Rajasthan Court August 1980 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kishan Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-08-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN647
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgement dated April, 1978, of learned Sessions Judge, Kota, whereby the accused appellant Kishan son of Gordhan Singh was convicted on the charge of murder of Balli Sardar allias Amarjeet Singh and was sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default of payment of fine to further rigorous imprisonment for two months.2. The prosecution story in nut-shell is that Kailash Chandra PW 1 runs a betel shop in the name and style of Pawan Pan Bhandar situated near the temple of Mori-Ka-Hanumanji in Purani Dhandmandi, Kota. His brother Subhash's hotel is situated adjacent to his shop. In the morning of the fateful day Kailash Chandra and his brother Subhash reached their respective shops. Jugal Kishore (PW3) and Ramesh (PW4) were sitting on the wooden platform of the said shop of Kailash Chandra. Narain a servant of Subhash served tea to Jugal Kishore and Ramesh. He then went away to serve tea at the office of Ram ...
Soni Vs. Dhannaram
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-1980
Reported in: 1981CriLJ547; 1980()WLN421
ORDERS.N. Deedwania, J.1. This revision is preferred by petitioner Smt. Soni wife of Dhannaram against the order, dated June 9, 1976 of learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate. Jodhpur District, Jodhpur dismissing her application for maintenance.2. Briefly stated the facts are these. Smt. Soni was legally wedded wife of non-petitioner Dhannaram. In the month of Jan., 1968 Dhannaram turned her out from his house and she had to live with her parents. The petitioner, thereafter, moved an application for maintenance under Section 488, Cr. P.C. in the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jodhpur on 4-6-1968 on the ground that she was unable to maintain herself. The petition was contested and the defence was that according to the custom, the petitioner was divorced on 11-3-1968 and a divorced wife could not claim maintenance. Somehow, the petition dragged on and in the meantime Cr, P. C, 1973 came into force. The case was, thereafter, transferred to the Court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate,...
Bano Vs. Abdul Salam
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN426
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. Petitioner Mst. Bano has preferred this revision against the order, dated March 11, 1980 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in criminal revisions No. 108 of 1979 and 116 of 1979.2. Briefly stated the facts for disposal of the petition are these. Petitionner Mst. Bano was married to non-petitioner Abdulsalam on 8-1-75 On 14-6-77 Abdul salam turned out Mst. Bano from his house. Since, then, Mst. Bano and her minor son have been living with her parents. On 24-1-79, she filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') for maintenance and claimed a sum of Rs. 300/- per month for herself and her minor son Non-petitioner Abdulsalam contested the application inter alia on the ground that on 12-2-80, he gave customary divorce to Mst. Bano and paid her a sum of Rs. 25/- as Maher and, therefore, she was not entitled to any maintenance. The application for interim maintenance by the petitioner was opposed m...
The Notified Area Committee Rawat Bhata and anr. Vs. G.D. Mehta and or ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)297
K.D. Sharma, Actg. C.J.1. This is a D B. Special Appeal Sled by the Notified Area Committee, Rawat Bhata and another, arising out of an order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated July 15, 1980. passed in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1945 of 1979 filed by G.D Mehta against the State of Rajasthan and Ors. This appeal came up for admission before us on July 29, 1980. We heard Mr. H N Calla, Additional Government Advocate, for the appellant and Mr. Marudhar Mridul appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1. Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and perusing the record we arc of the view that this appeal is not worth admission for the following reasons The State Government vide its Notification dated February 28, 1975, which was published in the Rajasthan Raj Patra, dated March 6, 1975 signified its intention to declare revenue village Rawat Bhata as a Notified Area in exercise of its powers under Section 313 (1) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, hereinafter referred ...
Khalil and ors. Vs. the Assistant Engineer
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-05-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)327
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. This revision is preferred against the Judgment dated July 27, 1977 of the learned District Judge, Bikaner, whereby he partly accepted the appeal of the non-petitioner in a claim under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act).2. Briefly stated the facts are these. The petitioners submitted a claim under Sections 15(2) and 16 of the Act for overtime wages for the period between 1st of June, 1972 to 31st of July, 1972 against the respondent before the learned Authority appointed under the Act. (sic)The non-petitioner employed the petitioners to work on Pump Station of the Rajasthan Canal Project, Chhaturgarh, Bikaner and during the relevant period they remained on duty at the Pump Station round the block. The learned authority directed the non-petitioner to pay to the petitioners overtime wages for 16 hours per day from 1-6.(sic)72 to 31-7(sic)72 The non-petitioner preferred an appeal be/ore the District Judge, who as already stated partl...
Balkishan Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-05-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)415
M.B. Sharma, J.1. This is an application under Section 482 Gr. P.O. by the accused-appellant, praying that the order (sic)affi ming the conviction of the appellant recorded on 15-11-78 against the appellant by this Court (Sidhu J), be recalled because the appeal was heard without any notice to the appellant or his Advocate.2. Petitioner, Balkishan was tried and convicted by the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption Department), Rajasthan, Jaipur under Sub-Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act Under both the counts, he was sentenced to undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/. In defaut of payment of fine so further undergo two months rigorous imprisonment for each default.3. Against the judgment of the Trial Court an aypeal was preferred by the accused-petitioner at Jodhpur in the year 1973. He was represented one by Mr. R P. Vvas, a Lawyer who is practising at Jodhpur. The Beech of the Rajasthan High Court was (sic)eiCablished a...
Banwarilal Vs. Ratan Bihari Tyagi
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)352
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. This appeal is filed by Banwarilal appellant against the order, dated February 17, 1975 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No. 2, Kota, acquitting the respondent of the offence under Section 23(1) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The relevant facts are these. The appellant is tenant of the respondent, who for ulterior motive of evicting the appellant wish held water and electricity amenities on 4-10-72 from the tenanted premises. The appellant moved an application under Section 12 of the Act for the restoration of the amenities, in the court of City Magistrate, Kota, who on 8/12 2 73 gave an interim order directing the respondent to restore the amenities within 10 days on the condition of payment of Rs. 67-28 to respondent pending the disposal of application under Section 12 of the Act The appellant sent a money order for Rs 42/- only to the respondent, which his refused to accept and did ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›