Rajasthan Court November 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mst. Chandanbai Vs. Jagjiwanlal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-08-1957
Reported in: AIR1958Raj110
I.N. Modi, J.1. This is a second appeal by the defendant Mst. Chandanbai against the judgment of the Civil Judge, Udaipur, dated 10-12-1951, in a suit for redemption.2. The plaintiff respondent Jagjiwanlal as a minor and brought this suit through his next friend Mst. Kankubai, his mother in his capacity as the legal representative of his ancestor Jawanji who is alleged to have made the mortgage of the suit shop-cum-house, situate in village Dhulev and the boundaries whereof are mentioned in para (1) of the plaint, in favour of Sankad Chand an ancestor of the defendant appellant by a mortgage deed dated Kati Vadi 11 Smt 1920 for Rs. 861/-. The mortgage was with possession.It was further alleged in the plaint that the mortgagee had spent a sum of Rs. 111/5/- by way of improvements to the suit property in Smt. 1930 and this was acknowledged on behalf of the plaintiff's ancestors on the deed itself, and later in Smt. 1952 a further sum of Rs. 39/- was spent on repairs thereof, and the same...
Jaswantsingh Vs. Assistant Judge, Mahsana and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-05-1957
Reported in: AIR1958Raj124
K.N. Wanchoo, C.J. 1. These are two connected writs by the Divisional Personnel Officer of the Western Railway at Aimer under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of certiorari in connection with a matter under the Payment of Wages Act. The applications were originally filed in the High Court of Bombay and have come to this Court under Section 64(2) of the States Reorganization Act, 1956.2. It is not necessary for present purposes to set out in detail the case of the parties. Suffice it to say that an application was made by Bal Krishna Maheshwari, Opposite Party No. 3, who was in the service of the Western Railway at Abu Road, on 7-7-1952 under the Payment of Wages Act before the Authority having jurisdiction in the matter viz. the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Abu Road, Balkrishna Maheshwari claimed that his wages had been illegally deducted and prayed for relief under section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act.The matter was enquired into by the Authority concerned and an ...
Mahaveerchand and anr. Vs. Shri Bhanwarlal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-04-1957
Reported in: AIR1958Raj77
Modi, J.1. This is a complaint by the petitioners Mahaveerchand and Shantichand of Jodhpur through their Aam-mukhtar Rajmal for professional misconduct against Shri Bhanwarlal, an advocate practising at Barmer.2. The allegations on which the complaint is founded may be briefly stated as follows. It is alleged that the petitioners (who were decree-holders) had initiated proceedings under Ss. 78 and 79 of the Marwar Tenancy Act against Thakur Himmatsingh of Jasol (judgment-debtor) with respect to the income of certain villages as the tenants were recalcitrant and had declined to pay the Hasil.Consequently, Shri S.N. Modi, standing counsel of the petitioners, along with Rajmal, and Surajrnal another Aam-mukhtar of the petitioners, went to Barmer to engage counsel to conduct the proceedings on behalf of the petitioners and briefed the respondent Shri Bhanwarlal. It was alleged that Shri Sultan-mal pleader was also engaged to assist Shri Bhanwarlal.One Rughnathmal was in due course appointe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›