Rajasthan Court April 1981 Judgments
Parag Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1244; 1981()WLN274
Mahendra Bhushan, J.1. Accused Parag aged about 22 years, has been convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (2), Jaipur City, Jaipur, and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life,2. Mahavir Prasad (PW4) is the father of Raiesh, a boy aged about 12 years. The accused Parag is the real sister's son of Mahavir Prasad. Mahavir, Prasad (PW4) and his sister, i. e., the mother of the accused, were partners in a business M. P, Sales Corporation, Station Road, Jaipur. Rajesh (deceased) at the relevant time was studying in Mahavir School, Mahavir Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur in 6th Class. In the month of April, 1978, his annual examinations were going on. On April 26. 1978, he had his examination of Sanskrit Paper. Mahavir Prasad (PW 4), his father, left Raiesh on his scooter at the school at about 9-30 A. M as his paper was to commence from 10 A. M, It was a routine with Raiesh to return to the shop of his father situated at Station Road, Jaipur, or to h...
Tag this Judgment!Urban Improvement Trust Vs. Narbada Devi
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1981
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1695; 1981()WLN467
N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. This is an appeal by the Urban Improvement Trust, Alwar against an order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Alwar. The facts in brief are that a scheme No. 11 was published under Section 32 of the Raiasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by the Urban Im- provement Trust, Alwar. The accused non-petitioner Smt. Nanbada Devi made certain constructions over the land covered by Scheme No. 11 and a report in this regard was submitted by the Inspector on 22nd September. 1971. In pursuance to the above report of the Inspector, a notice under Section 90 of the Act, was issued on 23rd September, 1971, in the name of Smt Narbada Devi wife of Shri Vishnu Datt Sharma, Pat-wari. Hazuri Gate, Alwar. This notice was accepted by Shri V. D. Sharma husband of Smt. Narbada Devi on 29th September, 1971. As the accused non-petitioner d(id not stop the constructions, a complaint was filed, against her under Section 91 of...
Tag this Judgment!Chandrasingh and ors. Vs. the Board of Revenue and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN666
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. By these two separate writ petitions, Chandersingh and the State of Rajasthan, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek to quash the order (Anx. 8) dated August 13, 1974 of the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan (here in after referred to as 'the Board').2. A few facts leading to these petitions may briefly be noticed. The Government of Rajasthan gave on lease a large contract of land about 33,00 acres to the Central Government for a period of 16 years from 1955 to 1971 for the purpose of establishing a mechanized farm The Central Government had option to get the lease extended for a further period of 15 years on the same terms and conditions. The Central State Farm, Suratgarh (for short 'the Farm' herein) was rug by the Central Government through the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Government of India, from 1960 to 1969. It is said that in the year 1969, an autonomous Corporation in the name of the state Farms Corporation of India Ltd. (a Government of In...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›