Rajasthan Court April 1971 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lalaram Vs. Ramratan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1971
Reported in: 1971WLN326
B.P. Beri, J.1. On Lalaram's complaint Netram, Ramratan and Ramjilal were convicted under Section 323 I.P.C. and sentenced to 6 Months' rigorous imprisonment by the Additional Munsiff-Magistrate No. 1, Dholpur. The accused preferred an appeal in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Dholpur, in which the State and Lalaram were both impleaded as respondents. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted them by his judgment dated 4.10.1966. The complainant after obtaining special leavers from this Court has preferred' appeal against the judgment of acquittal.2. The only ground urged by the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the appellate court did not issue any notice to the complainant for the hearing of the appeal and decided it after hearing the learned Counsel for the accused-appellants and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. The question which merges for consideration is whether the learned Additional Sessions Judge was in error in not issuing a notice to the co...
Leela and ors. Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1971
Reported in: 1971WLN(UC)45
Kansingh, J.1. By his judgment dated 13.8.70 the learned Sessions Judge, Alwar convicted each of the five appellants for offences under Section 307 read with Section 149, 147 and 148 Indian Penal Code. For the first each of them was awarded four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default one month's rigorous imprisonment, Three of the appellants namely, Kamal Khan, Chaosingh and Rahim Khan were convicted under Section 147 Indian Penal Code and awarded six months rigorous imprisonment each. The remaining two namely, Leela and Ghutmal were convicted under Section 148 Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment each. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. Mangtu Ram (P.W. 1) was the sarpanch of Bhainsdavat and the appellants also rersided in that village. Appellant Ghutmal was fined by Mangtu Ram for hot removing rubbish dropped by him on the Panchayat land. A recurring penalty was also imposed at the rare of Re. 1/- per day. Kamal K...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›