Rajasthan Jodhpur Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Durga Acharya Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3615/2010 Smt. Durga Acharya Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :10. 01.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Gopal Acharya for the petitioner Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh for the respondents BY THE COURT : The petitioner was employed as Warden Teacher through a placement agency, namely, Indian Institute of Placement and Career Consultancy, Jhalawar in the year 2007. By the order impugned dated 16.03.2010, the Additional District Project Co-ordinator, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Chittorgarh, in pursuant to the letter dated 05.03.2010 from the placement agency referred above, ordered to relieve the petitioner from the post held by her. Being aggrieved by the same, this petition for writ is preferred. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no reason at all is given for withdrawing the petitioner (2) from service and as such, the order impugned is bad. Per co...
Ram Prakash Sharma Vs. Dr. Govind Sharma and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
S.B.C.C.P. No.225/2010 in S.B.C.W.P. No.6582/2007 Ram Prakash Sharma Vs. Dr. Govind Sharma & Ors. Order dt:10. 01/2013 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.225/2010 Ram Prakash Sharma Vs. Dr. Govind Sharma & ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6582/2007 Ram Prakash Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::10. h January 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Kaushal Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L. Jangid, AAG & Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.S. Bishnoi, for the respondents. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This contempt petition arises out of order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in SBCWP No.6641/2007- Deepak Khanna & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors., including the writ petition filed by the present petitioner being SBCWP No.6582/2007- Ram Prakash Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., at serial number 6 in the said batch, which came to be disposed of by the learned Single Judge on...
Lrs of Late Shri Mani Ram Vs. State of Raj and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
SBCIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2936/2001 - LRs. of Late Mani Ram V/s State of Rajasthan : ORDER DTD. 10.1.2013 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2936/2001 LRs. of late Mani Ram versus State of Rajasthan and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Varun Goyal, for the petitioner. Mr. S. Bhandawat, for the respondents. DATE OF ORDER :10. h January, 2013. BY THE COURT (ORAL) 1. The only grievance raised in the present writ petition is condonation of delay of one year by the learned Board of Revenue in first appeal filed by the State by the impugned order dtd.29.1.2001 (Annex.8).2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Varun Goyal urged that the reason assigned by the State in seeking condonation of delay in its application filed by it under Section 5 of the Limitation Act that due to preparation for Lok Sabha elections by the officials, the appeal could not be filed within limitation, was absolutely wrong since Lok Sabha ele...
Jugata Ram Vs. State of Raj
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
{1} DB CRIM. WRIT PET(PAROLE).13685/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R D.B.CRIMINAL WRIT(PAROLE) PETITION NO.13685/2012 JUGTARAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE:10.01.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI By Post. Mr. K.R. Bishnoi, Addl. Government Advocate, for the respondent. **** A copy of this letter petition has been supplied to the learned Additional Government Advocate.2. Heard finally.3. Convict-petitioner Jugtaram S/o Pabudan, has preferred this parole writ petition, by post, from jail for grant of first parole of 20 days.4. It appears that letter petition has been sent directly to this Court, without approaching the District Parole Advisory Committee first.5. We have considered the contents of the application and the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate.6. As per the provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 {2} DB CRIM. WRIT PET(PAROLE).13685/2012 (hereinafter...
Dev Kishan Vs. Rent Tribunal, Jodhpur and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
SBCIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9233/2011 DEV KISHAN V/S RENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ORS. : ORDER DTD. 10.1.2013 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9233/2011 Dev Kishan versus The Rent Appellate Tribunal and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI None presdent, for the petitioner. Mr.J.R.Patel, for the respondents. DATE OF ORDER :10. h January, 2013. BY THE COURT (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the tenant defendant against the judgment dgtd.26.5.2011 passed by the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal in Rent Control Appeal No.37/2011 -Suraj Prakash Soni V/s Dev Kishan whereby the learned Rent Appellate Tribunal rejected the appeal and upheld the judgment dtd.24.1.2011 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, Jodhpur in Case No.167/2008 Dev Kishan V/s Suraj Prakash Soni whereby the learned Rent Tribunal allowed the application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 in respect of suit shop situated at Ghoro Ka ...
Manphool and ors Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
SBCIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2936/2001 - LRs. of Late Mani Ram V/s State of Rajasthan : ORDER DTD. 10.1.2013 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2121/1997 Manphool and ors. versus State of Rajasthan and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI None present, for the petitioners. Mr. S. Bhandawat, for the respondents. DATE OF ORDER :10. h January, 2013. BY THE COURT (ORAL) 2. The only grievance raised in the present writ petition is condonation of delay of one year by the learned Board of Revenue in first appeal filed by the State by the impugned order dtd.29.1.2001 (Annex.8).3. The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Varun Goyal urged that the reason assigned by the State in seeking condonation of delay in its application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act that due to preparation of Lok Sabha elections by the officials, the appeal could not be filed within limitation, was absolutely wrong since Lok Sabha elections were a...
Mohammed Arshad and anr Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8666/2010 Mohammed Arshad & Anr. Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :10. 01.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit for the petitioners Mr. Vimal Mathur for the respondents BY THE COURT : By an order dated 29.08.1980, the Governor of Rajasthan granted sanction for creation of two divisions and nine sub-divisions of Public Health Engineering Department with necessary supporting staff including the posts of Foreman Grade-I, Senior Driller, Driller, Compressor cum Machine Operator, Assistant Driller, Mechanic Grade-I, Electrician Grade-I, Driver, Lower Division Clerk cum Time Keeper, Mechanic Grade-II, Welder, Fitter-II, Mason, Blacksmith, Helper and Helper cum Cleaner. As a consequent to the process of selection conducted to fill up the posts aforesaid appointments were accorded to the petitioners as (2) Compressor Driver vide order dated 03.09.198...
U.i.T.,udaipur Vs. Kering and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
S.B.C.W.P. No.2654/2003 U.I.T., Udaipur Vs. Kering & Ors. Judgment dt:10. 01/2013 1/7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2654/2003 U.I.T., Udaipur Vs. Kering S/o Amara Bheel & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::10. h January 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. Deelip Kawadia, for the petitioner- UIT, Udaipur. Mr. B.K. Bhatnagar ] Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat ]- for the respondents. -- 1. This writ petition has been filed by the Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'UIT, Udaipur') against the order dated 22.05.2002 (Annex.10) passed by the Division Bench of Board of Revenue, whereby the Board of Revenue held affirming the findings of revenue courts below that the new Khasra No.365, 366 and 367 of Village Goverdhan Vilas, Tehsil Girwa, District: Udaipur, were not the renumbering of old Khasra No. 259 and such finding arrived at by them on the basis of comparison of the old and new trace map...
Sona Ram @ Sohan Ram Vs. State of Raj
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
{1} DB CRIM. WRIT PET(PAROLE).13683/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R D.B.CRIMINAL WRIT(PAROLE) PETITION NO.13683/2012 SONARAM @ SOHANRAM Vs.STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE:10.01.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI By Post. Mr. K.R. Bishnoi, Addl. Government Advocate, for the respondent. **** A copy of this letter petition has been supplied to the learned Additional Government Advocate.2. Heard finally.3. Convict-petitioner Sonaram @ Sohanram S/o Shri Sanwata Ram, has preferred this parole writ petition, by post, from jail for grant of first parole of 20 days.4. It appears that letter petition has been sent directly to this Court, without approaching the District Parole Advisory Committee first.5. We have considered the contents of the application and the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate.6. As per the provisions of Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 {2} DB CRIM. WRIT PET(PAR...
SirajudIn Vs. S. K. Singh and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
S.B.C.C.P. No.481/2011 in S.B.C.W.P. No.124/2009 Sirajudin Vs. S.K. Singh & Ors. Order dt:10. 01/2013 1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.481/2011 Sirajudin Vs. S.K. Singh & Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.124/2009 Sirajudin Vs. The State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::10. h January 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. D.S. Sodha on behalf of Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L. Jangid, Sr. Advocate & AAG with Mr. Sundeep Bhandawat, for the respondents. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners for the alleged deliberate disobedience committed by the respondents of the directions issued by a Coordinate Bench of this Court disposing of the writ petition vide the order dated 18.03.2011 with the following directions while disposing of the writ petition No.124/2009: - The petition for writ, therefore, deserves to be allowed. The amendm...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »