Rajasthan Jodhpur Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Dev Vs. Kum.Sunita and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1671/2010 Ramdev. Vs. Kum.Sunita & Anr. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1671/2010 Ramdev. vs. Sunita & Anr. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.TRS Sodha, for the petitioner. Mr.AR Nikub, PP, for the respondent State. Mr.Rajendra Charan, for the respondent no.1. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the respondent no.1's father, challenging the order dated 14.10.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahpura, District Bhilwara whereby the revision petition filed by the respondent no.1 against the order dated 16.9.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jahajpur, was allowed and it was directed that the respondent no.1 Sunita shall be entitled to receive maintenance from the petitioner till the date of her marriage. Counsel for the pet...
Bank of Raj.Ltd Vs. Bhanwar Singh
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No.216/2011 in S.B. Civil First Appal No.150/2010 The Bank of Rajasthan Limited Vs. Bhanwar Singh Rathore Order dt:30/05/2012 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Restoration Application No.216/2011 in S.B. Civil First Appeal No.150/2010 The Bank of Rajasthan Limited Vs. Bhanwar Singh Rathore Date of Order :::30. h May, 2012 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Vinay Jain, for the petitioner/appellant. -- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant.2. The defect No.2 pointed out by the office is over-ruled. Heard on application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act.3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, the delay of 159 days' occurred in filing the restoration application is condoned. For the reasons stated in the restoration application, the restoration application is allowed. The civil first appeal is restroed to its original number and position. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.DJ/- 1...
Sukha Singh Vs. State (Uit) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
1 DB Civil Review Petition No.43/2012 Sukha Singh Vs. State & Ors. 1 D.B. Civil Review Petition No.43/2012 Sukha Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER:30. h May 2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-II Dr. P.S. Bhati, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find any ground for review of the order dated 26.03.2012 whereby the intra-court appeal filed by the petitioner-appellant (SAW No.191/2012) was dismissed in limine for being devoid of merit in relation to the claim for allotment of the referred piece of land but with the observations and liberty to the petitioner for applying for allotment of any fresh piece of land as per Rules. Shorn of unnecessary details, suffice is to notice for the present purpose that the petitioner filed a writ petition (CWP No.6009/2011) seeking directions against the respondents for...
Champa Lal and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.726/2012 Champa Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.726/2012 Champa Lal & Ors. vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Vineet Jain, for the petitioners. Mrs.Chandralekha, PP, for the respondent State. None present for the respondent no.2. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioners seeking quashing of the proceedings of the F.I.R. No.343/2011 registered against the petitioners at P.S. Udai Mandir, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. Succinctly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of the instant misc. petition are that the complainant/ respondent no.2 lodged a report at P.S. Udai Mandir alleging inter alia that he had purchased plot no.736 located SB Criminal...
Smt. Nirmala Vs. Hanuman Singh and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.453/2004 Smt. Nirmala Vs. Hanuman Singh & Ors. Judgment dtd. 30/05/2012 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT S.B. Civil First Appeal No.453/2004 Smt. Nirmala Vs. Hanuman Singh & Ors. Date of Judgment :::30. h May 2012 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Manish Shishodia, for the appellant-defendant. Mr. M.S. Purohit, for the respondent No.1. Mr. Hemant Balani, for the applicants. Mr. Jagdish Vyas, for the respondents No.2 & 3. -- 1. Heard on application (IA No.17953/11) filed by the appellant under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 CPC for bringing the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 Hanuman Singh on record, who is said to have expired on 16.07.2011 leaving behind him two sons, as legal representatives.2. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, the application (IA No.17953/11) is allowed. The legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 are taken on record. Amended cause title is t...
Sipu @ Sandeep Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Revision Petition No.20/2011 Sipu @ Sandeep. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.20/2011 Sipu @ Sandeep. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.SS Dhillon, for the petitioner. Mrs.Chandralekha, PP, for the respondent State. None present for the respondents no.2 and 3. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner (complainant) challenging the order dated 16.12.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur in Sessions Case No.14/2009 (State vs. Rajpal & Ors.) whereby the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning the respondents no.2 and 3 to face trial with the charge- sheeted accused in the above mentioned case for the SB Criminal Revision Petition No.20/2011 Sipu @ Sandeep....
Ram Kumar Vs. Darbara Singh
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1413/2010 Ram Kumar Avasthi. Vs. Darbara Singh. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1413/2010 Ram Kumar Avasthi. vs. Darbara Singh. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.MK Garg, for the petitioner. Mr.VK Bhadu, for the respondent. ... BY THE COURT : Reportable Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order dated 2.6.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Sri Ganganagar rejecting the revision petition filed by him against the order dated 12.3.2010 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases), Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No.227/2009. The petitioner, who is facing trial in the court of learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases), Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Case No.227/2009, filed an application praying that the proceeding of the ...
Prakash Chand Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1330/2006 ( Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER Prakash Chand. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1330/2006... Date of Order: May 30, 2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr. A.R. Nikub, Public Prosecutor for the State. BY THE COURT: Reportable The instant miscellaneous petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings of the Complaint Case No. 179/2001 pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanore, district Udaipur and against the order dated 27.7.2001 passed by the learned trial Court whereby cognizance was taken against the petitioner for the offence under Section 7 (1) read with Section 16 (1) (a) and (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, the P.F.A. Act). Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are that the peti...
Suresh Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1085/2012 Suresh. Vs. State of Rajasthan. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1085/2012 Suresh. vs. State of Rajasthan. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Suresh Kumbhat, for the petitioner. Mr.KK Rawal, PP, for the respondent State. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order dated 21.4.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat in revision whereby the order dated 8.2.2011 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sojat in Criminal Case No.461/2005 has been modified and the charges framed against the petitioner have been altered from the offences under Sections 418, 419 and 420 r/w 34 IPC to the offences under Sections 120B, 447 and 467 r/w 109 IPC. Succinctly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of the instant...
Rajnarayan Rathi Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: May-30-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.754/2009 Raj Narayan Rathi. Vs. State of Rajasthan. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.754/2009 Raj Narayan Rathi. vs. State of Rajasthan. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.SN Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr.AR Nikub, PP, for the respondent State. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order dated 29.1.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbatsar rejecting the revision petition filed by him against the order dated 2.9.2008 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbatsar in Criminal Case No.10/1996 whereby charge was framed against the petitioner for the offence under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short the Act of 1954). Succinctly stated the facts necessary for the disposal SB C...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »