Rajasthan Court March 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharma Ram Vs. Ram Karan and the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-10-1969
Reported in: AIR1970Raj129; 1970CriLJ984; 1969()WLN105
ORDERB.P. Beri, J.1. This is a criminal revision application directed against the order of the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, dated the 27th November, 1968, whereby he ordered the transfer of a case from the Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Bilara, to the Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Jodhpur District 2. The criminal case, out of which the present revision-application arises, has had a chequered career. The case was initiated at the instance of the police on the 18th November, 1965, before the Munsiff-Magistrate, Bilara. The allegations were that the accused Dharma caught hold of the breasts of Mst. Gomati in a field where this woman was working at about noon on the 15th September, 1965. The learned Munsiff-Magistrate Bilara convicted the accussed under Section 354, I. P. C. but gave him the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act by merely admonishing him The husband of Mst. Gomati preferred an appeal in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur. After treating...
Firm Jai Dev JaIn and Co. Vs. Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributin ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-07-1969
Reported in: 1969WLN122
Jagat Narain, J.1. This is a revision application by the defendants against an appllate order of the District Judge, Ganganagar.2. The defendants are the lessees of a plot of land at Ganganagar which was sub-let by them to the plaintiff for a period of 15 years. Possession over the plot was given back by the plaintiff to the defendant under a licence under which the defendants were appointed as dealers of the plaintiff for the sale of petroleum and other products. On the plot of land a petrol pump has been installed and a show-room has been constructed. It is not denied that the cost of these constructions comes to more than Rs. 20,000/-. The defendants have resigned from the dealership and the plaintiff has instituted the present suit for possession over the land. One of the questions raised before the appellate court on behalf of the defendants was that the price of the building standing on the land should be included in arriving at the valuation of the land for the purpose of court-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›