Rajasthan Court April 1979 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Jeewan Kumari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1979
Reported in: [1979]118ITR573(Raj)
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution comes up today for admission.2. Mr. Sagar Mal Mehta has put in appearance of behalf of respondents Nos. 1 to 5.3. Mr. Mridul states that the other respondents Nos. 6 to 11 are merely pro forma respondents to the writ petition inasmuch as their interest is identical with that of the petitioner.4. After having heard learned counsel for the parties for some time we felt inclined to admit the case for hearing.5. Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that since the point involved in the case is a short one, it would be proper to dispose of it today. This case may, therefore, be treated as one for hearing.6. Accordingly, we have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length. The facts of the case are few and simple. The petitioner, Jeewan Kumari, is a partner of the firm, M/s. R.S. Metal Industries, which is an assessee for purposes of income-tax. The Case No. GIR 30-001-FN-3505 : M/s. R.S. Metal Industries was disposed o...
The State Vs. Bhabhootmal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-1979
Reported in: 1979WLN(UC)176
1. This is an appeal by the State directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Pali, dated March 9, 1971 whereby the respondents except respondent Chunni Lal were acquitted of the offences under Sections 148, 302/149 and 201/149 Indian Penal Code. Respondents Jethu Singh and Malamsingh were further charged under Sections 323 and 324 Indian Penal Code respectively but were also acquitted of the same. Respondent Mohan Singh was further charged under Section 379 IPC but was not found guilty. Respondent Chunnilal was charged only with an offence under Section 212 IPC and was acquitted of it.2. The prosecution case, briefly stated was as under : The incident took place on March 7, 1968 between 10-11 p.m. in village Bisalpur near a water trough of a well known as 'Dadawadi'. Formerly the village was in the Jagir of Prithvi Singh before its resumption after the formation of the Rajasthan State. Near the village, there is compact tract of land measuring about 2000 bighas known ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›