Rajasthan Court May 1980 Judgments
Sanjay Lobo Vs. the University of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-28-1980
Reported in: AIR1981Raj69; 1980()WLN522
ORDERMahendra Bhushan, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the respondent cancelling the examination of the petitioner held in May-June, 1979 for B. Sc. (Hons) (Physics) Part II, on the ground that the petitioner used unfair means in the examination.2. The petitioner was a student of B. Sc. (Hons) (Physics) Part II (Three Years scheme) and was pursuing this course of study in Maharaja College, Jaipur. He appeared in B. Se. (Hons) (Physics) Part II examination in May-June, 1979 with Roll No. 161. On June 18, 1979 the petitioner had to appear in Chemistry Subsidiary Paper HI from 3 to 6 P. M. While he was appearing in the examination, at about 5.35 P. M. the Flying Squad took search of the examinees including the petitioner, who were suspected of using unfair means, and sufficient material relating to Chemistry-Subsidiary Paper III was found in the pocket of the petitioner inside the coat which was buttoned up, The Invigilator and the Superintendent examination refer...
Tag this Judgment!Pusha Ram Vs. Modern Construction Co. (P) Ltd., Kota
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1980
Reported in: AIR1981Raj47; 1980()WLN508
Mahendra Bhushan, J.1. Though the appeals arise out of separate suits, in which separate judgments have been passed, but they relate to the same Royalty Collection Contract, and some of issues are common. Therefore, it will be convenient to dispose of these appeals by a common judgement.2. I will first narrate the facts of the case.3. A notice-was published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated May 25, 1961, under Rule 3(5 (1) of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) for grant of several royalty collection contracts ending on March 31, 1963 for a period of two years. We are presently concerned with item No. 30 of the said notification regarding royalty collection contract for ordinary sand and building stones excavated from the quarries in 12 villages of Tehsil, Bhanerorgarh, mentioned therein. The auction took place on June 22, 1961, and the bid of Pusharam (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) of Rupees 3,351/-, being the highest, the...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Rajasthan Vs. Bhawani Singh Former His Highness and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN295
M.L. Shrimal, J.1.This special appeal taken under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, is directed against the judgment dated May 2, 1977, of learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1739 of 1973.2. The petitioner's case before learned Single Judge was that there used to be a village known as Bhojpura, Tehsil Jaipur. Its entire land forms part of Jaipur City. This village had been granted in 'Bhog' by the former State of Jaipur to seven temples. Before the formation of the United State of Rajasthan the erstwhile State of Jaipur had acquired from time to time the following chunks of land forming part of village Bhojpura:(a) For Race Course-119 Bighas, in 1938 A.D.,(b) For Ram Bagh Palace, 99 Bighas 4 Biswas, In 1936 A.D.,(c) For Man Guard Barracks, 28 Bighas (now known as Secretariat building),(d) For the Palace to Shri Maharaj Kumar Singhji 144 Bighas 4 Biswas in 1944 A.D.(e) For Improvement Scheme, 19 Bighas 10 Biswas, in 1944 A.D.Th...
Tag this Judgment!Ghanshyam Vs. University of Udaipur and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)175
M.C. Jain, J.1. The petitioner, by this writ petition, seeks to quash the Notification No. Exam./Deb/79/3434-3683 dated October 12, 1979, issued by the Registrar, University of Udaipur, Udaipur, where by the petitioner's M.A. Sociology I Semester Examination (in course No. 514(8) Sociology) was cancelled and he was further debarred from appearing in three subsequent Semesters, to pursuance of the decision of the Executive Committee held on 11-10-1979, as the petitioner was found guilty of using unfair mean, at the Examination held on 21-7-1979.2. The petitioner's case is that she petitioner was served notice Annexure 1 dated September 10, 1979, whereby he was interned that a report had been received from the Centre of Examination to the effect that of July 21, 1979, he was found copying from a paper which was lying below his copy and paper. While taking away that paper, he resisted and because of that paper was torn into two pieces. He was further informed that the examiner concerned a...
Tag this Judgment!Suwalal Vs. Meghraj and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-09-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)256
K.D. Sharma, J.1. This is a second appeal filed by Suwalal, against the decree and judgment of the learned Civil Judge, Sojat dated March 30, 1970 by which the judgment and the decree of the Munsif Jetaran dated November 8, 1968 were modified to the extent that the order for closure of the door and the perpetual injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff with regard to it were set aside.2. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal may be briefly stated as follows Suwa Lal and Prithvi Raj, plaintiffs instituted a suit against Megh Raj, Inderchand and Prem Raj defendants for grant of mandatory and prohibitory injunction in the court of learned Munsif, Jetaran on March 9, 1966. The averment in the plaint were that the plaintiffs and their brothers own and possess three houses in a narrow lane situated in the Mohalla of Sharabji's at Village Nimbaj. In between the two houses of the plaintiffs there is the backside wall of the house of the defendants, which is shown in green colour i...
Tag this Judgment!Bherulal and anr. Vs. Mohanlal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-08-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)167
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. This is a second appeal by defend ants-appellants Bherulal and Ambalal against the Judgment and decree, dated November 1, 1969 of the learned Additional Civil judge, Udaipur, dismissing their appeal against the judgment and preliminary decide petted by the learned Munsif Magistrate, Kanore, In favour of the plaintiffs respondents for redemption of the suit property.2. The facts relevant to the disposal of this second appeal are these According to the plaintiffs-respondents, Brijlal mortgaged with possession the suit-shop with the defendants by a registered mortgage-deed on 12-10-59 for a sum of Rs. 700/-. Brijlal then sold this shop to the plaintiffs on 23-10-62 under a registered sale deed. On 6-7-65, plaintiffs served a notice on the defendants for redemption of the shop and thereafter filed a suit. It appears that Brijlal had died before filing the suit and, therefore, it was filed against defendants-appellants Bherulal and Ambalal sons of the mortgagor of the s...
Tag this Judgment!Kesardeo Vs. Smt. Bhooridevi and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-08-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)171
S.N. Deedwania, J.1. This is a second appeal by plaintiff appellant Kesardeo filed against the judgment and decree, dated April 24, 1972 of the learned Additional District Judge. Churu, in Civil First Appeal No. 7 of 1971 by which, the judgment and decree for ejectment passed by the learned Munsif Magistrate, Churu was reversed.2. The facts relevant to the disposal of this appeal are these. The defendants respondents were the tenants of the suit-house situated in Churu under a rent-note dated March 28, 1945. The tenancy was monthly and rent was payable at Rs. 40/- per annum yearly. On 21-4-66, the plaintiff-appellant purchased the suit house from the original owner and land-lord for a sum of Rs. 5,700/ under a registered sale-deed. On 25-6-66, the plaintiff-appellant gave notice to the defendant for terminating their tenancy with effect from July 27, 1966 or in the alternative, with effect from any date between 20-7-66 to 17-8-66, on which date, the tenancy expired according to them. O...
Tag this Judgment!HussaIn Vs. Babulal and Shivraj and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-08-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)188
K.D. Sharma, J.1. This Is a civil second appeal Sled by Hussain defendant-appellant against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge Pali dated 29-1-70 by which the decree and judgment of the learned Munsif Jetaran dated 9-4-66 was set aside and the sale of the disputed land in favour of Jasraj predecessor-in-title of Hussain defendant by the Panchayat was declared null and void and the deed of sale executed in his favour was cancelled and Hussain was declared not entitled to put his stones on the land and was directed to remove them.2. The relevant facts giving rise to the suit out of which this second appeal arises maybe briefly stated as follows:- There is a piece of land comprising Khasra No. 387 and situated in village Bar. This piece of land was shown as agricultural land in the revenue record. Later on vide order of the Collector No. CA/4943 dated 3-8-57 it was converted into Abadi land. The averments in the plaint filed by plaintiff-respondents were that this piece...
Tag this Judgment!Shauker Lal Mali Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN459
D.P. Gupta, J.1. The petitioner Shankerlal was employed as a workcharged Nakedar in the Mining Department of the State of Rajasthan by the order dated October 11, 1968. He was a daily rated employee getting Rs. 3/ per pay. As he became surplus to the requirement of the Mining Department, his services were terminated by the order of the Mining Engineer, Jaipur dated November 21, 1970. Later on, taking a sympathetic view, the State Government referred his case to the General Administration Department and then he was appointed afresh as a Chowkidar in the Mining Department by the order dated December 8, 1970, again as a workcharged daily rated employee getting Rs. 3/- per day. Shankerlal joined his new duties on December 9, 1970. From the post of Chowkidar he was transferred tO the post of workcharged Nakedar wish effect from January 1, 1972 and he continued to receive the same emoluments of Rs. 3/ per day, as a daily rated employee. A show cause notice for taking disciplinary action agai...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Rajasthan Vs. Sardara and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-1980
Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)204
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The respondents were tried for the offences under Sections 148, 342/149 and 452, Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sirohi, who by his judgment dated May 25, 1970 acquitted all the five respondents of the charges levelled against them. Dissatisfied with the judgment of acquittal the State of Rajas than has preferred this appeal.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case leading to the trial of the respondents are under: The thrashing-floor belonging to Achla (p.w.9), at village noza Navakheda was being used by the deceased Amar Singh. In the year of occurrence, that is, 1967, Achla gave that thrashing floor to respondent Sardara for `lata' and this led to bad blood between Amar Singh and Sardara as a result of which on March 12, 1967 at about sun-set the five respondents armed with `Dharia, Chhuris' and sword left for the house of Amarsingh deceased. On the way, they met Bhoor Singh (p.w.2), outside his house. Considering him to be an associate of Am...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›