Rajasthan Court February 1966 Judgments
Kriparam Ganeshilal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-28-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj90
ORDER1. The petitioners in the 39 writ petitions before us are grain dealers carrying on business at various places in Rajasthan and they seek writ, order, or directions in the nature of mandamus against the State of Rajasthan and other respondents for ordering them to permit the petitioners to export from out of Rajasthan quantities of foodgrains equivalent to that supplied by them to the various Collectors in accordance with the provisions of Clause (3) (a) of the Rajasthan Gram and Barley (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1964, (hereinafter for the sake of convenience to be referred to as the 'Gram--Barley Order. 1964'). As the writ petitions raised identical questions they can conveniently be disposed of together.2. In a nutshell the case set up by the petitioners is that when they sold to the Collectors the quantity of grain equivalent to what they proposed to export out of Rajasthan and for which they obtained necessary certificates from the Collectors under the Gram-Barley Ord...
Tag this Judgment!Shantilal Shiv Kumar and ors. Vs. Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-23-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj138
Kan Singh, J. 1. We have three matters before us. The first two are writ petitions filed by Messrs. Shantilal Shivkumar and Messrs. Patel Ramanlal Chunnilal respectively by which the validity of a resolution of the Regional Transport Authority, Kotah, dated 4th January, 1964 and the order of the Transport Appellate Tribunal Jaipur dated 20th November, 1964 by which the said resolution was upheld in appeal, has been challenged. These writ petitioners seek writ, order or direction against the Transport Authorities, i.e. respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 5 to forbid them from interfering with the running of their stage carriages upto river Chawli, which, according to them, is covered by their permits granted by the Regional Transport Authority for Jhulawar-Pirawa route They also question the validity of the conditions imposed by the transport Appellate Tribunal while extending the area of their route by ordering that the writ petitioners shall ply their stage carriages both on the portion of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Automobile Transport Rajputana Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Transport App ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-21-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj114
1. The six special appeals before us are directed against the judgments of a learned single Judge of this Court dated 15th and 18th November, 1965 respectively by which the learned Judge issued identical directions restraining certain operators, who had obtained permits from the Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur on Jaipur-Malpura-Kekri-Beawar route from plying their buses between Jaipur and Sanganer and further issued consequential directions to the Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur to amend the permits of these operators so that their routes terminate at Sanganer instead of at Jaipur. The appeals can conveniently be disposed of together. The history of the matter may briefly be recounted for a proper appreciation of the points canvassed before us.2. Then contest has arisen between certain existing operators on the route in question and those, who wanted to avail of this route, as a sequel to nationalisation of certain routes in Rajasthan. When the State of Rajasthan embarked on ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›