Rajasthan Court July 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Har Chand and Nand Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-05-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)252
Surendra Nath Bhargava, J.1. These two writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as they involve same point of law and are directed against the same order2. Petitioners were allotted lands in the year 1952 for temporary cultivation. The Rajasthan Colonization Act was promulgated in the year 1954 and the Rajasthan Colonization (Bhakra Project Government Lands Allotment & Sales) Rules, 1955, came into force in 1955.In 1956, petitioner moved application for permanent allotment. Naib Tehsildar & Tehsildar made a report that petitioners were not permanent residents, and, therefore, they were not entitled to the allotment of the lands on permanent basis. Petitioners appeared before the Deputy Director (Colonization) Hanumangarh and produced evidence before him to show that he was resident of Rajasthan whereupon Deputy Director Colonization remanded the case for holding inquiry. Tehsildar Suratgarh, after holding an inquiry submitted his report dated 18-10-1961 (Ex. 1) that petitio...
State Vs. Manji and 12 ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-02-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)181
1. These appeals are directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated November 3, 1972 where by the writ petitions were allowed and the demands raised by the Excise Department against the respondents were directed not to be realised from the respondents. It was further ordered that the amount of security confiscated by the Department for the nonpayment of the demand raised by the Department to pay the Excise duty on the unsold liquor may be returned to the petitioner-respondent. The learned Judge allowed the writ petitions in view of the decision in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1596/69 Bal Mukund v. State of Rajasthan, dated July 27, 1971.2. It may be stated here on merits, the order of the learned Single Judge is sustainable in view of the fact that the division Bench of this Court has reversed the aforesaid S.B. decision and the Division Bench decision has been affirmed by the Supreme Court in Pannalal v. State of Rajasthan reported in : [1976]1SCR219 .3. However, in thes...
Jai NaraIn S/O Hari Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-02-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)615
Dinkar Lal Mehta, J.1. This appeal arises against the judgment dated 24th April, 1984; passed by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption Cases, Jaipur, in Special Sessions Case No. 29 of 1979. Learned Special Judge has convicted the accused Under Section 165A, IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and, in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for 3 months.2. The brief facts of the ease are that on 10-9-1979 at about 8.30 a.m. the accused went at the residence of the State Minister for Education & submitted an application for appointment and also submitted that for a pretty long time he is facing un-employment, it is very difficult for him to lead with the life. The application has been marked as Ex. P 3. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant has submitted that looking to the circumstances prevalent in the society the applicant attached with the application Rs. 1,000/- and handed over to the pe...
Govind Singh Vs. Board of Revenue
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
Reported in: 1985(2)WLN663
Surendra Nath Bhargava, J.1. This writ petition has been directed against the order of the Board of Revenue dated May 17, 1977 dismissing the revision against the order dated May 5, 1976 of Collector, Sri Ganganagar.2. According to the petitioner he had been cultivating sq. No. 36, Chak No. 44 LXP measuring 24-1/2 bighas for the last about 25 years continuously. The petitioner applied for permanent allotment of the said land but the Sub-Divisional Officer, Karanpur refused to allot land to the petitioner. The petitioner preferred a revision before the Government of Rajasthan which directed the Collector to consider the petitioner's case for allotment. The Collector, Sri Ganganagar ultimately by his order dated April 26, 1971 allotted the said land to the petitioner. Originally the land was allotted in the name of one Veer Singh which was cancelled by the order dated September 23, 1967 and the land was allotted to non-petitioner No. 4 Saidas by the order dated September 25, 1967 and pos...
Govind Singh Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)186a
S.N. Bhargava, J.1. This writ petition has been directed against the order of the Board of Revenue dated May 17, 1977 dismissing the revision against the order dated May 5, 1976 of Collector, Sri Ganganagar.2. According to the petitioner he had been cultivating Sq. No. 36, Chak No. 44 IHP measuring 24-1/2 bighas for the last about 25 years continuously. The petitioner applied for permanent allotment of the said land but the Sub-Divisional Officer, Karanpur refused to allot land to the petitioner. The petitioner preferred a revision before the Government of Rajasthan which directed the Collector to consider the petitioner's case for allotment. The Collector, Sri Ganganagar ultimately by his order dated April 26, 1971 allotted the said land to the petitioner. Originally the land was allotted in the name of one Veer Singh which was cancelled by the order dated September 23, 1967 and the land was allotted to non-petitioner No. 4 Saidas by the order dated September 25, 1967 and possession o...
Bhanwar Lal and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)141
Kishore Singh Lodha, J.1. This revision has been filed by the accused-persons against the order of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Pali dated 19-11-1981 by which on a complaint filed by the non-petitioner No. 2 Ramchandra, the Munsif has taken cognizance of offence Under Section 427, 323 and 147, IPC, against them.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the record. Three contentions have been raised before me by the learned counsel for the petitioners. His first contention is that the learned Magistrate has not applied his mind properly to the material on record before taking cognizance against the petitioners. His second contention is that the learned Magistrate has not taken into consideration the fact, that the police has already filed a final report in connection with these very offences against the petitioners and his third contention is that the learned Magistrate has not recorded the reasons for ...
Mal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)317
Dinkar Lal Mehta, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2, Jaipur City dated 30th March, 1981. Learned District Judge convicted the appellant Under Section 366, in Sessions Case No 94/80 and sentenced both the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine, it was further directed that both the accused will undergo six months rigorous imprisonment.2. Brief facts of the case, as alleged by the prosecution are that on 30th August, 1980, about 12 in noon, accused appellant Mal Singh went at the house of prosecutrix and committed rape. It is an admitted position that no first information report about the commission of the rape has been lodged separately. It is further alleged that at about 8 to 9 p.m. in night, when prosecutrix Sarju and her mother were sitting outside the house, both the accused lifted prosecutrix Sarju and took her away. First Information Report Under Section 366 wa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›