Rajasthan Court December 1962 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satish Kumar Vs. Election Tribunal (District Judge), Alwar and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-03-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Raj157
Dave, J.1. This is a writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and it arises in the following circumstances: -2. The petitioner' Satish Kumar and respondent No. 2 Badri Prasad and a few others contested the general election held on the 26th February, 1962 from the Bansur Constituency for memership of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly. The petitioner was declared elected as he received the highest number of votes. Respondent No. 2 lost the election. Respondent No. 2 then filed an election petition to challenge the election of the petitioner before the Election Commission. The said petition was sent for disposal to the Election Tribunal, Alwar, presided over by Shri Syed Ikramul Haq, R. H. J. S. The petitioner in his written statement raised several objections which led the Tribunal to frame more than 58 issues. Out of them 16 issues (Nos. 1, 7, 10, 14, 15, 22 to 25, 31, 36, 40, 54, 55, 57 and 58) were considered by the Tribunal to be preliminary issues an...
The State of Rajasthan Vs. Amolak Chand Sanghi
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-01-1962
Reported in: 1982WLN633
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. By this appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, the State of Rajasthan (appellant) questions the correctness of the order dated December 11, 1974 of the learned single Judge of this Court by which he allowed the petitioner-respondent's petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and quashed the order Ex. 5 dated September 17, 1965 by which the penalty of stoppage of two grade increments with cumulative effect was imposed upon the petitioner-respondent.2. Shri Amolak Chand Sanghi who is respondent in this appeal and was petitioner in the writ petition will hereinafter be referred as the petitioner. While the petitioner was posted as an Assistant Engineer, Irrigation, Jaipur, he was served with the following charge:That the said Shri Amolak Chand Sanghi, while functioning as Assistant Engineer, Irrigation at Baran and Kalisote Project during the period from 1954 to 1959 abused his official position by authorising, making and claiming u...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›