Rajasthan Court November 1959 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramlal and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-07-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Raj168; 1960CriLJ995
ORDERJagat Narayan, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Balotra recommending that the proceedings under section 211 I. P. C. pending against Ram Lal and Bhanwar Lal applicants in the court of the First Class Magistrate Banner be quashed.2. On 18-1-56 Bhanwar Lal lodged a report at Banner Police Station alleging that Joshi Tara Chand had committed theft by removing fuller's earth belonging to the firm Ram Lal and sons of which Bhanwar Lal was the Munim. On 6-8-56 he filed a criminal complaint under Section 379 I. P. C. against Joshi Tara Ohand in the court of the First Class Magistrate Banner on the same allegations. As a result of investigation the Station House Officer Banner Police Station found that the report lodged by Bhanwar Lal On 18-1-56 was false and filed a criminal complaint in the court of the First Class Magistrate Banner on 7-8-56 under section 211 I. P. C. against Bhanwar Lal as well as Ram Lal.The petitioners raised an objection before the First Class Magi...
Rameshwar Lal, Ram Karan and ors. Vs. Gulab Chand Puranmal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-03-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Raj243
K.L. Bapna, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of the learned Civil Judge, Balotra, dated 28-7-1955 directing return of the plaint.2. The plaintiffs Ramkaran, Bhanwarlal, Ram-eshwar Lal, Ramrakh and Jasraj instituted a suit in the court of Civil Judge, Balotra, on 12-3-1951, against Gulab Chand, a resident of Kanpur, on the following allegations: The plaintiffs Nos. 1 to 4 carried on business at Karachi in the ' name and style of Ramkaran Bhanwarlal. Owing to disturbances following the partition of the former Dominion of India the plaintiffs being Hindus had to close their shop at Karachi, which became part of Pakistan, and came to Balotra as displaced persons, and had been living there as such,It was alleged that the defendant had a shop at Kanpur under the name and style of Nanagram Chauthmal. It was alleged that the plaintiff's firm at Karachi had certain dealings with the Kanpur firm, as a result whereof the plaintiffs were entitled to recover Rs. 5,147/6/6 inclusive of intere...
Chauthilal Vs. Badri Prasad and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-03-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Raj249
K.L. Bapna, J.1. This is a first appeal in execution proceedings.2. The respondent firm Badri Prasad Kishori Lal instituted a suit against Chauthi Lal and his son Ramcharan as owners of the firm Chauthi Lal Par-shadilal. The suit was for the recovery of Rs. 7,690/- principal and Rs. 86/8/- as interest, making the total claim at Rs. 7776/8/-. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff informed the Court that he had received Rs. 600/- from the defendants.The trial Court gave a decree for Rs. 7.178/8/-with full costs and interest to run at 3 per cent p. a, during the pendency of the suit and till satisfaction. According to the decree the amount decreed and the costs came to Rs. 8,075/7/9. The decree-holders filed an application for execution of the decree on 25-2-1947, and wanted execution against Chauthi Lal for Rs. 8,433/1/3 as follows:Amount according to decreeRs. 8,07579Cost of copies526Present expenses116153Interest during suit23579Total ....8,43313In column No. 4 it was mentione...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›