Rajasthan Court July 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ratanlal Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-14-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN334
L.S. Mehta, J.1. This is a review application submitted on behalf of Ratan Lal under Secection 561-A, Cr. P.C., for re-hearing the case. The avermenta in the application are that S.B. Criminal Revision No. 347 of 1968, was called for hearing on 24-10-1969. That day Mr. U.M. Trivedi, Advocate for the petitioner, was not present, His junior Shri Krishna Murari Advocate asked for an adjournment of the case for Monday the 27th October, 1969, when Mr. Trivedi was to come to Jodhpur. Shri Krishna Murari further prayed that he was unable to argue the case as the relevant case file was with the senior Counsel. This court. however, refused to adjourn the case and acting on the facts narrated in the judgment of the court below presumed that the moveable property had not been seized from the petitioner. The petitioner prayed that in these circumstances the case may be reheard and proper direction be given. The above application was admitted by this Court on January 12, 1970, Keeping in view the p...
The State of Rajasthan Vs. the Associated Store Industries Kota Ltd. a ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-11-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN398
Jagat Narain, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Rajasthan (defendant No. 2) against a decree of the District Judge, Kota, dated 25-9-58 decreeing a suit instituted against it and against the Union of India (defendant No. 1) by the Associated Stone Industries Kota (hereinafter referred to as the Company).2. The relevant facts are that the Ruler of the erstwhile State of Kota entered into an agreement Ex. A on 2-5- 45 with the Company for quarrying Kachcha stone from the Tehsils of Ramganj Mandi and Chochat. Monopoly rights for quarrying Kachcha stone in these two tehsils were granted to the Company for a period of 15 years from 1-10- 44. The terms and conditions contained in Clause 18(1) of the agreement ran as under:In consideration of the concessions and privileges granted by the Grantor and in lieu of income-tax, super tax and excess profits tax, the Grantee convenant to pay to the Grantor royalty on the stone excavated at the rate of rupee one per 100 sq. ft., subjected to th...
Dr. S.M. Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and 17 ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-07-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN347
Kan Singh, J.1. In this writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution certain appointments of Professors and Readers in Surgery made by the Government ( vide their order dated 21-2-69 Annexure 13.) under the Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Special Selection Rules, 1967 are impugned.2. The petitioner Dr. S.M. Gupta had entered the service of the State of Rajasthan in 1955 as C.A.S. Class I. He was appointed as a Junior Specialist in 1962 and appointed to officiate as Lecturer in Surgery on 28-2-67. He came to be promoted to Officiating Reader in Surgery on 23-8-67. Five posts of Professors, 11 posts of Readers and 17 posts of Lecturers were advertised for being filled in accordance with the Rajasthan Medical Service Service (Collegiate (Branch) Special Selection Rules, 1967, hereinafter to be referred as the '1967 Rules'. He applied for the post of a Professor in accordance with the 1967 Rules. Like others he was called- for interview by the Special Recruitment Boar...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›