Rajasthan Court March 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anwar Mohammad Vs. Managing Officer, Cum Custodian of Evacuee Property ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-07-1964
Reported in: AIR1964Raj260
Tyagi, J. 1. This is a writ application by one Anwar Mohammadunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 are not present before the Court. Shri Vishanlal, Advocate for respondent No. 6 stated before us that his file was taken away by his client and, therefore, he was not representing hint now. No reply was filed either on behalf of the respondents Nos. 5 and 6 and, therefore, we have heard the writ application against them ex parte.3. A joint reply has been filed on behalf of respondents Nos. 1 to 4.4. It is common ground between the petitioner and the contesting respondents that a plot of land bearing No. 367, situated in Mohalla Kagziyan, Sanganer, District Jaipur, was declared an evacuee property under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, since it belonged to one Ramjani son, of Illabux of Sanganer, who had gone away to Pakistan. This property was acquired by the Government of India under the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensati...
Radha Kishan Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-05-1964
Reported in: AIR1964Raj216; 1964CriLJ459
ORDERL.N. Chhangani, J. 1. This is a reference by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sikar, recommending that the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate', Sikar, dated 29-12-1961 stopping proceedings in criminal original case No. 618 of 1961, and the subsequent order dated 2-7-1963 in criminal original case No. 121 of 1962 overruling the accussed-petitioner's plea that the subsequent complaint was barred, be set aside.2. The material facts giving rise to the reference may bet stated as follows:On 28th of February, 1961, the Food Inspector Sikar purchased some sample of ghee from the respondent Radha Kishan of Khatu, and sent the same to the Public Analyst at Jaipur. The, Public Analyst found that the sample of ghee was adulterated with foreign fat and did not conform to the prescribed standard of purity. A complaint under Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, was filed against the accused before the Magistrate on 24-10-1961. The Magistrate issifsd summons to enforce t...
State Vs. Ram Pratap
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-03-1964
Reported in: 1966CriLJ496
D.M. Bhandari, J.1. This case has come before under the following circumstances.One Ram Pratap accused was tried for offences under -section 302 and 507, Penal Code and acquitted by the Sessions Judge of Ganganagar by his judgment dated 23rd of August 1961. The State preferred an appeal to this Court against the order of acquittal. The State appeal was admitted by this Court on the 23rd of January 1962. While admitting the appeal it was ordered that a warrant of arrest be issued against Ram Pratap who will be produced before the District Magistrate, Ganganagar and it will be for him to admit the accused on bail or send him to jail. The District Magistrate reported to this Court that the accused was arrested and was released on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs. 25,000/- and a surety bond by Nathuram in the like amount. The State appeal was heard and decided by this Court on 29th of March 1963.Ram Pratap was convicted under section 302 and 307, Penal Code and was sentenced to imp...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›