Rajasthan Court January 1971 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Rajasthan Vs. Chandra Mohan Chopra
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-12-1971
Reported in: AIR1971Raj229; 1971(4)WLN1
Jain, J.1. In Civil Suit No. 2/ 1961 the plaintiff claimed a decree for Rs. 28,907.44 P. The learned District Judge, Kota passed a decree for Rupees 17,340.26 P. and dismissed the rest of the suit. It is against this decree that the defendant State has filed this appeal for the dismissal of the entire suit and the plaintiff-respondent has cross-objected and has claimed an additional decree for a sum of Rs. 6,835.29 P.2. For the construction of Kansuan Aqueduct situated in Tehsil Ladpura. District Kota, the tender dated 29-9-1954 of the plaintiff was accepted by the Executive Engineer by his letter dated 29-1-1955, An agreement No. 26 of 1954-55 to that effect was executed between the parties- In terms of the agreement, the work was to be completed by the plaintiff contractor upto 9-1-1956. According to the plaintiff, there were heavy monsoons in Rajasthan in the year 1955 and on account of that earth filled on 31/2 bays and behind the abutment and guide wall was washed off sometime in ...
State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Chander Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-11-1971
Reported in: AIR1971Raj299; 1971(4)WLN18
C.M. Lodha, J.1. The suit out of which this second appeal arises was instituted by Shri Chander Singh, an Advocate of Bhilwara for Rs. 2000/- on account of damages for wrongful termination of his appointment as a Public Prosecutor on 15-5-1956 before the completion of the term of three years commencing from 1-1-1954 to 31-12-1956 for which he had been appointed. His case is that the defendant No. 2 Shri Purshottam Lal Sukhwal. who was the Collector and District Magistrate, Bhilwara was displeased with him and was favourably disposed towards Shri Dalpat Singh. Advocate, also practising at Bhilwara and wanted to appoint Shri Dalpat Singh as Public Prosecutor in place of the plaintiff. It is alleged that Shri Sukhwal managed to get the plaintiff's appointment terminated by the Law Department, Government of Rajasthan and in pursuance of the orders issued by the latter, Shri Sukhwal directed the plaintiff to hand over the charge of his office as a Public Prosecutor to Shri Dalpat Singh with...
Mangal Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1971
Reported in: 1971WLN23
Kan Singh, J.1. Accused Mangal Singh and Sahab Singh were convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge No. 1, Dholpur of offences under Sections 326 and 326 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code respectively Each one of them was awarded a sentence of three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 250/-; in default six months' further rigorous imprisonment. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge further ordered that at amount of Rs. 250/- out of the fine, if realised, shall be paid to injured Gordhana. The accused lodged an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge Bharatpur which was transferred to the learned Additional Sessions Judge Dholpur who had dismissed it and maintained the conviction and the sentence awarded to the accused petitioners. They have come up to this Cour in revision.2. There was bad blood between P.W. 1 Gordhana and the two accused on account of a dispute about an agricultural land. Mangal Singh was the son aged about 14 years at the time and Sahab Singh was his...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›