Rajasthan Court March 1954 Judgments
Mohd. Ahmed Vs. Panna Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-31-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Raj222
Sharma, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the judgment-debtor against the appellate order of the Civil Judge, Baran, holding that the decree-holder's application for execution was not time barred.2. The facts are that the decree-holder obtained a decree against the judgment-debtor Abdul Lateef Khan on 20-3-1937 and the decretal amount was to be paid in yearly instalments of Rs, 507-each. On failure of any one of the instalments the whole amount was to become due and the decree-holder was entitled to execute the decree for the whole amount. The decree-holder filed an application for execution on 29-1-1940 and while the proceedings for execution were pending, a compromise was made between the parties on 24-6-1941 and it was stipulated that the balance of decretal amount was to be paid in yearly instalments of Rs. 75/-. Some instalments were paid, but the balance of Rs. 178/14/- remained unpaid for which the decree-holder put in the present application on- 1-5-1950. The judgment-debtor ...
Tag this Judgment!State and anr. Vs. Beejal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-22-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Raj283
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is a second appeal by the State against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Pali, by which that Court reversed the decree of the Civil Judge, Pali, and decreed the suit brought by Beejal, plaintiff-respondent, against the defendant-appellant.2. The case put forward in the plaint by Beejal was that he entered the boundary of the former State of Marwar in August, 1950, from the former State of Sirohi along with certain sheep, goats, lambs and camels in order to go to Ajmer. When he reached Pali, he was stopped from proceeding further unless he paid two taxes known as Kharota lag and Charnot duty. He was compelled to pay Rs. 764/- as Kharota lag and Rs. 833/- as Charnot duty. He, therefore, filed this suit for recovery of the sum of Rs. 1597/-.His case was that these taxes were realized from him without any authority of law, and against the provisions of the Rajasthan (Regulation of Customs Duties) Ordinance (No. 16) of 1949 (hereinafter called the Rajastha...
Tag this Judgment!Sobhagmal Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-02-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Raj207
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an application by Sobhag Mal for issue of a writ of mandamus quashing the order of the Commissioner, Customs and Excise, Rajasthan, dated 29-7-1952, and of the Government, dated 17-1-1953, and directing them to proceed according to law in connection with the proceedings resulting in the dismissal of the applicant.2. The case of the applicant is that he was appointed by the Government of the former state of Jaipur, on 16-10-1946, on probation for one year. Thereafter, he was appointed on 4-3-1948, as Inspector, Customs and Excise Department, as his work during the probationary period was found satisfactory. He was suspended from service by the Assistant Commissioner, Customs & Excise, Jaipur, and gave over charge on the 11th June, 1949. No reasons were given for such suspension in the letter of the Assistant Commissioner.Eventually, however, on 31-8-1951, the Divisional Assistant Commissioner, Customs and Excise, gave the applicant a charge-sheet containing thre...
Tag this Judgment!Jaisingh Vs. Tahsildar, Neem-ka-thana and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-02-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Raj200
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an application by Thakur Jaisingh for the issue of a writ of prohibition, or any appropriate direction, order or writ of that nature under Article 226 of the Constitution, prohibiting the State of Rajasthan, opposite party, from recovering the alleged fine of Rs. 10,000/- from the applicant as arrears of land revenue.2. The case of the applicant is that he is the jagirdar of Thikana Garh-Taknet and Kalyanpura, and that a fine of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed upon him by the Ruler of the former State of Jaipur on account of illegal distillation of liquor by the applicant. Out of this sum, Rs. 3,000/- were recovered from the applicant in January, 1950.The applicant objected to the recovery of this amount or any further amount from him with respect to the alleged fine of Rs. 10,000/-, but the Government ordered the assumption of the management of the Thikana by the Court of Wards in order to realize the balance of Rs. 7,000/-. Thereupon, the applicant filed a writ peti...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›