Rajasthan Court August 1965 Judgments
State Vs. Dhanpat and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-25-1965
Reported in: 1967CriLJ1450
L.N. Chhangani, J.1. This is an appeal by the State from the order of First Class Magistrate, Bhadra dated 14-8-1963, acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 325 and 323, Penal Code.2. The facts leading to this appeal may be briefly stated as follows:The respondent Richhpal and injured Hari Singh P. W. 3 were students of the village School in village Ramgarh. The accused, respondent Dhanpat is the father of the accused-respondent Bichpal. On 30-4-1962 Hari Singh P. W 3 and the accused-respondent Richhpal were going to School at about 9 A.M. Haridngh drew a picture of a man on his slate Eichhpal questioned Hirisingh as to whose picture he bad prepared. Hari Singh replied that he had prepared the picture of a person. Richhpal thereupon told him that it was the picture of his dead father, Richhpal having said so at once began to run away. Hari-singh tried to chase him. Richhpal collided with one boy Prithvi Raj in consequence of which he lost one of his teeth. This incident ...
Tag this Judgment!Nand Lal Vs. Shri Prithvi Singh and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-09-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ868
ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J.1. The question requiring determination in this reference is whether Shri Prithvisingh, Superintending Engineer, Rajasthan Electricity Board in the year 1962 and now Additional Chief Engineer and Shri S.B. Chaurasiya, Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan State Electricity Board, officers of the Government of Rajasthan and functioning on deputation with the Rajasthan State Electricity Board, are public officers within the meaning of Section 56, Sub-section (2) of the Indian Electricity Act of 1910, and as such, cannot be prosecuted for an offence under the Electricity Act without the sanction of the Rajasthan State2. The facts leading to the reference may be stated at the outset:-It is common ground that on 12.1.1962 Shri Prithvisingh and Shri S.B. Chaurasiya (hereinafter referred to as the accused) acting on behalf of the Rajasthan State Electricity Board discontinued the supply of electricity to the complainant Shri Nandlal. The aeeused-non-petitioner entertained suspi...
Tag this Judgment!Onkar and anr. Vs. Kapoorchand and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ579
ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J. 1. This is a reference by the Additional Sessions Judge, Tonk, recommending that conviction and sentence of the accused applicant Onkar and Bajrang under Section 426, Indian Penal Code, may be set aside and the case may be remanded to the trial court for fresh trial in accordance with law. 2. The facts leading to the reference may be briefly stated as follows:-- On 21st April, 1962 Kapoorchand-opposite party No. 1 presented a complaint in the court of First Class Magistrate, Tonk, against the petitioners Onkar and Bajranga accusing them for an offence under Section 427, Indian Penal Code. The allegations in the complaint are that the opposite party is the manager of a 'dharmshala' constructed by his father Seth Chhaganlal and that there was a lime kiln in the dharmshala. On 17th April, 1962 the accused petitioners destroyed the kiln and caused a damage to the extent of Rs. 200 On 1st May, 1962 the Magistrate recorded the statement of the complainant and further ...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Chandra Vs. Laxminarayan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-04-1965
Reported in: 1966CriLJ1482
ORDERV.P. Tyagi, J. 1. This is a revision application filed by Kailash Chandra against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ajmer, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and upholding the order of the Additional Munsiff Magistrate First Class, Kekri who had directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 100 as compensation to non-petitioners Nos. 1 to 3 under Section 250 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2. It appears that there was a complaint filed by Kailash Chandra against the first three non-petitioners in the court of the Additional Munsiff-Magistrate First Class, Kekri under Section 352/504 Indian Penal Code in which the non-petitioners were acquitted by the learned Magistrate vide his judgment dated 25th February, 1964 While dismissing the complaint, the learned Magistrate recorded a finding that the petitioner had filed a false and frivolous complaint against the non-petitioners Nos. 1 to 3 and, therefore, he ordered to issue a notice under Section 250 Criminal Procedure Code calling...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›