Rajasthan Court May 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Galbaji and ors. Vs. C.T.O. Sirohi and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-11-1970
Reported in: 1970(3)WLN451
ORDERV.P. Tyagi, J. 1. The petitioners in, these 15 writ petitions have challeneged the vires of Section 10 (3) of the Rajasthan Entertainments Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the Act') and it has been prayed that the said section may be struck down as being violative of Arts. 14 and 19(1)(f) of the Constitution.2. The facts giving rise to these writ petitions are, in a nutshell, as follows : The petitioners are the exhibitors of cinema films at different places in Rajasthan. They were duty bound to pay the Entertainment Tax to the Government by adopting any one of the three different modes of payment of the tax as given in the Act. On a surprise checking made by the Commercial Taxation Officer and the Commercial Taxes Officer Survey and Investigation, it was discovered that the petitioners were evading tax by admitting persons to the exhibition of their films without making any payment thereof to the department under the Act. In all these cases proceedings were therefore taken unde...
Mangla Ram Vs. Paras Ram and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-11-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN491
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This second appeal by the defendant arises out of a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts.2. The plaintiff-respondent No.1 Paras Ram alleged in the plaint that a parthership was formed between him and the defendants-Bhoor Chand and others in the month of Baisahk, Samwat 2013 for plying a motor bus RJQ 164 on Balotra-Sanchore route. It was prayed that a decree for dissolution of pantnershsp and rendition of accounts be granted.3. A preliminary decree for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts was passed under Order xx, Rule 15, Civil P.C. on 18.7.1962, where by the proportionate shares of the parties were declared and the partnership was held to have been dissolved on 31.5.1960. It was also mentioned in the judgment that Shri Jagdish Prased Gupta be appointed as Commissioner, on tentative payment of Rs.50/--as his fee for going into the accounts of the partnership. He was directed to submit his report within a month of that the fina...
Likhmi Chand and ors. Vs. Smt. Sukhdevi and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-08-1970
Reported in: AIR1970Raj285; 1970(3)WLN225
Jagat Narayan, C.J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs whose suit for grant of some reliefs in respect of a 'Nohra' and a 'Haveli' situated at Bidasar was dismissed by the Senior Civil Judge, Churn.2. The findings of fact arrived at by the trial Court are not disputed before us. The only question for determination before us is a pure question of law. The facts necessary for the decision of the question are these: One Askaran had a son Bhikamchand who died in his life-time leaving a widow Smt. Sukhdevi. Bhikamchand left a daughter Kan Kanwari who was not implead-ed as a party to this suit. Askaran was separate from his brother Dhanraj but Askaran and Bhikamchand constituted a joint Hindu family. On the death of Bhikamchand his coparcenary interest in the joint family property went to Askaran by survivorship. Smt. Sukhdevi had only a right of residence and maintenance in the joint family properties.3. On 7-2-1928 Askaran executed a will in favour of his nephew Johrimal bequeathing all...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›