Rajasthan Jodhpur Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiv Giri Swami Vs. I.C.i.C.i. Bank Ltd., and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1640/2013 Shivgiri Swami Vs. ICICI Bank Limited & Ors. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India *** Date of Order ::27. h February, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Nitin Trivedi, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: Invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court enshrined under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner in this writ petition has assailed the impugned order dated 29th of January 2013 (Annex.4) passed by the second respondent. Succinctly stated, the factual matrix of this case is that the petitioner at the inception of his service career was appointed as Agriculture Officer (Scale-I) on 4th January 1988 with the erstwhile Bank of Rajasthan Limited. On successful completion of probation period of two years, the [2] petitioner was allotted Permanent Account not A-1138. While in service of the Bank of Rajasthan Limited, the petitio...
Dharam Pal and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
1. S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1609/2012 (Dharam Pal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr.) DATE OF ORDER :26. 2.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr. S.K. Dadhich, for the petitioners. Mr. O.P. Singaria, Public Prosecutor. The instant misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging the order dated 8.6.2012 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track), No.2, Hanumangarh, Head Quarter Nohar in revision, whereby, the order dated 2.6.2009 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh taking cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 147 and 323 IPC has been affirmed. In this case, the petitioner has failed to provide fresh address of the respondent No.2 despite the peremptory order dated 7.1.2013. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the orders impugned passed by the learned courts below, this court is of the opinion that the learned trial court has given s...
Laxmi Lal Vs. Arun and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2424/2012 Laxmi Lal Vs. Arun Katariya & Anr. Date of order ::26. 02.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Deepak Menaria, for the appellant. ----- Learned counsel for the appellant seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (ARUN BHANSALI), J.A.K. Chouhan/ 87...
Bhanwar Singh Vs. Addi. Dist. Collector, Deedwana and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
DB Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.76/2013 Bhanwar Singh. vs. The Addl. District Collector, Deedwana & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Bhanwar Singh. VS. The Additional District Collector, Deedwana & Ors. D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.76/2013 DATE OF JUDGMENT :::26. h February, 2013 PRESENT HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.AMITAVA ROY HONBLE MR.JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr.P.R. Singh, for the appellant. _____ BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE AMITAVA ROY, CJ.) : Heard learned counsel for the appellant. In challenge is the judgment and order dated 11.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.170/2013 rejecting the same. Thereby the learned Single Judge declined to interfere with the decision of the learned Additional District Collector, Deedwana refusing to grant the appellant herein the interim relief, as prayed for. For the order proposed to be passed, it is considered inessential to issue formal notice. The pleaded case of th...
Tej Raj Kothari Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13692/2012 Tej Raj Kothari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :26. 02.2013 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr. Narpat Singh for petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance before the appropriate authority. It is needless to say that it is always open for the petitioner to make representation before appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances and for that there is no need to take any permission from this Court. In such circumstances, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. [VIJAY BISHNOI],J.Babulal/ 69...
Dharmendra Soni Vs. M/S Money Line Credit Ltd. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2386/2011 Dharmendra Soni Vs. M/s Money Line Credit Limited, Jaipur & Ors. Date of order ::26. 02.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Ram Sukh, for the appellant. ----- Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. (ARUN BHANSALI), J.A.K. Chouhan/ 43...
Rajkumar Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
SBCWP No. 342/2013 Raj Kumar vs. State & Ors. Order dt:26. 2/2013 1/20 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 342/2013 (Raj Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER :26. 2/2013 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. M.R.Singhvi, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Dharma Ram, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Charan, for the respondent Municipal Council, Udaipur Mr. G.R.Punia, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Rajesh Punia, for Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, for applicant Mr. Vivek Vyas. Mr. S.R.Choudhary & Mr. Avinash Acharya for applicants Bhuvnesh Maneshwari & Suresh Mal Mehta.1. By this order, I.A.No.674/2013 filed by one Vivek Vyas, I.A.No.855/2013 filed by Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur and I.A.No. 858/2013 filed by one Bhuvnesh Maheshwari and Suresh Mal Mehta seeking impleadment in the present writ petition as respondents are being disposed of.2. Mr. G.R.Punia, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Rajesh Punia represents the Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Mr. Sa...
Radhey Shyam Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1225/2013 Radhey Shyam Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :26. 02.2013 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr. R.K. Charan, for petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance before the appropriate authority. It is needless to say that it is always open for the petitioner to make representation before appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances and for that there is no need to take any permission from this Court. In such circumstances, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. [VIJAY BISHNOI],J.Babulal/ 77...
Manpreet Kaur Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1495/2013 Manpreet Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :26. 02.2013 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr. G.J.Gupta, for petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make appropriate representation for redressal of her grievance before the appropriate authority. It is needless to say that it is always open for the petitioner to make representation before appropriate authority for redressal of her grievances and for that there is no need to take any permission from this Court. In such circumstances, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. [VIJAY BISHNOI],J.Babulal/ 71...
Satish Kumar Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9816/2010 Satish Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Date of Order :26. 02.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr. H.R. Chawala for petitioner. Mr. K.K. Bissa for respondents. BY THE COURT: The petitioner, a Deed Writer working at Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar, has filed this writ petition against the order dated 9.7.2010 whereby the respondent No.3 has cancelled his licence dated 5.7.1993 (Annex.1) issued under the provisions of Rajasthan Registration (Licensing of Documents Writers) Rules, 1956. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was holding the licence as a Deed Writer since 1993. The licence was renewed from time to time upto 31.12.2007. On 18.12.2007, the petitioner has moved an application for renewal of his licence, however, no order was issued on that application, then the petitioner approached the office of District Registrar, Sri Ganganagar, whereby he was ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »