Rajasthan Court April 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sugan Chand Vs. the Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1970
Reported in: AIR1971Raj186; 1970(3)WLN511
Chhangani, J. 1. This is an appeal by Suganchand against the order of a learned Single Judge dated 28-8-1969 dismissing the appellant's writ petition andmaintaining the order of the Transport Appellate Tribunal dated 3-5-1969 by which it cancelled the permit granted to the appellant and remanded the case for deciding the application afresh along with other applications.2. The material facts are these--The respondent No. 3 Mst. Pritam Kaur was once one of the existing bus operators on Bayana-Bhusavar via Weir route. The permit granted to her was not renewed as she had no bus of the requisite model and thus there was one vacancy for the issue of a permit. The Regional Transport Authority received applications for the grant of permit for this vacancy. The names of the applicants and the dates of the publications of their applications are given below:--S.No.Name ofapplicantDate ofpub.1.Subhash Chand Mittal s/o RamDayal Bhusavar31-3-682.Smt. Pritam Kaur Devi w/o Late Sh. RameshSwamiBhusavar...
State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Mohan Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1970
Reported in: AIR1971Raj318
C.M. Lodha, J.1. The only point for decision in this second appeal is whether the amount which is being recovered from the plaintiff-respondent was an immoral debt due from his father Harak Chand, and, therefore, the same cannot be recovered from the respondent.2. It appears that the plaintiff-respondent's father Harakchand sold some opium during the period S. 1972 to Section 1980 without maintaining proper accounts and consequently in accordance with the Circular No. 1368 of S. 1973, issued by the former State of Mewar he was held liable to pay a sum of Rs. 5,456/15/-, by the Mahendrai Sabha by its iudgment dated 24-12-1933 as 'Chori Mehsul'. A fine of Rs. 500/- was also imposed upon him by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara by his order dated 17-2-1933, and the same was upheld by the Mahendraj Sabha by the same order dated 2442-1933. An amount of Rs. 5,456/6/- remained due from Harakchand at the time of his death, and this was sought to be recovered from the property in the hands of the pl...
Municipal Board Vs. Gafoor
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN476
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff Municipal Board, Jodhpur whose suit has been dismissed by both the lower courts of the ground that it is barred by time.2. The respondent has not appeared in this Court inspite of service of notice upon him, and, therefore, the appeal has been heard ex-prate,3. Briefly put the facts of the case are that the plaintiff--Board had given a contract to the respondent Gafoor for removing dead animals within the Municipal limits of Jodhpur for one year from 1.10.1951 to 30.9.52 for a sum of Rs. 12,175/-which was to be paid in two equal instalments by the end of period of the contract. The plaintiff's case is that the first instalment was paid but the defendant failed to pay the second instalment and conscquently it took steps to recover the amount of the second instalment through the Tehsil, Jodhpur, It is alleged that on 15.9.1952 the defendent made an application to the Board for depositing R. 400/- in part payment of the instalment ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›