Rajasthan Court August 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arjandas Tulsidas Vs. G.K. Bhagat
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-28-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ559
ORDERNigam, J.C.1. G.K. Bhagat, Returning Officer, Ajmer I (south-west) Constituency preferred a complaint under Section 182, I. P. C. against Arjandas Tulsidas. The complaint was presented in the court of the District Magistrate, Ajmer, on 12-3-1953 and the same day it was transferred to the Additional District Magistrate for disposal. The case came up for hearing on 25-3-1953. The accused appeared on that day and the charge was explained to him. He pleaded not guilty. On that day the complainant G. K. Bhagat was not present. The case was next taken up on 9-4-1953 on which day, the complainant and one other witness were examined. On 25-4-1953, the next day fixed in the case, the complainant was again absent. On that day the Assistant Public Prosecutor presented two applications. In one of these it was requested that certain additional witnesses may be summoned. In the other it was requested that the facts alleged constituted an offence under Section 193, I. P. C., and therefore, the c...
Madan Mohan Vs. Bankatlal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-26-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Raj145
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. This is an application under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution by Madan Mohan praying for the issue of a writ of certioran or other appropriate writ or order in connection with the decision of an election petition against the applicant by the Election Tribunal at Bikaner. 2. The facts, which have led to this application, are these: 3. General elections were held in Rajasthan in January 1952 for the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly. The applicant way a candidate in that election from the Parbatsar (assembly) constituency, and was declared elected after contest. On 9-6-1952, Bankatlal, opposite party, presented an election petition to the Election Commissioner against the election of the applicant. This petition was assigned by the Election Commission to the Tribunal at Bikaner, which consisted of Shri M.P. Asthana as Chairman, and Shri M.C. Bhandari and Shri Goverdhandas T. Gajria as members. Shri Badri Prasad, Kunwar Dalipsingh, Thakur Karansingh and Thakur Shiv Sing...
Chhagansingh Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-26-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Raj153
ORDERModi, J. 1. This is an appeal by the accused Chhagan Singh who has been convicted of offences under Section 307, Penal Code, and Section 19, Arms Act. He has been sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months under Section 307, I. P. C., and to 18 months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 19, Arms Act. 2. The case for the prosecution is briefly as follows: On 27-2-52, Malusingh, Head Constable attached to the police station Ratannagar, came to knew that the dacoits Mohania, Dhannesingh and Chhagansingh were in the village Raipuria and were expected to stay there during the night. It is said That these persons were wanted by the police in connection with several crimes. Malusingh went on the same night to the Superintendent of Police, Churu, Shri Tarachand (P. W. 1) who immediately on being informed organised a raid party to go to Raipuria. The police party led by the Superintendent ...
Askaran RamdIn Rathi Vs. Pushkar Co-operative Sale and Supply Union Lt ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-13-1953
Reported in: AIR1959Raj272
B.N. Nigam, J.C.1. Askaran filed Civil Suit No. 824 of 1947 against Pushkar Co-operative Sale and 'Supply Union Ltd., through its Secretary seeking a decree setting aside the award, dated 28-4-1947 passed by the arbitrator against the plaintiff. The suit was contested and the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the suit with costs. Against thatjudgment and decree, Askaran has come up inappeal.The facts, in brief, are that the plaintiff was the Manager and Treasurer of the defendant society, but was not a member thereof nor a shareholder. In connection with certain transactions in respect of wheat-flour certain losses were incurred by the defendant society, which approached the Registrar who, by his order dated 12-9-1946, referred the matter to arbitration. The plaintiff questioned the procedure followed during the arbitration proceedings and also urged that arbitration proceedings were illegal and ultra vires and the arbitrator had no jurisdiction to pass the award. In the appeal, I ha...
State Vs. Kishorilal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ564
ORDERNigam, J.C.1. On 25-10-1949 the Special Police Establishment presented a charge-sheet against Kishorilal, Kalyanmal, Radha Vallabh and Chajulal under Section 7 of Act 24 of 1946. This charge-sheet was presented in the Court of the Stipendiary Magistrate, Shri O. K. Bhagat. Evidence for the prosecution was recorded. Then on 6-2-1950 it was urged that as the territory of Pant Piploda had merged with Madhya Bharat, the Court had ceased to have jurisdiction in the case. The learned Magistrate thereupon submitted the file to the District Magistrate, Ajmer for being transmitted to the Chief Secretary, Madhya Bharat for further action. Further proceedings were taken in the Court of the Magistrate at Alote.2. The prosecution were not satisfied that the Alote Court had jurisdiction in the matter and a motion was made before the High Court of Madhya Bharat. The Hon'ble the Chief Justice passed an administrative order on 16-8-1950 directing that the file be sent back for trial at Ajmer. As t...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›