Rajasthan Court January 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pritam Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-12-1970
Reported in: AIR1971Raj184; 1971CriLJ974; 1970(3)WLN38
Mehta, J. 1. On August 25, 1967, at about 8 P. M. accused Pritam Singh, Dalip Singh, Ranki and Chandra Sahai. armed with pistols and knives, entered the house of the complainant Tekchand, situate in Ganganagar, to commit robbery. Tekchand and his wife Mst. Manbhari were available in the house. The accused Pritam Singh caught hold of Tekchand and took him to the stare-room. He gave blows to Tekchand with a 'Lathi' and threatened him with dire consequences unless he parted with his valuables. Accused Ranki forcibly took off ornaments of Mst. Manbhari. On her raising an alarm, she was beaten. She however, managed to run away towards the gate. The accused Chandra Sahai tried to catch her. She somehow escaped from her residence. On hearing her cries Puran and others assembled on the spot. After sometime the accused took to their heels with the booty stolen by them. Tekchand lodged first information report with the Police Kotwali, Ganganagar, soon after the occurrence. In the course of inves...
Girwardhan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-08-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN187
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This is an appeal by an unsuccessful plaintiff whose suit for declaration that he was entitled to be interviewed for permanent appointment to the Rajasthan Administrative Service has been dismissed by both the lower courts.2. The plaintiff's case was that he was a Naib Nazim in the year 1940 in the erstwhile State of Alwar and was working as a Magistrate First Class in April 1948 when the erstwhile State of Alwar was merged in the United State of Matsva which was again merged in the United State of Rajasthan in the month of May 1949. It was alleged that the Government of Rajasthan published the rules and instructions for selection of Government servants and fixation of seniority by notification dated 8.8.1950 published in the Rajasthan Rajpatra dated 12- 8- 1950, and since the plaintiff was eligible for appointment to the Rajasthan Administrative Service he made an application through proper channel The plaintiff's grievance is that the Committee constituted under the ...
Nyaya Panchayat Nagar District, Bharatpur Vs. Munsiff Magistrate, Deeg ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1970
Reported in: 1970(3)WLN1
ORDERKan Singh, J.1. The writ petition before me, which has been lodged by the Nyaya Panchayat Nagar, raises a question whether the Nyaya Panchayat could, in a criminal case triable by it, take a bond from the accused for his appearance before it and on his non-appearance subsequent to the execution of the bond forfeit the bond.2. A criminal case under Sections 323, 304 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code was instituted before the petitioner Nyaya Panchayat by one Dayachand against one Durgalal and others. One Nathulal who was an accused executed a bond for his appearance and the respondent Girraj Prasad stood as surety for his appearance and he executed the surety bond. As Nathulal was absent on the date of hearing, the Nyaya Panchayat called upon both Nathulal and Girraj Prasad to show cause why the amount of the bond be not recovered from them. Both these persons admitted their mistake and the Nyaya Panchayat forfeited the entire amount of the bond and issued notice for its recovery. N...
The Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Laxmilal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1970
Reported in: 1970WLN33
C.M. Lodha, J.1. This is a second appeal by the defendants Union of India and the General Manager, Western Railway from the judgment and decree by the Additional District Judge, Udaipur dated 4-10-1968 whereby the learned Additional District Judge upheld the judgment and decree of the trial court dated 4-6-1965.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated as below. The plaintiff-respondent Laxmilal was appointed as a clerk Grade I in the Ex-Mewar State Railway in the pay scale 60-130 and was confirmed on 3-4-1950. After integration of the erstwhile Mewar State Railway the plaintiff was transferred from the office of Assistant Traffic Superintendent Udaipur to the Railway Training School at Udaipur on 1-6-1953 and was promoted to officiate as Clerk Grade II with effect from 22-2-1954. He was confirmed in Grade II with effect from 1-4-1956. On 6-8-1957 he was promoted to officiate as Sub-Head Clerk in the Railway Training School at Udaipur as Clerk Grade III but was reverted to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›