Rajasthan Court July 1968 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narayan Swarup and ors. Vs. Shankar Lal and Sons. (Private) Ltd. and o ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-15-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Raj302
ORDERC.M. Lodha, J.1. The petitioners before me are the plaintiffs. Their application for issuing temporary injunction was dismissed by the trial Court and so also the appeal filed before the District Judge.2. Non-petitioner No. 1 M/s. Shankar Lal and Sons (Private) Ltd. filed a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment on 8-2-1960 against Bishan Swarup, father of the present petitioners. This suit was registered as Civil Suit No. 180 of 1960. Bishan Swarup died during the pendency of the suit and the petitioners as well as non-petitioners No. 2 to 5, who are the widow, sons and daughters of Bishan Swarup, were impleaded in his place as his legal representatives. Non-petitioner No. 2, who is the widow of Bishan Swarup, was made guardian of the minor sons and daughters of Bishan Swarup. On 21-3-1961 a compromise petition signed by Shri S. S. Deedwania, counsel for non-petitioner No. 1 M/s. Shankar Lal and Sons plaintiffs, and Shri J. N. Mehra, counsel for the defendants, in that suit, was ...
Jhanwarlal Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Raj29; 1969CriLJ306
ORDERL.S. Mehta, J.1. This is a reference submitted by Shri Roshanlal Sharma, Sessions Judge, Bikaner, recommending that the order of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikaner, (City), dated October, 11, 19.66, allowing maintenance allowance of Rs. 60, to Smt. Bhanwari, may be set aside.2. The facts of this case are short and simple. Smt. Bhanwari is admittedly the legally married wife of Jhanwarlal. After the marriage Smt. Bhanwari lived with her husband amicably for some time. It is alleged that some time later Jhanwarlal's father Chhaganlal desired to satisfy his sexual lust with Smt. Bhanwari and for that purpose he made an, indecent assault on her. Smt. Bhanwari brought this fact to the notice of both her husband and her mother-in-law, but instead of their coming to her rescue, she was beaten by them and turned out of the house. Consequently she withdrew from the residence of Jhanwarlal and started residing with her father. Later on, she made an application in the court of learned Sub-Di...
Urban Improvement Trust Vs. Raj Kumari and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Raj131
ORDERC.B. Bhargava, J.1. These three revision petitions are being dealt with together as the petitioner is common to them and they also raise common questions of law and fact.2. In the Court of the Munsif, Alwar, the plaintiffs-non-petitioners filed separate suits or ejectment against the defendants-non-petitioners who were described as tenants of one Shivlal deceased from whom they claimed to have purchased the suit property. The defendants in their written statements denied that they held the property as tenants of Shivlal. They stated that they were in possession of the suit property since the time of their ancestors and were permanent tenants of the land and had constructed houses on it at their own costs. They further pleaded that Shivlal had no right to transfer the suit property to the plaintiffs in each case as he was the 'Muafidar' or 'Jagirdar' whose Jagir had resumed by the State of Rajasthan under the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act of 1952 (hereinafter ...
Dhanpat Lal Vs. Harisingh and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-05-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Raj92
1. This is a special appeal under Section 18 of the High Court Ordinance 1949 against the judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 22nd July, 1966 passed in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 882 of 1965. 2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated as follows:-- 3. The election for the office of Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Nanagal Rajawatan, District Jaipur, took place on 1-1-1965. Initially three persons filed their nomination papers but the nomination paper of one Badri was rejected with the result that Dhanpat Lal appellant and Harisingh respondent remained in the field. Dhanpatlal secured 395 votes whereas Harisingh secured 397 votes and 55 votes were declared to be invalid. Consequently Harisingh was declared duly elected by the Returning Officer. Thereafter Dhanpatlal and Chhajuram filed separate election petitions in the Court of Munsiff-Magistrate, Dausa under Rule 78 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyaya Panchayat Election Rules, 1960 (hereinafter called 'the Rules') challeng...
The Amalgamated Electricity Co. Ltd., Ajmer Vs. the Municipal Council, ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-02-1968
Reported in: AIR1968Raj327
Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer. dated 5th November 1966 and involves the determination of a question relating to award of interest while directing restitution under Section 144, Civil Procedure Code2. The facts giving rise to this appeal-may be stated within a narrow compass.3. The appellant. Amalgamated Elec-tricity Company Limited, obtained a money decree from the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer for Rs. 44,461/11/9 against the respondent. the Municipal Council Ajmer on 19-9-1956. The appellant was also awarded costs of original suit Rs. 1997 and pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 3 1/2% P. A. The appellant thereafter levied execution hut the respondent filed an appeal before this court and obtained ex parte stay of execution on 15-2-1967. Later on, after hearing both the parties the ex parts stay order dated 15-2-1967 was set aside by a subsequent order dated 19-3-1967 of this Court and it was directed that t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›