Rajasthan Court January 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Sharan Vs. the Revenue Appellate Authority
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-10-1969
Reported in: 1969WLN9
Kansingh, J.1. This is a writ petition by one Jagdish Sharan and he seeks a writ direction or order quashing the order of the Additional Collector dated 8.10 63 (Ex. P/3) as well as the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority dated 13.2.64 dismissing the revision application of the petitioner against the Additional Collector. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction to restrain the Municipal Board, Kotputli from giving effect to the order of the Additional Collector or that of the Revenue Appellate Authority. The relevant facts of the case are these:2. The petitioner is the resident of Kotputli and he has a house there. In front of the house there was a strip of land, which the petitioner claimed to be his own. On this land the petitioner wanted to raise certain construction. His case is that he applied for permission to make the construction to the Municipal Board, Kotputli. He proceeds to say that after hearing the objections that were made against the petitioner's application...
Gujarmal Vs. Sukhpal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-09-1969
Reported in: 1969WLN37
D.M. Bhandari, C.J.1. This revision application arises under the following circumstances:2. The plaintiff Gujarmal instituted the suit for the recovery of Rs. 217 on the basis of a Khata against the defendant opposite party Sukhpal before the Nyaya Panchayat Sakar on 11th November, 1962. Briefly the case of the plaintiff was that op 4tb November, 1959 the defendant executed a Khata for Rs. 264/- and made payments of Rs. 50/- and Rs. 60/- on 27th April, 1960 and 26th August, 1960 respectively. It is not expressly stated that the defendant had signed the payment entries, but it appears from the Khata filed by the plaintiff before the said Nyaya Panchayat that the payment of 26th August, 1960 was thumb marked by the defendant and in view of the fact that rules of pleadings are not strictly followed in the Nyaya Panchayat, it may be taken that the payments were signed by the defendant. The Panchayat considered it to be a fit case to be tried by the regular court under Section 55 of the Raj...
Namamal and ors. Vs. Radhey Shyam
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1969
Reported in: AIR1970Raj26; 1969()WLN1
C.M. Lodha, J. 1. This appeal has been brought by certificate granted under Section 18 (2) of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance from the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 18th March, 1966 in S. B. Civil Misc. Application No. 61 of 1965 (in S. B. Civil Regular Second Appeal No. 452 of 1960), 2. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated within a short compass. 3. The plaintiff-respondent Radhey-shyam (landlord) filed a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment from a shop situated in Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur, against the defendants-appellants Namamal and others (tenants) on two grounds viz., that the defendants have not paid rent of the premises for more than twelve months and that the premises are required reasonably and bona fide by the landlord for his own occupation. The landlord's plea for personal necessity was rejected by the trial Court. However the suit for arrears of rent and ejectment was decreed on the ground that the defendant-tenants had committed defa...
Krishanlal Godara and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-07-1969
Reported in: 1969WLN17
ORDERNo. F. 1(83) Appts (A)61 Jaipur the 8th August, 62.Where as an enquiry under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 is being held against the following personnel:(1) Shri Jhabarmal Maharia,Formerly Dy. Superintendent of Police (City) Ajmer.(2) Shri K.L. Godara,Formerly Dy. Superintendent of Police, Headquarters.(3) Shri K.K. Singh,Formerly Dy. Superintendent of Police, Beawar.And whereas the Governor considers that an Enquiry Officer should be appointed to enquire into the charges framed against them:Now therefore, the Governor under Rule 18 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 hereby appoints Sbri Balwant Singh, Commissioner for Departmental Enquiries, Raj. Jaipur as Enquiry Officer to conduct a joint enquiry into the charges framed against the aforesaid personnel. The procedure prescribed in Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 shall b...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›