Rajasthan Court April 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madan Singh and ors. Vs. Collector Sikar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-16-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Raj104
Sharma, J.1. These are 105 petitions filed by various state grantees and cultivators of the territories included in the former Jaipur State, which have now been included in the Districts of Jaipur, Jhunjhunu, Sawai Madhopur, Sikar and Tonk of the present State of Rajasthan. In the year 1947 the then Jaipur State passed an Act known as the Jaipur District Boards Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act). This Act came into force on ' 3-10-1947.2. Section 3 of the Act provided as follows:'(3) (i) There shall be one Board of everyDistrict or any area which the Government mayby notification in the Jaipur Gazette, declare.The jurisdiction of the Board shall not extendto Town Municipalities.'(ii) Every Board shall be a body corporate by the name of 'the (name of district) district board' and shall have perpetual succession and a common seal and shall be vested with the capacity of suing and being sued in its corporate name, of acquiring, holding and transferring property, moveable...
Purohit SwarupnaraIn Vs. Gopinath and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-15-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Raj137
Wanchoo, C.J. 1. The following point has been referred to this Bench for decision;'Whether where it is open to a party to raise a ground of appeal under Section 105, Civil P. C. from the final decree or order with respect to any order which has been passed during the pendency of the case, it should be held that an appeal from that order lies to the High Court in the meaning of the term 'in which no appeal lies thereto' appearing in Section 115, Civil P. C.'2. The facts, which have led to this reference, may be very briefly set out. There was ft suit in the Court of the Additional Civil Judge, Jaipur City, in which the defendant, who is the applicant in revision, raised the plea that the custom of pre-emption being contrary to the provisions of Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India, should not be given effect to by the Courts. The Additional Civil Judge heard arguments and decided the issue against the defendant and ordered the suit to proceed. Thereupon, the defendant came in r...
The State Vs. Takhat Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-04-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1567
Nigam, J.C.1. In Criminal Case No. 129 of 1951 in the Court of the City Magistrate, First Class, Ajmer, (empowered under Section 30, Criminal P.C.) Thakur Takhat Singh of Shergarh was found guilty under Section 324, Penal Code and was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 500/. with one month's-simple imprisonment in default. Against his conviction and sentence, he preferred an appeal (Cri. App. No. 37 of 1952) in the Court of the Sessions Judge, Ajmer. The learned Sessions Judge found that the prosecution story was proved but held that the appellant was entitled to a right of private defence of property and' had not exceeded that right. In the event, the learned Sessions Judge allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and fine. Against that order of acquittal, the State of Ajmer has filed this appeal. It is prayed that the order of conviction be set aside and the accused be convicted and sentenced. In the appeal I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned Counsel for the acc...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›