Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 18/2014 ( ) 29-01-2014 # , --:: ::-- ( ) ( # ) 18/2014 ***** : 29 , 2014 -: # :- . / . . /. : 1- - 6 . # , . , . -22/2013 " # " 9 09-11-2013 . >, . # . - 2 18/2014 ( ) 29-01-2014 6 . # , @. , . 95/2012 9 C . 18-07- 2013, . . - 332,353,224 C 9 . . . #C . C , 6 F 6 2- - 332 C 9 . . . #C, 353 C 9 . 500/- . . #C 224 C . 500/- . . #C . C 9 #- # . . > 3- - # . # - 6 224,332,353 C3 18/2014 ( ) 29-01-2014 9 6 . . K, - . >, . K # - M 9 302 C . 9 9 # , . 9 # # 18-12-2013 - > - 9 9 > : - . . > . . # # . 4- . 6 9 . M ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- SB Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No.09/2014 Ess Gee Real Estate Developers PVT.Ltd.v.Shri Rajkumar Kothari & ORS.Date of Order :: 28 th January, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.J.J.Bhatt Mr.M.C.Bhoot, Senior Advocates, assisted by Mr.Rashmikant Mr.O.P.Mehta Mr.Kuldeep Rajpurohit Mr.Vasudeo Gour, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr.Dinesh Mehta Mr.Vikas Balia Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, for the respondents...The applicant, a company incorporated, has preferred this application for appointment of an arbitrator to resolve the disputes between it and the respondents No.1 and 2 (hereinafter referred to as 'the purchasers') arising under the deed of conveyance dated 12.9.2005. The deed aforesaid provides a dispute resolution mechanism under its clause 17, that reads as under:- 17. Any disputes or differences of and/or in connection herewith will be resolved by mutual discussion failing which by a Sole Arbitrator (wither mutually agreed or not) who shall have summary powers and pas...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- SB Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No.27/2010 Surendra Agarwal v. Managing Director, HPCL & Anr. Date of Order :: 28 th January, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.O.P.Mehta, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr.Sunil Beniwal, for the respondents...The applicant is proprietor of M/s R.K.Filling Center and is having retail outlet for sale of Motor Spirit (Ms.and High Speed Diesel (HSD) under the dealership granted by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited. A memorandum of agreement dated 5.12.2005 was executed between the parties for the purpose. Clause 66 of the agreement aforesaid provides for arbitral proceedings to resolve any sort of dispute arising between the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and the applicant dealer. Clause 66 aforesaid reads as under:- 66. ANY DISPUTE OR DIFFERENCE OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER OR REGARDING ANY RIGHT, LIABILITY, ACT, OMISSION OR ACCOUNT OF ANY OF THE PARTIES HERETO ARISING OUT OF OR IN RELATION TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFERRE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- SB Civil Misc. Arbitration Application No.63/2010 M/s Varun Engineers & Contractors v. The Union of India & Anr. Date of Order :: 28 th January, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.P.K.Sharma, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr.Anirudh Purohit on behalf of Mr.V.K.Mathur, for the respondents...This application is preferred to have a direction for appointment of an independent arbitrator to resolve the dispute arising between the parties under the contract dated 30.7.1996 named as Construction of 120 men barracks including sanitary installation, water supply and drainage for 172 Bn. at B.S.F.Campus, Karanpur (Rajasthan).The facts relevant to be noticed are that the applicant, a partnership firm, entered into a contract with the respondent No.2 on 30.7.1996 for construction of 120 men barracks including sanitary installation, water supply and drainage for 172 Bn. at Border Security Force Campus, Karanpur (Rajasthan).As per the agreement arrived the work relating to the contract was...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6579/2009 M/S.Raghu Construction Company V/s. The State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order ::: 28.01.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Kuldeep Mathur for the petitioner. Mr.K.R.Saharan for the respondents. The petitioner-plaintiff has laid this writ petition against the order dated 17th December, 2008 passed by the District Judge, Jaisalmer, whereby the learned District Judge, while deciding Issue Nos.6 & 7 against him, has returned back the plaint as not maintainable. While deciding Issue Nos.6 & 7 against the petitioner-plaintiff, the learned Court below has referred two Clauses 23 and 34 of the agreement, which was executed between the rival parties. The relevant excerpt of the agreement showing Clauses 23 and 34 of the agreement is reproduced as under :- Clause 23 (Licence under Labour Act) (a) The contractor who employees 20 or more than 20 contract labourers will take a licence under co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER District Wholesale Kerosene Dealers Association versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2140/1998 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ***** DATE OF ORDER: January 28, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Abhinav Jain, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: The members of the petitioner association are wholesale dealers of kerosene, which is an essential commodity and its sale, purchase, storage, price fixation are under the control of the State Government. The State Government, while resorting to the provisions of the Rajasthan Trade Articles (Licensing and Control) Order 1980, decided to issue licences for carrying on wholesale [2].business of kerosene and requisite licences were issued to the members of the petitioner association by the District Supply Officer, Sr.Ganganagar. It was envisaged in the Control Order of 1980 that wholesaler is to receive kerosene from oil companies, namel...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 -105/2014 ( ! ) ! , --:: ( ::-- ( ) ( ! ) 105/2014 ***** ( : 28 , 2014 , ( . ( ( , 3 , .( , 7 8( ( 147, 148, 308/149, 323/149, 325/149, 342 365 3 , ?. , ( ,, , ( ( ( ( ( ( 7 A 2 -105/2014 ( ! ) ! ( 308 3 , ?. , ( ( D , A ( ( !, D ( A, H, D , A (, ( A ,: , ( ( D ( , ( 3 ! ! ( , ( ( ( N P ,Q , , !, , (, ( 06-01- 2014 ( ( 8 , A ! U ( , A, , , ( , , (, ( D A !, D ( , ( ( ( D , (, ( D ,, X N ,( P ,: : N U U , ( , ( ( , ,(Y, , , , , A ( ( D3 -105/2014 ( ! ) , ( 06-01-2014 : ( 7 7 , Z ( ! , , A U U , ( D N ,U U ( ,( HN ( ( 3 , , : ( , ( ].U ( ! ! !N , , A ((...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
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
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 S.B.CIVIL FIRs.APPEAL NO.342/2013 LRs of Shri Narendrasingh Bhati versus LRs of Fatehsingh & ORS.Date of Order :: 28.01.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.N.S.Charan, for the appellants. Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Sandeep Shah, for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, for the respondent No.6. ---- Heard learned counsel for the parties on application filed by respondent No.6 seeking transposition as appellant in the present appeal. It is, inter alia, indicated in the application that before the trial court the applicant was impleaded in the suit as legal representative of deceased Narendrasingh Bhati, who was plaintiff alongwith her brother and sister; while the present appeal has been filed by one of the sisters another appeal being S.B.Civil FiRs.Appeal No.349/2013 has been filed by the brother, and the interest of legal representative of respondent No.6 and the appellant are common and same; it would be just, proper and in the interest of just...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.COMPANY PETITION No.6/2011. M/s Swastic Coal International PVT.LTD.versus Chamunda Synprocess (India) LTD.// 1 // 14 S.B.COMPANY PETITION No.6/2011. M/s Swastic Coal International PVT.LTD.versus Chamunda Synprocess (India) Ltd.Date of Order :: 28th January 2014. HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Sanjeev Johari, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Agarwal, Director of the respondent Company. BY THE COURT: Mr.Amit Agarwal, said to be the Director of the respondent Company, is again present in person. Mr.Agarwal has today handed over a cheque bearing number 653165 dated 28.01.2014 for a sum of Rs.1,00,158/-, drawn in the name of the petitioner Company, towards payment of the remaining amount, said to be due for the transaction in question. The learned counsel Mr.Sanjeev Johari appearing for the petitioner Company has accepted the cheque as per the instructions and has given a receipt thereof. A copy of the receipt be placed on the record of this petition. Mr.Amit Agarwal submits that d...
Tag this Judgment!