Rajasthan Court August 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hindustan Copper Ltd. Vs. the Central Industrial Tribunal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-03-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN707
N.M. Kasliwal, J.1. The petitioner is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act and is a undertaking if the Government of India & carries on business of mining of copper ore and its processing far production of copper metal. It has employed a large number of labourers The Labourers have formed a union known as Rashtriya Khetri Tamba Mazdur Sangh. The respondent No 2 was working as a helper (Mechnical) in one of the establishment of the petitioner. As the respondent No. 2 absented from his duties without obtaining prior permission for leave he was warned on several occasions and entries to this effect were also entered in service roll It is further alleged in the writ petition that the respondent No. 2 not only remain-id absent from his duties without leave on various dates between 30th March, 1974, to 5th April, 1975 but on 5th April, 1975, he entered the office room of the Personnel Officer at the Central Office arid mis-behaved with him and also threatened him with dire con...
Karan Singh Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN317
M.L. Joshi, J.1. In the six writ petitions each of the petitioners seek to challenge the impugned judgment of the Board of Revenue passed in each case and pray for quashing the impugned judgment in respective cases.2. Each of the petitioners had obtained 'decree in his favour which was not appealed against and the decree became final. Despite appeals having rot been filed against the respective decrees the Collector made reference under Section 23/ of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, hereinafter called the Tenancy Act for setting aside the decree passed in various suits ii favour of the respective petitioners. The Revenue Board entertained the reference and set aside the respective decrees. It is in these circumstances that the petitioners challenge the judgment of the Revenue Board in these cases and pray for quashing the same.3. The petitioners have challenged the judgment of the Revenue Board amongst other on the ground that neither the Collector was competent to make a reference under Se...
Jagdish Vs. Collector
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1978
Reported in: 1978WLN(UC)319
D.P. Gupta, J.1. This writ petition was taken up today for final hearing with the. consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner, in this case, has urged that the Collector, Sri Ganganagar has passed as order dated April 28, 1978 (Annexure 4) terminating the lease (Theka) of the petitioner for the year 1978-79 without giving any mice to him and that the said order should be quashed by this Court as it was passed against the principles of natural justice.3. The petitioner's case is that the land mentioned in schedule A, attached to the writ petition, situated in village Mainawali, was given to him on lease for a period of three years from the year 1976-77, at the rate of 500/- perbigha by a resolution of the Gram Panchayat, Mainawali dated October 1, 1976 after it was kinked down in his favour at a public auction held on August 4, 1976 and that while he was enjoying the possession of the aforesaid land, and was cultivating the same, the Collector. Sri Ganganagar passe...
Bhagwana Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN557
K.S. Sidhu, J.1. This is a petition of appeal presented by the convict, namely, Bhagwana through the Superintendent of Jail, Jaipur, from a judgment & order, dated November 13, 1976, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu, whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced as under:(i) five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000/- or in default further rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 304 Part II IPC relating to the death of Malaram.(ii) two months rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 IPG relating to the hurt caused to PW Matu Ram.The two sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. The case of the prosecution resulting in the convictions and sentences as aforesaid was that on July 26, 1976, at about 2 p.m. in village of Dhani Othooni Police Station Jhunjhunu, the children of Bhagwana accused on one side and his brother PW Matu Ram on the other quarreled amongst themselves. The quarrel escalated to the extent of involvement of their women foil ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›