Rajasthan Court October 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raju Alias Rajendra Vs. Ratan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-06-1987
Reported in: 1988WLN(UC)2
J.S. Chopra, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned District Judge, Jodhpur dated 23-1-1987 whereby the learned District Judge has dissolved the marriage of the appellant and respondent under Section 13(2)(iv) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').2. The facts necessary to be noticed for disposal of the appeal briefly stated are that the wife-respondent filed an application for dissolution of her marriage with the hnsband-appelladt on July 3, 1985 pleading, inter alia that she was married with the husband-appellant Raju or Rajendra before about five years, i.e. at the time of the death of her great-grand mother that after marriage, she has never gone to her matrimonial home meaning thereby that her marriage has not been consumated, that even now, her age is 17 years and the has passed matriculation; that she is in a position to understand what is good for her and what is bad for her and that she does not like to keep her marital relations with ...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohan Giri
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-05-1987
Reported in: 1988WLN(UC)94a
S.S. Byas, J.1. By his judgment dated February 24, 1977, the learned Judicial Magistrate (4), Jodbpur convicted the accused Sohan Giri under Sections 279 and 337, IPC and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 50/-, in default of the payment of fine to undergo fifteen days' simple imprisonment on each count. The State has come-up in appeal for enhancement of the sentence.2. The accused-respondent, despite service of notice, did not put appearance. We have heard the learned Public Prosecutor.3. The offence was committed long back on June 17, 1975. The judgment was given by the Judicial Magistrate on February 24, 1977. Looking to the long lapse of ten years, it would not be proper to enhance the sentence. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed....
Nand Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-05-1987
Reported in: 1987(2)WLN868
Vinod Shanker Dave, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment of Sessions Judge, Ajmer, dated February 17, 1987, whereby the convicted the accused-appellant for offence under Section 8 read with Section 18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (here in after referred to as 'the Act') and sentenced him to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine the accused-appellant was ordered to suffer 1 year's further simple imprisonment.2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that a report was lodged at 2.55 a.m. on November 21, 1985 by Amanulla Khan a literate Head Constable G.R.P., police station, Ajmer wherein it was alleged by him that on the night intervening between 20th & 21st November, 1985 he had gone for general checking of smugglers and miscreants and went towards train 16 down at 2.45 a.m. on platform No. 2. No sooner the train steamed in and stopped he started keeping an eye on the move...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›