Rajasthan Court December 1976 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Fatma Begum Vs. Bhure Khan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-08-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)492
Rajindar Sachar, J.1. This is an appeal against the order of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner rejecting the claim filed by the appellant.2. Mst. Fatma Begum filed an application on 14-4-70 under Section 20 of the Workmen's Compensation Act (hereinafter to be called 'the Act') claiming Rs. 6000/- as compensation against the respondent. The allegation was that her husband Ijazuddin was in the employment of respondent where the latter was working on a mine worked by the respondent and he died as a result of accident during the course of employment on 5-4-70.3. The lower court has found that the deceased Ijazuddin was in the employment on the contractor Bhure Khan. It also found that on the date of the accident on 5-4-70 the mine work was being carried on by the respondent. It found that the deceased was getting Rs. 100/- per mensem as wages. However under issue No. 5 he held that the appellant had not been proved to have been legally married to the deceased Ijazuddin and was theref...
Budha Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-06-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)483
A.P. Sen, J.1. This is a petition by one Budha under Article 226 of the Constitution for issue of a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the Board of Revenue 24-10-1968 affirming the decision of the Revenue Appellate Authority and the Sub divisional Officer holding him to be a trespasser and directing his ejectment under Section 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. The material facts are these.2. Respondent No. 4 Bodan, who is the ex-Biswedar of village Jogwad, brought this suit under Section 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, for the ejectment of the petitioner alleging him to be a trespasser. It appears that be had cultivated the lands in question in partnership with the petitioner for Samvat years 2012, 2013 and 2014. The petitioner brought a revenue suit No. 9/1958 in the court of the Sub divisional Officer, Kishangarh, for a declaration of khatedari rights. That suit was dismissed by the Sub-divisional Officer by his order dated 31-3-1959 holding that be was not a tenan...
Ram Avtar and anr. Vs. Dhan Raj and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-03-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN750
K.D. Sharma, J.1. This is a revision petition filed by Ram Avtar and Om Prakash, hereinafter referred to as party No. 2 against a final order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jaipur, on 23-6-1975, in a proceeding under Section 145, old Criminal Procedure Code.2. The relevant facts, out of which this revision petition has arisen, are as follows : On 9-6-1970, Dhan Raj Duggar, hereinafter referred to as party No. 1, wrote a letter to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur, that for the last two years some persons, namely, Ram Avtar, Om Prakash and Nathu were disturbing his possession over a portion of land measuring 50 acres and situated at Jaipur Agra road near 4th mile stone from Jaipur. According to Dhan Raj, this land was allotted to him in the year 1946. He alleged to have filed a suit for permanent injunction in the court of the Sub Divisional Officer against the persons disturbing his possession and obtained an Injunction restraining them from causing in...
Smt. Premwati Soni JaIn and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1976
Reported in: AIR1977Raj116; 1976(9)WLN798
Sen, J. 1. These two appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, preferred by two sets of claimants, directed against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bharatpur, dated 27-1-1973, raise a common question and therefore are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The Claims Tribunal has allowed the claim of compensation of Keshav Deo and others to the extent of Rupees 30,000/- for the death of Kedarnath Gupta, and that of Smt. Premwati Soni Jain and others to the extent of Rs. 15,000/-, for the death of Horilal Jain against the respondent No. 3 Harpal Singh who is a driver employed in the office of the District Forest Officer, Bharatpur, on its finding that the accident resulting in their death, was caused due to his rash and negligent driving of a Government jeep. It has, however, disallowed their claim for compensation against the employer, i. e., the State of Rajasthan which owns the jeep, holding that the respondent No. 3 Harpal Singh, the driver h...
Sohan Lal Vs. Smt. Premlata and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1976
Reported in: 1976WLN(UC)529
A.P. Sen, J.1. Heard on question of admission, In the present case the learned District Judge has fixed Rs. 60/- as interim maintenance payable by the appellant who is the husband, to the respondent his wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The order is assailed on the ground that the learned District judge had no jurisdiction to award any maintenance to the children under Section 24 of the Act. In support of the contention, reliance is placed en Bankim Chandra Roy v. Smt. Anjali Roy : AIR1972Pat80 .2. There can be no doubt that under Section 24 of the Act, the Court cannot award any maintenance to the children as laid down in Bankimchandra Roy Roy Smt. Anjali Roy (supra). The section is clear and explicit and admits of no other construction.3. The learned District Judge has not awarded any interim maintenance to the children but what be has done is only to fix the amount of interim maintenance payable to the wife keeping in view that she has to maintain the children a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›