Rajasthan Court May 1956 Judgments
Krishna Mills Ltd. Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-21-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1379
ORDERSharma, J.C.1. These are two connected references by the learned Sessions Judge, Shri G. D. Badgel.2. The Krishna Mills Ltd., Beawer is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, Shri Man Man Bakliwal is the Manager of the said Mills. Sharva Shri Goverdhan Das Kabra and Achaldas were two of the directors. They were due to retire by rotation, but were re-elected at the annual general meeting of the company held on 22-9-1954. Their names were not notified to the Registrar under Section 87(2), Indian Companies Act.3. The case for the prosecution in brief was that by reason of not notifying the change in the directors, the provisions of Section 87(2), Indian Companies Act were contravened.4. The applicants pleaded not guilty. Their contention was that there was no change in the directors as the same two directors were re-elected.5. The learned Magistrate held that there was a change and was necessary to notify it under Section 87(2), Indian Companies Act.6. The learned Ses...
Tag this Judgment!Mangilal and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-1956
Reported in: 1957CriLJ158
ORDERI.N. Modi, J.1. This is a revision by the petitioners Mangilal and Girdharlal against an order of the Sessions Judge, Balotra, dated 17th August, 1955, rejecting their application dated the 14th February, 3955, praying for their acquittal, and arises under the following circumstances,2. The petitioner Mangilal is a Sub Inspector of Police and the other petitioner Kirdharlal is a head constable of police and both were posted at the police station Balotra at the relevant time. The case of the prosecution is that a report was filed by Purushottam and Kalu, residents of Ramdari, in the police station Balotra that a, theft had been committed in the house of Purshottam and that the complainant Punamchand filing with certain other persons were responsible for that theft.Thereupon the petitioner Mangilal sent for Punamchand, his mother, sister and sister's husband on the morning of the 7th April, 1950, and Insisted upon their appearance at the thana every day from the 8th April, 1950, to ...
Tag this Judgment!Gopal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-10-1956
Reported in: AIR1957Raj17
Dave, J.1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Bhilwara dated 12-5-1952 reversing the decree of the Munsiff Bhilwara dated 25-8-1951.2. It involves an interesting question of law viz. whether the Union of India is responsible to pay damages in torts to a public servant in its employ on account of some mistake or wrong, if any, committed by another officer in its employment.3. Before dealing with the question, it would be proper to narrate the facts giving rise to the present action. The plaintiff was Station Master and was posted at the Station Lambia in the year 1948.On 6-4-1951 he filed the present suit for declaration and for award of Rs. 500/- as damages. His case was that on 13-5-1948, he was continuously on duty for the last 56 hours since he got no relief from Bhilwara in spite of repeated intimation and so, he fell ill on account of the strain of work He found it impossible to work single handed any more and, therefore...
Tag this Judgment!Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-08-1956
Reported in: AIR1956Raj188
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an application by Chandra under Article 223 of the Constitution against the State of Rajasthan and others relating to the election to the Panchayat at Gangwa, which has been called Village Panchayat Manglana in the petition, and appears as non-petitioner 4.2. The facts, which have been alleged by the applicant, are that a Panchayat was established at Gangwa. This Panchayat included three other villages, namely, Deolikhurad, Manglana and Dilandhana, and was known as Gangwa Panchayat according to the notification issued when it was established. Elections for this Panchayat were scheduled to be held on 10-4-1955, at village Gangwa, and,six Panches were to be elected from six wards into which the four villages were divided.The applicant was a candidate in ward No. 1 of village Gangwa. Votes were taken in ward No. 1, and the applicant secured 176 votes as against 101 by the rival candidate Pusa Balai. The applicant was then declared elected. Elections with respect to...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›