Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
126/2013 6 1 ! ! ! , $' --:: - ! ::-- (1) 126/2013 (/ , 8 ) (2) 127/2013 (/ , 8 ) (3) 128/2013 (/ , 8 ) (4) 129/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (5) 130/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (6) 131/2013 ( ; , 8 ) (7) 132/2013 ( ; , 8 ) ***** -! @ A : 16 D, 2014 Reportable -: :- ; I ; D K ; 8; ; D, K ; .;.N ***** : Q Q R S / V 9; Q Q R ; : -5(8) /3/99, 26 126/2013 6 2 , 2000, Gr.6/99/5, 14.02.2001 .6(19) -6/99, 20.9.2001 S V8 _ 9; ; V 8 S b ; V D _ ; N Q ; R K/ D ( f).8 h, 8 ( j R " j " ; 9 ) ; h V 8 l m - l m S V ; 8 ; n K/ D ; j ; h l m - l m V8 ; Q; ; D ( - R 8 ) R ; - R _ S / 9 _ ; ; R D 01.12.1999 9 l - l ;- V8 ; ; j V : _ ; j ; ; l D (/ ).8 ; _ R j / ; R l D ; ; R /j D 2/K 1 ; ;...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
126/2013 6 1 ! ! ! , $' --:: - ! ::-- (1) 126/2013 (/ , 8 ) (2) 127/2013 (/ , 8 ) (3) 128/2013 (/ , 8 ) (4) 129/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (5) 130/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (6) 131/2013 ( ; , 8 ) (7) 132/2013 ( ; , 8 ) ***** -! @ A : 16 D, 2014 Reportable -: :- ; I ; D K ; 8; ; D, K ; .;.N ***** : Q Q R S / V 9; Q Q R ; : -5(8) /3/99, 26 126/2013 6 2 , 2000, Gr.6/99/5, 14.02.2001 .6(19) -6/99, 20.9.2001 S V8 _ 9; ; V 8 S b ; V D _ ; N Q ; R K/ D ( f).8 h, 8 ( j R " j " ; 9 ) ; h V 8 l m - l m S V ; 8 ; n K/ D ; j ; h l m - l m V8 ; Q; ; D ( - R 8 ) R ; - R _ S / 9 _ ; ; R D 01.12.1999 9 l - l ;- V8 ; ; j V : _ ; j ; ; l D (/ ).8 ; _ R j / ; R l D ; ; R /j D 2/K 1 ; ;...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
126/2013 6 1 ! ! ! , $' --:: - ! ::-- (1) 126/2013 (/ , 8 ) (2) 127/2013 (/ , 8 ) (3) 128/2013 (/ , 8 ) (4) 129/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (5) 130/2013 ( 9 , 8 ) (6) 131/2013 ( ; , 8 ) (7) 132/2013 ( ; , 8 ) ***** -! @ A : 16 D, 2014 Reportable -: :- ; I ; D K ; 8; ; D, K ; .;.N ***** : Q Q R S / V 9; Q Q R ; : -5(8) /3/99, 26 126/2013 6 2 , 2000, Gr.6/99/5, 14.02.2001 .6(19) -6/99, 20.9.2001 S V8 _ 9; ; V 8 S b ; V D _ ; N Q ; R K/ D ( f).8 h, 8 ( j R " j " ; 9 ) ; h V 8 l m - l m S V ; 8 ; n K/ D ; j ; h l m - l m V8 ; Q; ; D ( - R 8 ) R ; - R _ S / 9 _ ; ; R D 01.12.1999 9 l - l ;- V8 ; ; j V : _ ; j ; ; l D (/ ).8 ; _ R j / ; R l D ; ; R /j D 2/K 1 ; ;...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.4321/2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.4321/2013 Suo Moto versus District Education Officer, Jodhpur & ORS.DATE OF ORDER : 15th January 2014 HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Ms.Nupur Bhati ].Mr.V.K.Mathur ]., Court CommissioneRs.Dr. P.S.Bhati, Addl. Advocate General Mr.Manoj Bhandari for JDA, Jodhpur Mr.C.S.Kotwani for Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur Mr.B.P.Mathur for Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur This matter has been registered as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL') upon a learned Single Judge of this Court taking suo motu cognizance on the plight of the Sports Complex at Jodhpur, known as Gaushala Maidan, when it was reported that the complex was suffering from want of proper maintenance and was being allowed to be used for marriage purposes. It was also noticed that for the purpose of parking of the vehicles reaching the marriage functions, a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B.CIVIL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) PETITION NO.14318/2013 Ishwar Lal Versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 15.01.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr.O.P.Meghwanshi for the petitioner Mr.B.K.Mehar Government Advocate BY THE COURT : This habeas corpus petition is preferred by Mr.Ishwar Lal S/o Mr.Hari Ram, by caste Prajapat, resident of Village Baori, Tehsil Ahore within the jurisdiction of Police Station Nosra, District Jalore for production of his wife MRS.Dariya, said to be under illegal detention of respondent No.4 Ratti Ram. As per the averments contained in the petition for writ, MRS.Dariya with her two sons was abducted by Ratti Ram, the respondent No.4. This court by the order dated 13.12.2013 directed the petitioner to supply a copy of the habeas corpus petition to learned Government Advocate Mr.B.K.Mehar to enable him to [2].complete the instructions. O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.81/2011 Sattar Khan versus Chairman, Municipal Board, Churu & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 15.1.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.S.G.Ojha, for the appellant/s. Mr.D.C.Sharma, for the respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.Yashwant Mehta, for the respondent No.3. ---- BY THE COURT: This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 7.10.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Jr.Div.).Churu, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant has been dismissed and the same has been upheld by the appellate decree dated 7.3.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Churu. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of his ownership rights and permanent injunction regarding a strip of land said to be situated near his house. The suit was resisted by the respondent-Municipal Board, Churu and the private respondent. The trial court framed several issues. The material being as to whether the plainti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.199/2013 Mahaveer Marble versus LRs of Nainmal Date of Judgment :: 15.1.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Nikhil Dungawat, for the appellant/s. Mr.Om Mehta, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: After attempting to make submissions on the merits of the second appeal, the learned counsel for the appellant on instructions submits that the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and may be granted reasonable time to handover the vacant possession of the suit premises to the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the respondents-defendants submits that the suit was filed in the year 2000 and more than 13 years have already passed, therefore, there is no question of grant of any time for vacating the suit premises now. However, if the Court deems it proper then reasonable time may be granted to the appellant. Looking to the circumstances of the case, where the premises in que...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.874/2011 Deepa Ram versus Potaliya Krishi Seva Kendra & Anr. Date of Judgment :: 15.01.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.R.Ankiya, for Mr.V.N.Kalla, for the appellant. ---- BY THE COURT: This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 04.10.2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Churu ('the trial court') as upheld by the Additional District Judge, Churu ('the appellate court') by its judgment and decree dated 30.08.2011. The suit was filed by the plaintiff Potaliya Krishi Seva Kendra against the appellant and Churu District Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank for recovery of a sum of Rs.41,895/- alongwith interest. It was inter alia, claimed that goods were supplied by the plaintiff for setting-up a pump set and sprinkler set. While the payment of the pump set amounting to Rs.23,000/- was paid and the amount of sprinkler set Rs.36,500/- was not paid and, therefore, the plainti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.14600/2013 Bhagirath versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER : 15.01.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN BY POST. Mr.KR Bishnoi, Addl. Government Advocate..A letter addressed to this Court by convict prisoner Shri Bhagirath S/o. Goru Ram, presently lodged at Central Jail, Bikaner to have 20 days regular fiRs.parole as per provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1958') is treated as the petition for writ. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, District Churu by the judgment dated 29.8.2011 convicted Shri Bhagirath for offence punishable under Section 498-A Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo three yeaRs.rigorous imprisonment with fine. By the same judgment, the convict prisoner was also convicted for offence punishable under Section 304-B I.P.C.He has already served sentence for a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.13697/2013 Lala versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER : 15.01.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN BY POST. Mr.KR Bishnoi, Addl. Government Advocate..A letter addressed to this Court by convict prisoner Shri Lala S/o. Amreng to have 20 days regular fiRs.parole as per provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1958') is treated as the petition for writ. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the petitioner Lala is undergoing life term imprisonment at Central Jail, Udaipur being convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C.inter alia by the judgment dated 31.3.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Banswara. The convict prisoner being eligible for grant of fiRs.regular parole in accordance with the Rules, 1958 submitted an application to the competent Committee for having fiRs.parole. The Committee by r...
Tag this Judgment!