Rajasthan Jodhpur Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guru Bux Singh Vs. Khem Singh
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.226/1999 LRs of Late Shri Guru Bux Singh versus Khem Singh Date of Judgment :: 28th February,2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.K.Thanvi Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi, for the appellants. Mr.M.C.Bhoot Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Arpit Bhoot, for the respondent. ---- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against appellate judgment and decree dated 24.02.1999 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Jodhpur, whereby, the judgment and decree dated 13.12.1996 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.1, Jodhpur has been modified. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : a suit for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent was filed on 03.02.1981 by Maji Leel Kanwar Deodi through her power of attorney holder Hanuman Singh against Guru Bux Singh for eviction from shop No.10 and a room adjacent to i...
Ashwani Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.816/2014 Ashwani Gupta Versus The Union of India & ORS.Date of Order : 26.02.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.Hemant Jain for the petitioner Mr.Sanjeet Purohit for the respondents BY THE COURT : An Indian passport bearing No.JP1077289746813 was issued in favour of the petitioner as per the provisions of the Passport Act. The passport aforesaid was to remain in currency upto 30.05.2017. The marking sheets of the passport exhausted within a period of two years due to higher number of foreign travels by the petitioner. An application, thus, was preferred to the competent authority on 03.10.2013 to issue an additional set of passport. The application came to be dismissed on the count that the Passport Officer received an adveRs.report from the Rajasthan Police. The petitioner then joined the issue under a communication dated [2].31.10.2013 with a clarification that he claimed for i...
Sankala Ram and ors Vs. State (Public Health and Engin.) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
1 D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7690/2011 Sankala Ram and ORS.V/s State of Rajasthan and ORS.26.2.2014 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vijay Bishnoi Mr.Manoj Bohra for the petitioneRs.Dr.P.S.Bhati, Addl.Advocate General for the respondents. Heard Mr.Manoj Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Dr.P.S.Bhati, learned Additional Advocate General for the State-respondents. The petitioners as residents of District Jalore had approached this Court with the grievance that the private respondents no.6 and 7 had been indulging in plumbing work extending from village Bharudi to Munthala Ka Bas for the purpose of drawing underground water for their private use. According to them, the land used for the purpose has been reserved for gochar, river and public way. They referred to a No Objection Certificate. from the Gram Panchayat, Bharudi, Panchayat Samiti Jaswantpura District Jalore to them facilitating installation of pipe lines. They emphatically averred that the...
Laxmi Lal Maheshwari Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
SBCWP No.495/98 Laxmi Lal Maheshwari vs. State & ors. Judgment dt:26. 2/2014 1/33 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Laxmi Lal Maheshwari vs. State & ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.495/98 *** DATE OF JUDGMENT :26. h February, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. Manoj Bhandari, ]. for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Maheshwari, ]. Mr. M.R.Singhvi, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Bhavit Sharma, for the respondents.1. The present old writ petition of 1998 filed by Laxmi Lal Maheshwari, who has expired during the long waiting period in the dockets of the Court on 8/4/2013, without being able to see the success of his case.2. This petition was filed against his compulsory retirement order dated 9/5/1984, which was upheld by the Appellate Authority also on 1.7.1997 and aggrieved of both these orders, he had filed the present writ petition, spread into 110 pages with documents annexed with writ petition, the bulky record swelled to 345 pages...
M/S Nakoda Granite and Marmo Pvt.Ltd Vs. Yogendra Singhvi
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER SB Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No.77/2009 M/s Nakoda Granite & Marmo Pvt. Ltd. v. Yogendra Singhvi Date of Order ::26. h February, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. R.K.Thanvi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Narendra Thanvi, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr. Vikas Balia and Mr. Vikram Choudhary, for the respondent. .... REPORTABLE This application as per provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1996') is preferred for appointment of arbitrators in consonance to clause 31 of the lease deed dated 5.4.2000 executed between Nakoda Granite & Marmo Pvt. Ltd. and respondent Shri Yogendra Singhvi, Director, Rajputana Granite & Marmo Pvt. Ltd. As per conditions of the lease deed, property of the applicant company was on lease with the respondent for a period of five years w.e.f. 5.4.2000 against payment of lease money @ Rs.1,91,000/- per mon...
Dalbeer Singh Vs. Abhijeet Ghosh and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.178/2010 Dalbeer Singh Versus Shri Abhijeet Ghosh & ORS.Date of Order : 26.02.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.K.S.Yadav for the petitioner Mr.Sanjay Raj Paliwal for the respondents BY THE COURT : This contempt petition is preferred alleging non- compliance of the directions given by this court under the judgment dated 10.07.2008 in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3713/2007. By the judgment aforesaid, a direction was given to the respondents to allow semi-permanent and permanent status to the workman on acquiring eligibility as per the provisions of Rule 3 of the Rajasthan P.W.D.(B & R) Including Gardens, Irrigation, Land Development (Programme) Circle C.A.D., Chambal Department, Kota including its Divisions/Sub- divisions, Water Works, Ayurvedik and Forest Department excluding Departmental Operation Circle Workcharged Employees Service Rules, 1964. [2].It is submitted by learne...
Law Mansion Foundation Vs. State and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. D.B.Civil Misc.Application No.40/2014 In D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.14273/2013 Law Mansion Foundation V/s State of Rajasthan & anr. Date of Order::- 26.2.2014. PRESENT Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Amitava Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vijay Bishnoi Mr.Siddharth Tatia for the applicant-writ-petitioner. ORDER BY THE COURT (Per Hon'ble Amitava Roy,CJ.Heard Mr.Tatia, learned counsel for the applicant-writ petitioner. The applicant-writ petitioner introducing itself to be a public charitable trust committed to the cause of protection of cultural and social rights of the people at large, had instituted D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.14273/2013 seeking appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to remove the Thelas from the Clock Tower area of Jodhpur City and to monitor the area periodically so that the Thelas do not spoil the heritage Clock Tower. 2 The averments made in the said writ petition clearly reveal that earl...
Lrs.of Om Shanker Vs. State Through Collector Udaipur and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.252/2012 LRs of late Shri Om Shanker v. State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 26th February, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Rajat Dave, for the appellants. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 07.05.2012 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Udaipur, whereby, the appeal filed by the appellants against judgment and decree dated 16.05.2002 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.1, Udaipur was dismissed and the dismissal of the suit filed by the appellants was affirmed. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the appellants- plaintiffs' father Om Shanker filed a suit on 15.09.1992 against the respondent-State and local authorities for declaration and permanent injunction with the averments that plaintiffs' house was situated at Delhi Gate, Udaipur; the same was acquired by him by way of partition dated ...
Union of India and ors Vs. Ex. Constable Papu Singh
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Union of India & ORS.versus Ex Constable Papu Singh D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.6/2010 UNDER RULE134OF THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RULES. Date of Judgment: Feb.26, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr.V.K.Mathur, Asstt.Solicitor General, for the appellants. Mr.S.K.Nanda, for the respondent. BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The present appeal mounts a challenge to the judgment and order dated 28.10.2009 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4597/1997 instituted by the respondent herein, whereby the Summary Security Force Court proceedings conducted against the respondent/writ petitioner have been quashed and the rejection of his statutory petition has also been adjudged to be illegal. The appellants have, thus, been directed to reinstate the respondent/writ petitioner in service. We have heard Mr.V.K.Mathur, learned Assistant Solicitor General for Unio...
Bikaner Sahakari Upbhokta Who.BhandA.Ltd Vs. Manmal Sharma and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Bikaner Sahakari Upbhokta versus Manmal Sharma & ORS.Wholesale Bhandar LTD.& anr. D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.203/2004 Under Section 18 of THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT ORDINANCE, 1949. Date of Judgment: Feb.26, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Dr.P.S.Bhati, A.A.G., assisted by Mr.Ravinder Singh, for the appellants. Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate, assisted by Mr.Mohit Singhvi, for the respondent/writ petitioner. BY THE COURT :(PER HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The appellants, being aggrieved by the defeasance of their decision to compulsorily retire the respondent herein from service vide judgment and order dated 27.2.2004 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5223/2003, are in appeal. We have heard Dr.P.S.Bhati, learned A.A.G.assisted by Mr.Ravinder Singh, for the appellants and Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate, assisted by Mr.Mohit Singhvi, for the respondent/ writ petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »