Rajasthan Jodhpur Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Barkat Ali Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.9393/2012 Barkat Ali. Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :19. h December, 2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.PN Mohanani, for the petitioner. Mr.MA Bhurat, P.P. This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with F.I.R. No.220/2012 registered at Police Station, Naya Shahar, Bikaner for the offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 509 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that at best the offence which can be said to be made out against the petitioner cannot travel beyond Section 354 IPC. He thus prayed that the petitioner deserves to be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand vehemently opposed the submissions raised on behalf of the petitioner. He submitted that it is a specific case of the prosecution that the petitioner was a teacher in the school of the prosecutrix Mst.R, a small girl aged 13 year...
Manish Mathur Vs. State of Raj. and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12684/2012 Manish Mathur Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :19. 12.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Kuldeep Mathur for the petitioner Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for the respondents BY THE COURT : While working as Foreman-I in the Department of Mines and Geology, a criminal case was registered against the petitioner at Anti Corruption Bureau Outpost, Jodhpur, Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur on 05.08.2010 for the offences punishable under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1988') and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. As a consequent to lodging of the case aforesaid, the petitioner was placed under suspension under an order dated 23.08.2010 passed by the Director, Mines and Geology. Under a letter dated 26.09.2010, the Director, Mines and Geology, Government of Rajastha...
Jai Narayan Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4817/2010 Jai Narayan Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :19. 12.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. C.S. Bissa for the petitioner Mr. Vimal Mathur for the respondents BY THE COURT : The petitioner entered in the services of the respondents being appointed as Gangman under an order dated 01.03.1970. At the time of initial appointment, his date of birth recorded was 05.05.1950. A promotion thereafter was accorded to the petitioner as Helper with effect from 01.04.1971. By submitting a representation dated 02.07.1973, the petitioner made a request to the competent authority of the respondents to make necessary correction in his service record relating to his date of birth. As per the petitioner, his date of birth was 20.04.1951, but was erroneously recorded as 05.05.1950. After considering the application submitted by the petitioner, necessary correction in the servic...
Parasmal JaIn Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11873/2012 (Parasmal Jain Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :19. 12.2012 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS None present for the petitioner. I have perused the impugned order dated 12.10.2012 whereby the learned trial Court allowed the application filed by the respondent No.4. under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Learned trial Court observed in the order that respondent No.4 is necessary party to adjudicate the controversy. I am satisfied with the reasons given by the trial Court in allowing the application filed by the respondent No.4 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Therefore, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (Gopal Krishan Vyas), J.arun...
Shokat Ali Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7569/2012 Shokat Ali Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :19. 12.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rajesh Shah for the petitioner BY THE COURT : To question correctness of the order dated 06.03.2012 passed by the disciplinary authority, i.e. the District Education Officer (Elementary Education), Sirohi, this petition for writ is preferred. By the order aforesaid, the disciplinary authority imposed a penalty of withholding of one annual grade increment with cumulative effect upon the petitioner. This court while admitting the writ petition under the order dated 16.08.2012 stayed effect and operation of the order impugned. No reply to the writ petition has been filed so far despite service. However, looking to narrow amplitude of the controversy involved in this petition for writ, I am deciding the same without further waiting for the reply to the writ petition (2) o...
Naresh Kumar Goyal Vs. Smt. Sunita and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2318/2011 Naresh Kumar Goyal. Vs. Smt. Sunita & Ors. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.2318/2011 Naresh Kumar Goyal. vs. Smt. Sunita & Ors. Date of Judgment ::19. h December, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.MK Garg, for the petitioner. Mr.Pradeep Shah, for the respondents. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner Naresh Kumar is the husband of respondent Sunita and father of the respondents Dipu (daughter) and Nived (son). The respondents herein filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner claiming maintenance. The application came to be heard and considered by the A.C.J.M., Sangaria who by his order dated 11.1.2010 rejected the application for maintenance filed by respondent Sunita but directed that the respondent Dipu would be entitled to receive maintenance @ Rs.2,000/- SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2318/2011 N...
Ghanshyam Panwar and ors Vs. State (Rural Deve. and Pan. Raj.) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1223/2012 (Ghanshyam Ppanwar & Ors Vs. State & Ors) Date of Order ::19. 12.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Dr. Nupur Bhati, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioners in this writ petition has made following prayer :- A. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the order dated 9.2.2010 (Annex.5) and any subsequent order passed by the respondents for affording appointment through placement agency on the post of computer operator may kindly be quashed and set aside. B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to afford appointment to the petitioners directly and continue the petitionrs on the post of Computer Operator until the NREGS continues. C. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be restrained from giving the work of computer operator through private companies in NREGS Admini...
Mangilal Rawal Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13277/2012 (Mangi Lal Rawal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :19. 12.2012 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Sukesh Bahti, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to award marks for state certificate of Rajasthan Ball Badminton Association, which is said to be affiliated to the Ball Badminton Federation of India. Whether the said game is recognized or not, it is not known because no documentary evidence is placed on record. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation along with provision of recognization of Ball Badminton by the State Government. Upon filing the said representation, it is expected from the respondents that the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law for providing the marks to the petitioner within one month fro...
Shailaja JaIn Vs. State Bank of India and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.216/2012. Shailaja Jain Vs. SBI & Anr. // 1 // 11 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.216/2012. Shailaja Jain Vs. SBI & Anr. .. Date of Order ::19. h December 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE NISHA GUPTA Mr. Avinash Acharya, for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Vyas, for the respondents. BY THE COURT: The petitioner-appellant has preferred this intra-court appeal against the order dated 14.09.2012 as passed in CWP No.8439/2011 whereby the learned Single Judge declined to entertain the writ petition on her grievance against the communication dated 18.08.2010 (Annex.5) seeking to dispense with her services from the date of expiry of the term of contract; and on the prayer for consideration of her case for absorption in accordance with the policy framed. It was submitted before the learned Single Judge, inter alia, that similarly situated employees had been absorbed by the respondent-bank, as would appear from the submissions made in the pe...
Hansraj Parihar and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.8191/2012 Hansraj Parihar & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :19. h December, 2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Dhirendra Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.Anil Joshi, P.P. Mr.MK Trivedi, for the complainant. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.254/2012 registered at Jodhpur Women Police Station, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the complainant. He submitted that the complainant Kalpana was married to Ajay Kumar, son of the petitioners on 7.2.2003 and thereafter, she hardly stayed with the petitioners for a small period of time. He contended that it is the complainant who has deserted her husband and is living at Jodhpur with her father with...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »