Rajasthan Court January 1952 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mt. Manphul Bai Vs. Ladhuram
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-02-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Raj115
Ranawat, J.1. This is the plaintiff's second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Sawai Jaipur Gangapur, dated the 7th September 1949, by which the decree of the first Court was set aside and the suit of the plaintiff was dismissed with costs.2. Manphul Bai. widow of Lalchand, filed a suit against Ladhuram and Gulab Bai in the Court of the Civil Judge, Jaipur City, on the 15th of November 1943 for ejectment and for rent in respect of a shop for three years amounting to Rs. 1800/-. The rent was claimed from 28th October 1940 to 27th October 1943 at. the rate of Rs. 600/- per annum on the basis of a rent note executed by Ladhuram on the 27th of August 1938, which is Ex. 21 on the record. The shop in respect of which rent and ejectment are claimed by the plaintiff is situated in Johri Bazar, Jaipur City, and is admittedly said to have been the property of one Chhogalal, who died in the month of Chait in Sambat year 1957 leaving behind him his widow Mohar Bai and an adopted s...
Chiman Mal Vs. Ganesh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-02-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Raj187
Bapna, J.1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money. The appellant sued the respondent on the allegations that the respondent entered into an agreement with two persons Jawanmal Hansraj, and Motilal Punamchand on 7th June, 1946 to deliver 1,25,000 bricks at the rate of Rs. 14/4/-per thousand by -- March 1947, and in default to pay Rs. 6/4/- per thousand bricks not delivered by way of damages. The bricks were not delivered and one of the two promisees, namely, Jawanmal Hansraj assigned his rights under the contract to the appellant Chiman Mal on 22nd June, 1947. This Chimanmal appellant brought the present suit on 25th June, 1947 for recovery of Rs. 220/- which had been paid by way of earnest money by Jawanmal Hansraj together with Rs. 390/15/6 as damages for nondelivery of half the quantity of bricks at Rs. 6/4/- per thousand, and the cost of notice. The defendant resisted the suit on various grounds including one that the suit being based on the assign...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›