Rajasthan Court June 1978 Judgments
Bhopal Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-23-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN228
S.K.M. Lodha, J.1. This is an application for the grant of anticipatory bail filed by Bhopal Singh son of Guman Singh and Bhanwar Singh son of Prabhu Singh, who have reason to believe that they may be arrested on accusations of having committed offences under Sections 147 143, 149, and 307, IPC.2. A first information report was lodged oh 28th May, 1978 against them and three others by Jas Raj son of Bhairon Singh of Sheotalab stating that when he and Harilal resident of Sheotalab were standing in front of Anop Mandir, bus stand of Mundara, at about 1.30 pm. Ranjeet Singh son of Bhopalsingh, Bhanwarsingh son of Prabhusingh, Bhopalsingh son of Adring an Bhopal Singh son of Gaman Singh came near them and they were armed with weapons Ranjeet Singh had a 'Kulhari in has hand, whereas Bhanwar Singh had a 'Dharia' and the remaining three persons had lathis in their hands They came there with an intention to kill Hari Lal and attacked him The complainant, Jas Raj, after going at some distance,...
Tag this Judgment!Bhopalsingh and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-23-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN349
S.K.M. Lodha, J.1. This, is an application for, the grant, of anticipatory bail filed by Bhopal Singh son of Guman Singh, and Bhanwar Singh son of Prabhu Singh, who haw reasons to believe that they may be arrested on accusations of having committed offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, and 307 I.P.C,2. A first information report was lodged on May 28, 1978 against them and three others by Jas Raj s/o Bhairon Singh of Sheotalab stating that when he one Harilal resident of Sheotaiab were standing in front of Anop Mandir, bus Stand of Mundara, at about 1.30 p.m. Ranjeet Singh son,of Bhopal Singh, Bhanwar Singh son of Prabhu Singh, Bhppalsingh s/o Adrin & Bhopal Singh son of Guman Singh came near them and they were armed with weapons. Ranjeet Singh had a 'Kulhari' in his hand, where as Bhanwar Singh had a 'Dharia'and the remaining three persons had lathis in their hands. They came there with an intention to. kill Hari Lal & attacked him The complainant, Jas Raj, after going at some distanc...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Rakh Vyas Vs. Atal Behari Vajpayee Minister for External Affairs a ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-09-1978
Reported in: 1978(11)WLN304
G.M. Lodha, J.1. Having heard Mr. M.C. Bhoot at length & after considering the constitutional provisions relating to issues involved in this case, I am of the opinion that the issues raised are of far reaching constitutional importance. They also involve serious Consideration of the respective sphere of juri diction of judiciary and the legislative wing of the State Slightest lack of mature consideration tin either side has also got the potentiality of sparkling a controversy between the above two wings of the State as happened in Uttar Pradesh in 1964 in Keshav Singh's case.2. The precedents are not many and the decision is likely to be of far reaching consequences both in the sphere of constitutional law and may have some repercussions in the sphere of International Law too. The stakes being too high, there arises necessity of a comprehensive detailed consideration of them by a larger Bench of this Court I have therefore come to the conclusion, that I should not embark upon the uphil...
Tag this Judgment!Aladeen Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-07-1978
Reported in: 1978WLN(UC)546
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. This jail appeal filed by accused Aladeen son of Gani is directed against the judgment dated June 30, 1976 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Jaipur City where by he convicted and sentenced the accused-appellant as under: Aladeen: under Section 366 IPC 2 years' Rule I. and fine of Rs. 500/-, Under Section 376 IPC 3 years' Rule I. and fine of Rs. 1000/.The substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are that Miss Sushila came to Jaipur with her mother and stayed with her maternal uncle. On January 29, 1976 she went to answer the call of nature While returning back accused met her on the way and asked her to accompany him under the pretext that her father was ill. On his insistence the girl agreed to accompany him and sat on his bicycle He took her to his house and thereafter committed rape upon her against her wishes. On search by the relatives of the prosecutrix, she was recovered from th...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Prasad Joshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-02-1978
Reported in: AIR1978Raj131
ORDERM.L. Shrimal, J.1. The petitioner is a member of Rajasthan Administrative Service. He was appointed as Land Acquisition Officer, at Jaisalmer on April 25, 1974. He continued on that post upto April 16, 1976. During this period he re-opened a number of cases already decided by his predecessor in office and paid an amount of about Rs. 7,00,000/-to various land holders. An F. I. R. (Annexure 2) was lodged before the C. B. I. against Suresh Chandra, K. G. Karnal, K. I. Hansraj Soni and N. K. Tripathi under Sections 120, read with Section 420 I. P. C., 5 (2) read with Section 5(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and Sections 420, 468, 477A I. P. C. and 5 (2) read with Section 5 (1) (d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. In the course of investigation the petitioner was interrogated on February 19, 1977. After investigating the case for about a year the Investigating Agency placed the papers before Honourable the Chief Minister of Rajasthan for granting sanction for prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›