Rajasthan Court December 1981 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surjeet Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-02-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)332
D.P. Gupta, Actg. C.J.1. This writ petition has been filed against an order transferring the petitioner from Bikaner division to Lucknow Division of the Northern Railway. The order of transfer was passed by the Senior Personnel Officer, Northern Railway New Delhi on July 13, 1981 and was communicated to the petitioner by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Bikaner by his notice dated July 13,1981.2. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that there was a divisional cadre of Travelling Ticket Examiners (hereinafter called 'the T.T. Es.') and that transfer outside the division was not permissible. Reliance was placed on a decision of the Delhi High Court in Prem Parveen v. Union of India 1971 SLR page 659. In that case, it was alleged that the Directorate of Extention and office of the Regional Station were two separate cadre and the respondents conceded in their return that they constituted two separate cadres. It was on the basis of the admis...
Dinesh Khare Vs. Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1981
Reported in: (1982)IILLJ17Raj; 1981()WLN678
S.C. Agarwal, J.1. This writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 14th Dec. 1971, passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur thereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), whereby the Tribunal gave its approval to the action of the management of the ' Daily Rashtradoot ' ( hereinafter referred to as 'the management'') dismissing the petitioner from service.2. 'Rashtradoot', is a daily Hindi news- paper published from Jaipur. The petitioner, Dinesh Khare, joined 'Rashtradoot' in September, 1951, and he was appointed as Editor of the said newspaper in May, 1952. When he was employed as editor of the 'Rashtradoot' the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet dated 27th January, 1967 containing charges of misconduct and he was required to submit his explanation to the said charges. The petitioner submitted his expl...
Bairilal Vs. Rich Ram
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN633
G.M. Lodha, J.1. A typical rackless negligence of non filing of written statement for 15 months, after about a dozen adjournment including there with costs resulting in exparte proceedings, and yet invoking revisional jurisdiction to put premium on such lethargy, inaction and negligence by making the counsel scapgoat for setting aside exparte order, is the extra ordenary prayer in this petition under Section 115 C.P.C.2. And now the facts: A suit for ejectment was filed by the plaintiff. The defendant who is the petitioner before this Court put up appearance on February 11,1980, though Mr. P. Gadaria and prayed for time to file written statement.3. The defendant having failed to file written statement, another adjournment was granted on payment of cost of Rs. 15/--, but on May 27, 1980, no written statement was filed and the case was adjourned to August 12, 1980 to enable the petitioner to file written statement. The defendant having failed to file written statement was granted yet ano...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›