Rajasthan Court May 1966 Judgments
Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka Vs. R. Prasad and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj61
ORDER1. We have before us two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution by Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka, a businessman of Bombay, who had his ancestral home at Ramgarh in the State of Rajasthan. By writ petition No. 270 of 1966, he questions the validity of an order dated 4-3-1966 passed by Income-tax Officer (Central) Section X, Bombay, under Section 132(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and prays for a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction. By writ petition No. 269 of 1966, he challenges the legality of a notice issued to him on 3-2-66 by the Deputy Collector of Land Customs and Central Excise. Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby the petitioner was called upon to show cause why the gold recovered from the petitioner's premises and seized by the Excise authorities be not confiscated under Rule 126-M of the Defence of India Rules. In this behalf he prays for a writ of prohibition restraining the respondents from taking any further proceedings against him an...
Tag this Judgment!Khan Mohamed and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-06-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj37
Tyagi, J.1. This is plaintiffs' appeal against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Udaipur dated 8th of January, 1958, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit as being time barred.2. The facts of this case are not much in dispute. It is admitted between the parties that the forest of Thikana Madri in District Udaipur was leased out by the Forest Department to the plaintiffs for the manufacture of 600 Handis of 'Katha' (Catochu) at the rate of Rs. 15 per Handi. One of the conditions of the agreement which was signed between the parties on 27th November, 1947 was that the plaintiffs would complete the Theka work by the 30th of June, 1948 and if for certain unforeseen calamity the plaintiffs failed to complete their work, then it will be within the discretion of the department to renew the contract for the next term on the payment of 10 per cent over and above the amount stipulated in the contract. But for this purpose, it was necessary for the plaintiff to make an application by F...
Tag this Judgment!Radhakishan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-04-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj1
D.S. Dave, C.J.1. The petitioners Radhakishan and Badrinarain, in this case, are Khandelwal Mahajans and residents of Jaipur. They are partners in a firm which is known as Shivjiram Ramkumar. They have filed this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It relates to a two-storeyed building situated near Mirza Ismail Road at Jaipur.2. The petitioners' case is that the said building belonged to one Ashan Ali Khan who mortgaged it with possession with Seth Bijaylalji, father of petitioner Badrinarain, and Bhuramalji, father of petitioner Radhakishan, for Rs. 7,999 and executed a mortgage-deed on 30-7-1944. At the time of the mortgage, the building was in physical possession of Ashan Ali Khan's tenants. When the mortgage-deed was presented for registration, the Sub-Registrar invited objections, but since no objection was received, that document was registered by him. Ashan Ali Khan had purchased an open land in front of the said building from the Municipal Council ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›