Rajasthan Court May 1952 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandanmal Vs. Phool Chand
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Raj181
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an appeal by Chandanmal against the decree of the District Judge of Nagaur in a pre-emption matter.2. The appellant and others had brought a suit for pre-emption against Mangilal and other defendants respondents with respect to a house, and wanted to pre-empt it on payment of Rs. 900/- though the sale deed was for Rs. 1,700/-.3. The suit was contested by the defendants who claimed that Rs. 1,700/- were actually paid. The defendants also claimed Rs. 5,200/- for improvements made in the house by them after the purchase.4. The District Judge decreed the suit and ordered that the defendants shall deliver possession of the house in dispute to the plaintiffs on deposit of Rs. 6,900/-. He further ordered that this sum shall be deposited in court within three months from the date of his judgment, which was 28th of February, 1949. There was deficiency of court-fee also, and the District Judge ordered that the deficiency in court-fee would also be made good within the sam...
Surajmal Vs. the Rajasthan State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Raj78
Wanchoo, C.J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Surajmal', owner of firm Badichand Bachhraj of gratapgarh praying for a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate direction against the Rajasthan State as the case may require.2. The application in this case was made on the 6th of September, 1951. The applicant is the licensee of the Power House at Pratapgarh. He increased the rates of supply of electricity for domestic and industrial consumers from the 1st of May 1951. The Government of Rajasthan however did not approve of this increase in rates and tried to persuade the applicant to continue charging the old rates till such time as the Government appointed a rating committee. The applicant, however, refused to agree to this on the ground that this would ruin his financial condition. Thereupon, on the 29th of August, 1951, the State of Rajasthan served an order which is said to have been passed under Section 33 of the Rajasthan Public Security Or...
Bahadur Singh and anr. Vs. Jaswant Raj Mehta and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Raj158
Sharma, J.1. This is an appllication by Bahadur Singh, Proprietor, Golden Goods Transport Co., Naya Bazar, Delhi, and Chandan Singh Driver, care of Golden Goods Transport Company, Delhi, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, against Shri Jaswant Raj Mehta, Commissioner, Customs ami Excise to the Government of Ralasthan, Shri Shyam Sunder Narain, Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) Customs and Excise, Rajasthan, Ltd., Col. Thakur Ranjit Singh, Deputy Commissioner Customs and Excise, Jaipur Division and the Government of the United State of Rajasthan through its Chief Secretary, for a writ of 'certiorari' to quash the judgment of the Deputy Commissioner, Customs and Excise, Jaipur Division, and for prohibiting the respondents from realising the fines imposed on the petitioners, and from confiscating their truck No. 391 or for any other direction or order necessary under the circumstances of the case.2. The case of the petitioners is that the Deputy Commissioner, Customs and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›