Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4 of 2011 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Gupta, son of Shiv Kumar Gupta, resident of Muhalla- Hanuman Pathak, Buxar, P.S. Buxar (Town), District-Buxar .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 3.11.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Buxar in Cr. Misc. (T.P.) No. 33 of 2010 by which petition filed under Section 210 of the Code...
Shambhu Pandey and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34869 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Shambhu Pandey S/O Ganesh Pandey R/O Vill- Milki Chowk, P.S- Bazar Samiti, Distt- Samastipur, 2. Anil Pandey S/O Dharmendra Pandey R/O Vill- Milki Chowk, P.S- Bazar Samiti, Distt- Samastipur, .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Hajipur Town P.S.Case No.75 of 2011 for the offences punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Co...
Rajesh Bhagat Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2077 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajesh Bhagat .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 366A/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner and two others to have enticed away the daughter of the informant for marriage purposes. The informant claims that he heard the voice of accused Rahul Bhagat talking on phone to Jhunna Bhagat that he has reached the girl at the destination. It appears that Jhunna Bhagat has been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 631 of 2012. I see no reason by learned Court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders ...
Braj Kishore Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1930 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1930 of 2012 ====================================================== Braj Kishore Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, the accusations are of demand of dowry and torture but it is submitted that subsequent to the lodging of this complaint the petitioner has filed the divorce case which is pending for reconciliation and the petitioner is ready for reconciliation. Considerin...
Ganesh Prasad and ors Vs. Ram Prasad Sao and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.83 of 2006 Ganesh Prasad & Ors Versus Ram Prasad Sao & Ors ---------------------------------- 19. 23.01.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the appellants on the interlocutory application No. 110 of 2012 and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. This interlocutory application No.110 of 2012 has been field by the appellants seeking permission to withdraw this first appeal unconditionally. In view of the fact that the appellants are seeking permission to withdraw this appeal unconditionally there is no option but to grant permission to the appellants to withdrawn this first appeal because there is no provision in C.P.C. to compel a party to prosecute the proceeding initiated by him in the court. In view of the above prayer the interlocutory application is allowed and the appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal unconditionally. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sa...
Jitendra Kumar @ Ravi Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44436 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Jitendra Kumar @ Ravi Paswan, Son of Baidhnath Paswan, Resident of Malighat Chowk, ,P.S.- Mithanpura, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kishanganj Railway P.S.Case No.22 of 2011 for the offence punishable under sections 366, 372 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the allegation made in the F.I.R, submits that though this petitioner had accompanied the girl along with co-accused Seema Devi to Kishanganj, no all...
Bhagan Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3247 of 2012 Bhagan Mahto, Son of Banaras Mahto, resident of village Khawaspur, Police Station Basantpur, District Siwan. ........... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .......... Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 23.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for the offence under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case as alleged by the informant is that while she was gone out to Siwan his daughter was kidnapped. Naturally she is not an eye-witness. From the order of the learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the bail petition of the petitioner, however, taking into consideration paragraph nos. 9, 10, 11 and 14 of the case diary has observed that there is prior enmity and both the parties are in litigating term. It has further been mentioned that none of the witnesses is the eye-witness to ...
JamaluddIn Khan @ Jamal Khan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21570 of 2011 ====================================================== Jamaluddin Khan @ Jamal Khan, Son of Jainuddin Khan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of both the case diary earlier called for. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of assaulting father of the informant by means of gandasa. Submission is that though the injured sustained two injurie...
Rahul Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33885 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33885 of 2011 ================================================== 1. Rahul Kumar, son of Subhash Yadav 2. Shushil Kumar, son of Ram Pravesh Yadav 3. Ram Pravesh Yadav, son of Sri Bhagwat Yadav 4. Shyam Kumar, son of Sri Sindhu Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 267/2011 for the offences under Sections 341, 342, 447, 323, 379, 386, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier vide order dated 02.12.2011, this application was dismissed as...
Nagendra Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2049 of 2012 Nagendra Prasad Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being Panchayat Secretary, is apprehending arrest in a case registered under sections 406, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially, the complaint was filed. It is alleged that the petitioner issued a death certificate with regard to Shanti Devi to the effect that she died on 7.4.2005. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that since the informant got a registered deed executed fraudulently from Shanti Devi in his favour on 11.4.2005 claiming that she died on 14.5.2005, he is also facing prosecution. Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishin...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »