Rajasthan Court December 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manak Ram Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-02-1983
Reported in: 1983WLN(UC)464
S.S. Vyas, J.1. This appeal by accused Manak Ram is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur dated May 19, 1977, convicting the appellant Under Section 302, IPC and sentencing him to imprisonment for life.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the accused is a real nephew of the deceased-victim Pattu Ram. Pattu Ram was residing with his son PW 4 Pukha Ram in a Dhani situate nearby village Lohawat district Jodhpur. The accused had committed a theft in the house of Pukha Ram, for which he was prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment. He was released from Sub Jail, Phalodi on 9-11-76 and met on that day to PW 6 Bhera Ram of Lohawat near the railway station, Phalodi. During talks with him, the accused told that he would finish Pattu Ram. Bhera Ram advised him not to do so. The accused then left the place. In the interventing night between 9-11-78 and 10-11-76, Pattu Ram and his son PW 4 Pukha Ram were sleeping in the Sal of their Dhani. In the mid-night...
imamuddIn Vs. Ayub Khan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1983
Reported in: 1984CriLJ117
ORDERK.S. Sidhu, J.1. This is an application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973(for short. Cr. P. C.) for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused, Ayub Khan and Chand Khan, by the learned Sessions Judge. Jaipur City, Jaipur, and for a further order that they be arrested and committed to custody. The case of the prosecution and the circumstances leading to the filing of this application may be stated as follows.2. Mst. Khatoon. a young woman, 22 years of age, was found dead in her matrimonial home. No. 3123. Tookhana Hazari Ramgani Jaipur on January 26. 1981, at about 2 P. M. Her husband Ayub Khan, one of the co-accused-respondents, reported her death to the police at 7 P. M., alleging that she had committed suicide by hanging herself with a rope earlier that day between 12 Noon and 2 P. M. He went to the police station. Ramgani in Jaipur City 5i hours after the death of Khatoon carrying a pre-written report with him. The report says that when he return...
State Farms Corporation of India Limited Vs. Rajendra Taneja
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1983
Reported in: 1983WLN(UC)314
D.L. Mehta, J.1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the award dated May 1, 1982 passed by the Labour Judge, Bikaner, Petitioner has raised only two points before me during the course of argument; (i) that the State Government was not appropriate authority, as defined Under Section 2(e) read with Section 14 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to make the reference; and (ii) that the labour Court was not justified in granting the relief of re-instatement and 50% salary.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the case of Som Prakash v. Union of India . The relevant portion of Head Note 'A' leads as under:The preponderant considerations for pronouncing an entity as State agency or instrumentality are (i) financial resources of the State being the chief funding source (ii) functional charter being governmental in essence, (iii) plenary control residing in Government, (iv) prior history of the same activity having been carried on by Government ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›