Rajasthan Court December 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ibrahim and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-10-1975
Reported in: 1975(8)WLN802
P.D. Kudal, J.1. This is an appeal by the three accused appellants, viz. Ibrahim Jamal and Ridmal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur District Jaipur dated 27-4-1971, where by the accused appellant's were convicted under Section 325 and 323 read wish Section 34 IPC, and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment, and a fine of Rs. 200/-, each, in default thereof to one month's rigorous imprisonment under Section 325 IPC and to enc year's simple imprisonment under Section 323 IPC. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. The facts of the case, in brief are that the residents of villages Pigun and Surri made an application Ex. P/23 to the S.D.M Sambhar that about 5000 cows and about 14000 or 15000 goats and sheep belonging to the famine stricken area have encamped in the village of Sali, Surri, Khanpura, Pigun, Mordi Kalan, Mordi Khurd and Morda. These cattle heads were not only grazing grass, but were also damaging the crops of wheat and the crop...
Azimulla Wazir Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-03-1975
Reported in: 1975WLN(UC)492
M.L. Jain, J.1. This is an application under Sub-section (2) of Section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The assesses firm was purchased for Rs. 32,000/-. It filed a return for the assessment, year 1963-64 showing a loss of Rs. 5,600/- after claiming depreciation of Rs. 8000/- on the original cost of the truck. The Income-tax Officer Ajmer determined the net income at Ra. 5,000/- on agreed basis.3. In respect of the assessment year 1964-65, the assessee filed a return again showing a lass of Rs. 1,200/- after claiming depreciation of Rs. 6,000/-. Here again the Income-tax Officer assessed the net income of the assessee at Rs. 5,000/ on agreed basis.4. In the assessment year 1965-66, the Income-tax Officer again assessed the firm at Rs. 5,000/- on agreed basis The truck was sold for Rs. 33,251/-in February, 1965. The assessment was completed on 23.9 66.5. Subsequently, it was discovered that the income of the assessee had escaped assessment and ...
Lalla and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-02-1975
Reported in: 1975WLN(UC)462
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated October 20, 1971 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dholpur whereby he convicted Lalla, Ramesh and Gopal under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC, and sentenced each of them to rigorous imprisonment for two years. The accused Ramesh was also convicted under Section 323 IPC for causing hurt to Balkishan and sentence to rigorous imprisonment for six months Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently The other accused Devi Charan and Gulab who were tried along with them were acquitted of all the charges.2. The prosecution story in a nutshell, is that PW3 Balkishan wanted to set up a hotel on the open space outside his house. Devicharan (acquitted) accused who had, already been running a hotal in the vicinity was annoyed by P.W. 3 Balkishen's intention to set up a hotel. There had been verbal altercation between the two. On the morning of the date of the occurrence P.W. 12 Hotilal, brother in-law (...
Tilak Raj Vs. Mst. Lalli Bai
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1975
Reported in: AIR1976Raj82; 1975()WLN656
ORDERKalyan Dutta, J.1. This is an application in revision against an order of the Additional District Judge No. 3, Jaipur City, dated 28-7-1975, confirming the order of the Munsiff, Jaipur City (East) dated 5-4-1974, by which the application of the petitioner for setting aside ex parte decree was rejected. 2. The short facts, which are necessary for the disposal of this revision-petition, may be stated as follows:--Mst. Lalli Bai instituted a suit against Tilak Raj, petitioner, for arrears of rent and ejectment. Summonses were issued to the defendant and were entrusted to Roop Narain, process-server, for service. It was reported by Roop Narain, process-server, on 31-7-1968, that the petitioner refused to accept the service of the summons and hence substituted service under Order V, Rule 17, Civil P. C. had to be effected by affixure of a copy of the summons along with a copy of the plaint on a conspicuous part of the house in which the petitioner ordinarily resided. Upon receipt of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›