Rajasthan Jodhpur Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manohar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 1/42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & Others. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5988/2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT :30. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Anil Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr.Jagdish Vyas, for the National Insurance Company. BY THE COURT:1. Whether it was resignation. from service or retirement. voluntarily taken by the petitioner from his employer, National Insurance Company, is the question involved in the present case.2. The petitioner Manohar Singh, was appointed as a Development Inspector on 09 August 1979 and since then he continuously served the respondent Insurance Company till 2006 for 27 years. On 18 January 2006, due to some unavoidable family SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 2/42 circumstances, the petitioner informed the Deputy General Manager of th...
Hema and ors Vs. Nanu and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.845/2011 Hema & ORS.versus Nanu & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 29th April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Deelip Kawadia, for the appellants. Ms.R.R.Kanwar, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 30.07.2011 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Bhilwara, whereby, the appeal filed by the appellants-plaintiffs has been dismissed affirming the judgment and decree dated 10.08.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division).Gangapur. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellants- plaintiffs filed a suit for mandatory and permanent injunction and for compensation of Rs.20,000/- against the defendants, inter alia, with the averments that at village Pitha Ka Khera the plaintiffs have land comprising in Araji Nos.467 and 468; for ingress and egress a old way is situated from the land of def...
Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
1 , ! : 188/1996 ! !* 389 401 . !/ ,1973, * ! 16/03/1996, , 6 /6 ( ). ! ! : 03/95 < = !.1, !.120/85 ?. * ! 03/11/93 ?. < A < !: 29.04.2014 D * :- - .. * D : F 6 /6 ( ). G * ! 16/03/96 < /H 2 F G D ! 03/95 ! ?. F = ! -1, * ! 03/11/93 F G D ! 120/85 ?. - 279 304 !/ ?. :- 279 !/ ?. / 100/- * , * 10 304 !/ ?. 6 / 100/- * , * 10 / ?. D ?. , / < ! 27/05/96 / / < - D / / P P / /H ! 04/07/1985 D /!/ . R -6 1 , 6 * < < :- 3 /H D . No.686 < P 6 H H/ / /D / W 6D /H / < D 9.30 Am / / / / / D 10.15 Am / / W ?. W...
Dr. Seema Ojha Vs. State Th. Sec. and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
SBCWP No.11418/13- Dr.Seema Ojha versus State Order dt: 29/4/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Dr. Seema Ojha versus State of Raj. & ORS.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.11418/2013 DATE OF ORDER : 29th April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Ms.Varsha Bissa, for the petitioner. Mr.Digvijay Singh, for the respondent. Both the learned counsels submit that the controveRs.in hand is covered by a decision of coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dr. Narendra Singh Rathore versus State & anr. - SBCWP No.5960/13 decided on 22/5/2013, which is quoted below for ready reference:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Ms.Varsha Bissa, for the petitioner. Mr.Sudhir Tak, for the respondents. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr.Sudhir Tak accepts notice for respondents. Counsel for petitioner submits that the controveRs.is no more res-integra in the light of the judgment of this Court dt.13th May, 2004 passed in D.B.S.A.W.No.1289/1997 and submits that ...
Smt. Krishna Devi Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
SBCWP No.3247/14 Dinesh Kumar vs. State & ors. Alongwith other 19 connected matters. Judgment dt:29. 4/2014 1/12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Dinesh Kumar vs. State of Raj. & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3247/2014 along with 19 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF ORDER :29. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. H.S.Sidhu, for the petitioners. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Ojha, for the respondent State. The petitioner, who is working as Lecturer in History in the respondent No.3 Gyan Jyoti P.G.College, Srikaranpur District Sriganganagar, has filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs:- (i) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to work on the post till the regular selected candidates are not being made available after 30.04.2014. (ii) that the respondents may kindly be directed to absorb the petitioner on the post of Lecturer in History, or in altern...
Rajkumar Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
SBCWP No.3247/14 Dinesh Kumar vs. State & ors. Alongwith other 19 connected matters. Judgment dt:29. 4/2014 1/12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Dinesh Kumar vs. State of Raj. & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3247/2014 along with 19 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF ORDER :29. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. H.S.Sidhu, for the petitioners. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Ojha, for the respondent State. The petitioner, who is working as Lecturer in History in the respondent No.3 Gyan Jyoti P.G.College, Srikaranpur District Sriganganagar, has filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs:- (i) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to work on the post till the regular selected candidates are not being made available after 30.04.2014. (ii) that the respondents may kindly be directed to absorb the petitioner on the post of Lecturer in History, or in altern...
Priyanka Goyal Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
SBCWP No.3247/14 Dinesh Kumar vs. State & ors. Alongwith other 19 connected matters. Judgment dt:29. 4/2014 1/12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Dinesh Kumar vs. State of Raj. & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3247/2014 along with 19 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF ORDER :29. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. H.S.Sidhu, for the petitioners. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Ojha, for the respondent State. The petitioner, who is working as Lecturer in History in the respondent No.3 Gyan Jyoti P.G.College, Srikaranpur District Sriganganagar, has filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs:- (i) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to work on the post till the regular selected candidates are not being made available after 30.04.2014. (ii) that the respondents may kindly be directed to absorb the petitioner on the post of Lecturer in History, or in altern...
Baljeet Singh Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
SBCWP No.3247/14 Dinesh Kumar vs. State & ors. Alongwith other 19 connected matters. Judgment dt:29. 4/2014 1/12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Dinesh Kumar vs. State of Raj. & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3247/2014 along with 19 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF ORDER :29. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. H.S.Sidhu, for the petitioners. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Dinesh Ojha, for the respondent State. The petitioner, who is working as Lecturer in History in the respondent No.3 Gyan Jyoti P.G.College, Srikaranpur District Sriganganagar, has filed the present writ petition for the following reliefs:- (i) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to work on the post till the regular selected candidates are not being made available after 30.04.2014. (ii) that the respondents may kindly be directed to absorb the petitioner on the post of Lecturer in History, or in altern...
Smt.Manju Sharma Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3768/2000 Smt. Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/04/2014 1/5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3768/2000 Smt. Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::29. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. P.S. Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Patel, Addl. Govt. Counsel. -- BY THE COURT:1. The petitioner was initially appointed on contractual basis as Teacher on 09.09.1984 and upon termination of her services, she approached this Court by filing writ petition being SBCWP No.1178/1991- Smt. Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors, which was decided by the learned Single Judge of this Court S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3768/2000 Smt. Manju Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/04/2014 2/5 on 14.12.1999 directing the respondents to regularise her services since she had completed the training provided by the State Gov...
Kishan Bihari Vyas Vs. Jai NaraIn Vyas University
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.927/2000 Kishan Bihari Vyas versus Jai Narain Vyas University & Anr. Order dated 29/04/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.927/2000 Kishan Bihari Vyas versus Jai Narain Vyas University & Anr. Date of Order :::: 29th April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.Mukesh Rajpurhit, for the petitioner. Mr.P.R.Singh, for the respondent- University. -- BY THE COURT: 1. This writ petition has been filed on behalf of employees of the respondent, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur ('University', for short) praying therein that for the period of strike, of which the employees of the respondent University observed strike, should not be treated as 'extraordinary leave without pay' in pursuance of the State Government order dated 21.02.2000 and the consequential order issued by the respondent- University on 13.03.2000. 2. The respondent, University has filed reply to the writ petition ...