Rajasthan Court June 1981 Judgments
Smt. Gyarsi Devi Vs. SaIn Das and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Raj30; [1983]54CompCas333(Raj)
S.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Section 110-B of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), by Smt. Gyarsi Devi (hereinafter referred to as 'the Claimant' against the award, dated 18th December, 1975, made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Claims Tribunal') in Civil Miscellaneous (M. A. C.) Case No. 2 of 1971. In the case aforesaid, the claimant had claimed a sum of Rs. 50,000/- as compensation on account of death of her son. Om. The Claims Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs. 30,600 as compensation to the claimant against Bashir Ahmed, respondent No. 2, but has dismissed the said claim as against Sain Das, respondent No. 1, and the New India Assurance Company Limited, respondent No. 3.2. The aforesaid claim relates to an accident which took place on 16th Aug. 1970 at about 5.15 p. m. at Ramganj Chopar in Jaipur City. The case of the claimant is that at the time of the accident, the deceaced Om and Om ...
Tag this Judgment!Jaswant Singh, Sewaram and Pratap Singh Vs. State Transport Appellate ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-29-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)217
G.M. Lodha, J.1. Jawant Singh, petitioner, a holder of a non temporary stage carriage permit on Churu to Dhirasar route, has filed this writ petition with the following prayer:that the writ petition may kindly be accepted and a writ, in the nature of certiorari or other writ, order or direction which may be deemed just and expedient in the circumstances of the case be kindly issued and set aside the aforesaid order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur dated 8-1-1981 and the impugned resolution of the Regional Transport Authority, Bikaner dated 6-11-1979 be kindly ordered to be restored. Any other relief which may be deemed just and expedient in the circumstances of the case be kindly granted. Cost of this writ petition may kindly be ordered to be awarded to the petitioner.2. Petitioners' permit was valid upto 31st December, 1979. The petitioner submitted a renewal application for the said permit before 120 days of the expiry date, as required by Section 58(2) of the Motor ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State Transport Appella ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-19-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)212
G.M. Lodha, J.1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter 'the Corporation'), has filed this writ petition against the decision of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur with the following prayer:that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to accept this writ petition, call for the record of the case and issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature thereof quashing and setting aside the impugned order of the Tribunal dated the 5th September 1980 (Annexure 3) and the said order be quashed and set aside and the resolution of the Regional Transport Authority dated the 8th May, 1980 pronounced on May 26, 1980 be restored and grant of the permit to the petitioner be maintained, and the renewal of the permit of the respondent No. 3 be refused.Issue any other appropriate writ, direction, or order in the nature thereof granting suitable relief in the facts and circumstances of the case.2. It would be necessary to first ...
Tag this Judgment!Amritlal Vs. State of Raj. and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-03-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)457
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1 This special appeal under s. 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance has been filed by Amritlal, who was the petitioner in the petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, against the order of the learned Single Judge, who dismissed the petition by his order dated August 30, 1971. The petitioner had prayed in the writ petition that the order, (Ex. 6) dated. April 18, 1969, by which he was dismissed from service and the order (Ex. 7) dated May 4, 1971, by which his appeal against that order was dismissed, may be quashed and that he may be re-instated with all emoluments and benefits arising out of it. The writ petition was filed on July 5, 1971.2. The petitioner-appellant at the relevant time was working as substantive Compositor (Gr. 1) in the Government Press, Jodhpur. The memo, charge sheet and the statement of allegations are Ex. 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The charge against the petitioner was that he travelled by railway on government business in Clas...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›