Rajasthan Court August 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govind Ram Vs. Chittar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1983
Reported in: 1983WLN624
D.L. Mehta, J.1. The petitioner purchased the agricultural land bearing Khasra No. 2 Min. measuring 26 bighas 9 biswas situate in village Hathnapur from Chittar and Kalu sons of Chhagna Meena resident of Hathnapur vide registered sale deed dated March 24, 1969 for valuable consideration of Rs. 8.000/-. This fact has been mentioned by the petitioner in para 2 of the writ petition. He has further submitted that the land was purchased on Chait Budi 4, Samvat 20 0 from Chhagna, the father of Kalu and Chittar by way of sale for a sum of Rs. 4,000/-. The petitioner has produced Annexure-2 the document which is on a plain paper and there is a reference that the sale was made for the sum of Rs. 4,000/-. It has also been shown that it bears the thumb impression of Chhagna. The sale-deed dated March 24, 1969 was produced by the learned Counsel for the petitioner during the course of arguments. In the sale deed dated March 24, 1969, there is no reference of ihe previous sale alleged to have taken...
The State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramdayal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1983
Reported in: 1983WLN679
S.C. Agarwal, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the State against the judgment dated 25th April, 1973 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in Criminal Appeal No. 110/72. By his judgment aforesaid the Sessions Judge allowed the appeal filed by Ramdayal respondent against the judgment dated 10th November, 1972 passed by the Municipal Magistrate 1st Class Jodhpur convicting the said respondent of the offence under Section 7/6 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'.) and sentencing him to simple imprisonment for a period of nine months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1200/- and in the event of non payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. The Sessions Judge, while setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the respondent, guashed the proceedings and discharged the respondent.2. The facts, briefly stated, are that the respondent was a vendor of 'Kulfi'. (milk ice cream) in a hand cart. The licence for sale o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›