. The question referred to is as under:Whether the Civil Courts have jurisdiction to try such suits?2. The words 'such suits' used by the learned Single Judge in the question refers to suits which are filed by the employees of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (here in after referred to as 'the Corporation'), challenging either the pendency or the decision of departmental enquiries, instituted against them for their committing misconduct in the course of their employment and claiming their rights or liabilities under the general or common law. For better appreciation it would be relevant to mention the facts giving rise to one of the appeals. In Civil Second Appeal No. 215/83, R.S.R.T.C. v. Kaluram, the plaintiff-respondent was deployed as a Conductor on Bus No. RSG 2986. His bus was checked on January 31, 1978 and the checking staff found t...
Syed Abdul Basir Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: (1988)69CTR(Raj)209; [1988]170ITR566(Raj)
1. This reference made at the instance of the assessee is to answer the following questions of law, namely :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the property in question was not agricultural in the year of account ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that there was capital gain of Rs. 3,27,994? (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in including the said capital gains in the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration ' 2. The assessee has been assessed in the status of an individual. The relevant assessment year is 1965-66 corresponding to the financial year 1964-65. The assessee received compensation for compulsory acquisition of some land on Beawar Road at Ajmer amounting to Rs. 4,33,043. He was also paid interest thereon. The possession of land was taken on April 17, 1964, ...
Kane W/O Manguram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1987
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)483
V.S. Dave, J.1. The accused petitioner is a lady who have three minor children according to the certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat Sukot and as old mother-in-law aged 50 years, In the counter murder case the learned Sessions Judge has giants) indulgence to Mst. Chandra as she is a woman and the case is covered by provision is Section 437. Cr.P.C. As such I am inclined to grant indulgence to the accused petitioner.2. It is, therefore directed that accused petitioner Kane w/o Manga Ram be released on bail provided. She executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 100,000 (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties in the it mount-of Rs. 5000 - each to the satisfaction of the trial court with stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do during pendency of the trial against her in this case....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »