Rajasthan Court May 1976 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Shankariya
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-05-1976
Reported in: 1977CriLJ684; 1976(9)WLN258
P.D. Kudal, J.1. Accused-appellant Shankariya has been convicted and sentenced to death by the learned Sessions Judge, Ganganagar by his judgment dated June 27, 1975, The learned Sessions Judge has made this reference for confirmation of the sentence of death. Accused Shankariya has filed an appeal from jail against his conviction and sentence.2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that First information report Ex.P/7 was lodged on September 9, 1973 at about 7.30 a.m. by one Shyam Singh son of Balla Singh, It was alleged in the First Information Report that the informant went to the Gurdwara of village Takhat Hazari at about 7. a.m. for the purpose of grooming and burning incense. When he opened the doors of the Gurdwara and entered into it, he saw Mada singh lying on a cot, and was groaning with the pain. He saw three persons lying on three different cots. He went to the village and contacted Jagirsingh, Hari Singh, Sukhdarshansingh, Amar singh, etc. He returned to the Gurdwars, with...
Kanhiya Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-04-1976
Reported in: 1976CriLJ1652
V.P. Tyagi, Ag. C.J.1. This appeal by Kanhiya is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur City dated March 14, 1974 whereby the appellant was convicted for an offence under Section 302. I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life for having committed murder of Mst. Dhooli and her son Shyoji, a nine year old boy. He was also convicted for an offence under Section 379, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonmeni for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months. Both the substantive sentences were however ordered to run concurrently.2. The facts giving rise to this case are as follows:Mst. Dhooli was married to Kanhiya resident of village Jhopada. She had a son Shyoji from this wedlock. In the year 1972 just before 'Holi' Mst. Dhooli's brother Durgalal, came from Jadawata to fetch his sister Mst. Dhooli and took both Mst. Dhooli and Shyoji to his village Jadawata on a promis...
Tiwari Pradyumna Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-04-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN164
C.M. Lodha, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, she petitioner has prayed that the auction of the petitioner's house situate in ward No. 12, Rampura, Kota conducted by the Commercial Tax on Officer, Circle A', Kota respondent No. 2) (who will hereinafter be referred to as the 'CTO.') and knocked down in favour of respondents No. 3, 4 and 5 on 29th March, 1976 be quashed and possession of the property in question be restored to him. The petition has been opposed at admission stage by the CTO, who has filed his own affidavit in reply to the main allegations contained in the writ petition.2. I have heard Mr. M.M. Tiwari on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S.C., Bhandari on behalf of the CTO at some length. Mr. Bhandari has raised a preliminary objection to the entertain ability of the petition on the ground that the petitioner has admittedly filed objections under Section 247 of the Rajasthan Lard Revenue Act, 1956 (which will hereinafter be called 'the A...
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. R.R. Gupta, Commer ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-03-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN326
M.H. Beg, J.1. We have before us a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution and two appeals by Special leave from the judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan between the same parties. The three cases before us raise the same question of law. It is : Do the goods called 'Rayon Tyre Cord Fabric' sold by the Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. to manufacturers of tyres, who use it for the purpose of impregnating it with rubber, fall under entry 18 of the Schedule of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'?2. The Schedule mentioned above gives a list of goods on the sale or purchase of which no tax is payable under the Act. The relevant entry 18. which was omitted in 1973, reads as follows:18. All cotton fabrics, rayon or artificial silk fabrics, woollen fabrics, sugar and tobacco,as defined so the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (Central Act 58 of 1957).Section 2(c) of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Speci...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›